Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
> The movement of a man's hand directly contributes to another man's orgasm. How is this not gay?
Well maybe your topic heading is wrong? You say that the people looking at erotic art are gay. Guys looking at erotic art are gay when the pictures are of women?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,158,456
@1,158,453 (C)
The simple fact of the matter is the movement of a man's hand directly contributes to another man's orgasm. How is this not gay?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,158,457
Is a man giving another man a hand job straight as long as the receiver pretends that the man is a woman?
Anonymous C replied with this 4 years ago, 10 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,158,458
I think that is was that famous book on male sexuality written in the 1920s 1948, by Alfred Kinsey. But a statistic like that is easy to find, just ask a couple of hundred men of various ages.
I don't have a definition of straight or gay because it's too complex to describe. However I prefer to use a percentage system. For example I consider myself to be 97% straight and 3% gay.
(Edited 26 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,158,478
@previous (C)
What percentage of gay would you rate a man using his hands to get another man off? Both the giver and receiver.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 4 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,158,480