Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A started this discussion 4 years ago#102,473
He lost his case against The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and I have no idea what that local paper might have said about him. The paper might have quoted what the FBI told them verbatim, in which case the paper wouldn't be guilty of libel. I already said if what is being quoted comes from court hearings which would include law enforcement, then it is legal to quote it.
If my local Sheriff says something to the press about me which isn't true, the press has the right to print what the Sheriff said. The press doesn't have the right to ab lib by adding lies to the story like the lamestream left wing media has a nasty habit of doing all of the time, and I could sue them for those lies.
So, Jewell sued his college where he worked, NBC and CNN, and those three settled out of court with him because they knew they went overboard by telling their outright lies about him. He won 3 out of 4, and that ain't bad. I'll take those odds any day of the week.
I don't know everyone Sandmann was suing, but he won against The Washington Post, MSNBC and CNN so far. Rittenhouse will win them as well. The 1st Amendment does not give the press the right to destroy reputations with outright lies. Sorry, but it doesn't give them that right.
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 36 minutes later[^][v]#1,157,843
who
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,157,847
@previous (jodie !foster2PAQ)
No " Absence Of Malice" In Either Case.
The Fact's in the Sandmann case were deliberately concealed by the Washington Compost and BSNBC as well as the rest of the lamestream media. They deliberately defamed Sandman with malice and forethought. No Doubt of the actual events being the opposite of their narrative could be considered.
As for Rittenhouse,the malicious intent was not only on the lamestream media but the judicial system of Wisconsin. The 2nd amendment and the basic right of self preservation was on trial with clear film footage of the events that left no doubt in any non-prejudice juror with enough native intelligence to find their way to the courthouse .