Topic: What would you do if the United States of America passed a new male guardianship law?
Anonymous A started this discussion 4 years ago #102,871
Similar to laws in countries like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This new law would make it to where every female citizen in the country whose official documents are marked with a "F" be required to register themselves to a man. In order to appease progressives, the women would have the choice of who to register themselves to and trans women who have already went through the legal process of getting their official documents and information changed over from "M" to "F" would also be required to apply. The law would state that it's for anyone whose documents are marked with an "F."Women who are unregistered would be temporarily registered to the state until either a male guardian is found or they find one on their own. Also, to appease the progressives, women would have the right to re-register themselves in the event of circumstances such as (but not limited to) domestic abuse and sexual assault. A woman will be automatically registered to their father until they turn the age of eighteen. Fathers reserve the right to choose a male guardian should they deem their daughter to be ill-fit of the decision. They may also file an appeal to remain as the woman's guardian for an extended period of time. An expected expiration date must be given as male guardianship for fathers cannot be extended for the duration of their daughter's life.
Together we can make this country great again by ensuring the safety and security of women while also respecting the rights of their male relatives and spouses. Same-sex marriages conducted prior to the law taking effect will be respected, but will not be legal after the authorization date of this law. And for every great citizen of this respected nation, both men and women, god bless the United States of America.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,161,941
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,161,946
That doesn't sound gross at all to you when you read it back?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,161,976
Dumb question.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,161,978
Extremely tl;dr text but I will say based solely on the title that this is a dumb idea.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 17 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,161,979
change my ig pic
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,154
@1,161,946 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
"Gross" because OP said transwomen would be treated like every other woman?
Nice take, bigot, but people deserve the rights and responsibilities of the gender they identify with.
"Gross" because OP said transwomen would be treated like every other woman?
Nice take, bigot, but people deserve the rights and responsibilities of the gender they identify with.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,156
This thread is fine, but a photography thread is deleted. Great work, Meta.