Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#1,156,135
They have actually talked about their plans, if you had actually watched it. Just so you know!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,140
Biden and Harris are NOT better candidates than Trump and Pence. Not even close!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,143
@1,156,135 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
No...no they haven't. They've blamed Trump for dividing the country...When THEIR trifling asses are the ones who started screaming Impeachment on Inauguration Day.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,146
If Trump wins...maybe we should make blacks slaves again.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,149
@previous (A)
Then that means you'll have to suck white dick for spare change.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,151
@1,156,143 (A)
Trump rose to political prominence by alleging, in the face of a mountain of evidence, that the duly elected President of the United States of America was a foreigner incapable of holding office, and was therefore illegitimate. He ran a campaign demonizing immigrants, muslims and threatening to jail his opponent at every rally he hosted. But that wasn't divisive. What's divisive is when Democrats, with majority public support, impeached the president for soliciting foreign favors to help him with his reelection campaign. Grow up.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,154
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > soliciting foreign favors to help him with his reelection campaign.
Everything he's been accused of, there has been no proven fact he's guilty of it. Did you notice how fast the "Russian Meddling" accusations have all of a sudden disappeared?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,157
@1,156,151 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > Trump rose to political prominence by alleging, in the face of a mountain of evidence, that the duly elected President of the United States of America was a foreigner incapable of holding office
No one wants Open Borders.
Except the Democrats...for an extra 20 million votes.
Fag
You know good and goddamn Well you are a gimp.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
19bitch !1t5yAoqo/E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,165
@1,156,154 (C)
They have not disappeared, they're just being overshadowed and largely ignored by the media. In fact, a bipartisan committee recently has recently concluded that Paul Manafort, a close Trump associate, was effectively working for the Russians, with help from many others within the Trump campaign. When was this report, you may ask? Literally yesterday...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,171
@previous (19bitch !1t5yAoqo/E)
Care to mention why that means two fucks to any one?
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,174
@1,156,154 (C)
I mean, look at many of the people who voted to acquit him lol. For example, Susan Collins:
In its first Article of Impeachment against President Trump, the House asserts that the President abused the power of his presidency. While there are gaps in the record, some key facts are not disputed. It is clear from the July 25, 2019, phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky that the investigation into the Bidens’ activities requested by President Trump was improper and demonstrated very poor judgment.
There is conflicting evidence in the record about the President’s motivation for this improper request. The House Managers stated repeatedly that President Trump’s actions were motivated “solely” for his own political gain in the 2020 campaign, yet the President’s attorneys argued that the President had sound public policy motivations, including a concern about widespread corruption in Ukraine. Regardless, it was wrong for President Trump to mention former Vice President Biden on that phone call, and it was wrong for him to ask a foreign country to investigate a political rival.
The reason he wasn't convicted had nothing to do with the underlying facts. Everyone agreed on those. Republicans just, to put it bluntly, did not even pretend to give a shit lol. Which is fine. If those are the rules, that's fine. Just don't expect a President Biden to be in any way constrained by Democrats in Congress, because Republicans decided that Trump shouldn't be first.
@1,156,157 (A)
Since 1992, Democrats have won the popular vote in 7 out of 8 elections. They do not need more votes lol. This is a dumb conspiracy theory dude. I wish they supported open borders but they don't!
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,178
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Nice wall o' text.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,179
The Democrats deserve to lose, I just wish it wasn't the Republicans they were losing to.
@1,156,140 (A)
You're right but not for the reason you think you are.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 58 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,181
@1,156,174 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > Trump rose to political prominence by alleging, in the face of a mountain of evidence, that the duly elected President of the United States of America was a foreigner incapable of holding office
And yeah...now they have essentially hamstrung the Electoral College...keeping it from possibly doing what it was meant to do.
That was SUCH a DICK move.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,182
@previous (A)
What was the electoral college "meant to do"? And how have "they" (who?) "hamstrung" it?
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,185
@1,156,174 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > Republicans just, to put it bluntly, did not even pretend to give a shit lol
Would that be the same as Democrats not giving a shit when Bill Clinton was accused of sexually assaulting all those women? The democrats swept it under the rug because they didn't give a shit.
When Obama was in office, they discussed closing the border, and all the democrats cheered. Trump actually does something about it, and now the democrats call him racist.
The democrat run cities are in the middle of riots. Why are the republican run cities calm and quiet?
The democrats have been proving these last 3 years they don't give a flying fuck about blacks, or any humans for that matter.
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
19bitch !1t5yAoqo/E replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,186
@1,156,171 (A)
He said something which was misleading, and I refuted it. You guys should be used to that by now...
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,156,187
@1,156,185 (C) > Would that be the same as Democrats not giving a shit when Bill Clinton was accused of sexually assaulting all those women? The democrats swept it under the rug because they didn't give a shit.
Yes. It's pretty clear that Dems should have removed Clinton from office. > When Obama was in office, they discussed closing the border, and all the democrats cheered. Trump actually does something about it, and now the democrats call him racist.
What? > The democrat run cities are in the middle of riots. Why are the republican run cities calm and quiet?
There are like 2 Republican cities of any size in the entire U.S. lol. > The democrats have been proving these last 3 years they don't give a flying fuck about blacks, or any humans for that matter.
They care more than the Republicans! Which is unfortunately all they need to do to be the better party.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,156,201
@1,156,182 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You been under a rock Snake?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,156,203
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,156,210
@1,156,178 (A)
That wasn't a wall of text. Like half of it was just quotes that he even bolded the important parts of.
You need to stop using "the replies are too long" to duck out of political debates when they get too difficult. It makes you look like you're giving up.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,156,213
@1,156,201 (A)
No. I know what the original intended purpose of the Electoral College was. You can read Federalist paper No. 68 and Madison's notes on the constitutional convention if you are curious what the intent was. To sum it up in a sentence or two, the idea was to elect a temporary "Congress" of people from all the states to meet and decide on who the president should be. That system lasted for about two elections before it morphed into the current weird system. He thought the system would actually be a protection against men like Trump - dishonest, vulgar demagogues:
The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States
As it turns out, they didn't actually create something clever here, and were banking on both an absence of political parties and people continuing to identify more with their state than with the country itself (e.g. they expected people to consider themselves Virginians first and Americans second.) Both of those assumptions were wrong, and that is one part of why their system isn't working as well as it was intended to.
I'm not sure what "they" are doing to "hamstring" it though. You can tell me what you mean by that.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,156,214
It did what it need to do in 2016 and I get hard thinking a out how you fucks cant stand it.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,156,215
@previous (A)
Its hard no are you going to beat it and to what tune?