Topic: Moderna was three steps ahead of this virus.
Anonymous A started this discussion 4 years ago #102,460
War Pigs joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,157,720
Daily Mail
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,722
War Pigs replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,725
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 10 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,731
@OP
@1,157,720 (War Pigs)
@1,157,722 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
@previous (War Pigs)
Can you please summarise your points in video form using only credible sources?
@1,157,720 (War Pigs)
@1,157,722 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
@previous (War Pigs)
Can you please summarise your points in video form using only credible sources?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,732
@1,157,725 (War Pigs)
I don't know if they did or not. Now can you tell me what's wrong with the article?
I don't know if they did or not. Now can you tell me what's wrong with the article?
Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 36 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,733
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
You are leaving open the possibility that Moderna intentionally engineered COVID?
You are leaving open the possibility that Moderna intentionally engineered COVID?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,734
Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,736
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,737
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,738
@1,157,736 (B)
You didn't answer the question. I didn't ask if it was crazy to believe it. I asked: how can I know whether or not they engineered COVID?
You didn't answer the question. I didn't ask if it was crazy to believe it. I asked: how can I know whether or not they engineered COVID?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,751
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,752
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 11 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,815
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,817
I see Mr "War Pigs" shuts up when you ask him an actual scientific question 😂😂😂
Anonymous H replied with this 4 years ago, 26 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,818
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Maybe he doesn't know that viruses can be manufactured. Even more scarily, so can bacteria. The technology is more than a decade old:
https://www.jcvi.org/research/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell
Maybe he doesn't know that viruses can be manufactured. Even more scarily, so can bacteria. The technology is more than a decade old:
https://www.jcvi.org/research/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,826
Question, how different is the DNA of the covid 19 than the previous instances of coronavirus?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 12 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,827
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
It's different enough that the consensus is that two viruses combined to create it. It's not simply one mutation distinction from another .
It's different enough that the consensus is that two viruses combined to create it. It's not simply one mutation distinction from another .
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,829
@1,157,826 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Interesting scientific question. I'm sure Mr. "War Pigs", our resident science expert, will explain it shortly 🤣
Interesting scientific question. I'm sure Mr. "War Pigs", our resident science expert, will explain it shortly 🤣
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 4 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,832
@1,157,827 (J)
Is the DNA patented by moderna also in the previous coronavirus DNA is my question basically. Or has no one looked?
Is the DNA patented by moderna also in the previous coronavirus DNA is my question basically. Or has no one looked?
Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,833
Anonymous J replied with this 4 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,836
@1,157,832 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Both precursor viri were known and sequenced. Moderna can't patent it if it was already in an extant virus.
Both precursor viri were known and sequenced. Moderna can't patent it if it was already in an extant virus.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 4 years ago, 25 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,846
@previous (J)
So I'm no geneticist, but is it plausible that moderna, based on genetic research, patented several sequences of DNA that could potentially exist in the future?
So I'm no geneticist, but is it plausible that moderna, based on genetic research, patented several sequences of DNA that could potentially exist in the future?
Anonymous H replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,848
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
You mean like this: https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf
Technically this one is RNA, but yes it is plausible.
You mean like this: https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf
Technically this one is RNA, but yes it is plausible.
Anonymous H double-posted this 4 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,851
@1,157,832 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Yes, people have looked (in depth, to the point of sequencing the entire genome) and no. If there was, Moderna would have been in a massive amount of trouble.
Yes, people have looked (in depth, to the point of sequencing the entire genome) and no. If there was, Moderna would have been in a massive amount of trouble.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 35 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,867
@1,157,832 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
The DNA sequence that the Daily Mail has written about in the article does, in ACTUAL FACT, appear all over the place, in several bacteria, etc, etc. Anonymous H is full of shit
The DNA sequence that the Daily Mail has written about in the article does, in ACTUAL FACT, appear all over the place, in several bacteria, etc, etc. Anonymous H is full of shit
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
Anonymous K double-posted this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,868
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 21 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,875
Anonymous D replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,878
@1,157,868 (K)
@previous (L)
@1,157,867 (K)
@1,157,851 (H)
@1,157,848 (H)
@1,157,846 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@1,157,846 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@1,157,848 (H)
@1,157,720 (War Pigs)
@1,157,722 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
@1,157,731 (D)
@1,157,734 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Lmao that isn't how DNA works
@previous (L)
@1,157,867 (K)
@1,157,851 (H)
@1,157,848 (H)
@1,157,846 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@1,157,846 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@1,157,848 (H)
@1,157,720 (War Pigs)
@1,157,722 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
@1,157,731 (D)
@1,157,734 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Lmao that isn't how DNA works
Anonymous H replied with this 4 years ago, 25 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,887
@1,157,867 (K)
@1,157,868 (K)
@1,157,875 (L)
@previous (D)
Lmao that isn't how DNA works.
Certain sequences are going show up everywhere because there are only 4 possible nucleotides - ATCG, so obviously you're going to get some repetition. Also certain sequences encode for certain proteins that are essential building blocks for viruses and bacteria.
Clearly, Anon K, these are not the sequences to get excited about.
@1,157,868 (K)
@1,157,875 (L)
@previous (D)
Lmao that isn't how DNA works.
Certain sequences are going show up everywhere because there are only 4 possible nucleotides - ATCG, so obviously you're going to get some repetition. Also certain sequences encode for certain proteins that are essential building blocks for viruses and bacteria.
Clearly, Anon K, these are not the sequences to get excited about.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 18 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,157,892
@1,157,867 (K)
@1,157,868 (K)
@1,157,878 (D)
@previous (H)
The mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell. :)
@1,157,868 (K)
@1,157,878 (D)
@previous (H)
The mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell. :)