Topic: Trump's brilliant commentary on Kamala Harris
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #102,084
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,153,662
Kamala Harris "radical left", Jesus Christ do any of his retarded fans actually believe the dumb shit he writes?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 32 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,663
Why did a mod edit my post?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 19 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,664
This is actually what I posted before the modabuse.blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,668
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,869
@1,153,662 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
She is Pro Open Borders...Pro gun confiscation...Pro unrestricted Abortion.
She is Pro Open Borders...Pro gun confiscation...Pro unrestricted Abortion.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,978
@previous (D)
She's pro-prison murders for transgender women, too, which seems like it'd be up your alley.
She's pro-prison murders for transgender women, too, which seems like it'd be up your alley.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,154,305
Meta joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 years later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,142
Remember when the democraps were trying to meme this lady into the White House after shambling corpse Biden started sundowning on national TV during the debate??? 😂😂😂
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,143
@1,153,978 (E)
> She's pro-prison murders for transgender women, too, which seems like it'd be up your alley.
And what does that mean? "Pro-prison murderers for transgender women." Is Kamala Harris going up to a maximum security prison with an AR-15 looking for transgender inmates?
> She's pro-prison murders for transgender women, too, which seems like it'd be up your alley.
And what does that mean? "Pro-prison murderers for transgender women." Is Kamala Harris going up to a maximum security prison with an AR-15 looking for transgender inmates?
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,144
HAHAHA IM A MOD AND I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT I LOVE SUCKING PENIS
(Edited 21 minutes later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,145
@1,341,142 (Meta)So, how long after Trump is office will gas drop to 1/2 the cost? and Prime Rib going down by 75% and Lobster even more?
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,146
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,147
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 58 seconds later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,148
@1,341,146 (Meta)
He said "day one". He also said that "on the Election Day" he would end the Ukraine War.
He said "day one". He also said that "on the Election Day" he would end the Ukraine War.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,150
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,151
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 7 seconds later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,152
@1,341,148 (A)He also said when he first won - He would replace Obama Care with a much better plan.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,156
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,173
@previous (A)
Is it not? It's like saying 1≤100 is false.
Oh I forgot your degree is in "languages" not logic 😂🖕
Is it not? It's like saying 1≤100 is false.
Oh I forgot your degree is in "languages" not logic 😂🖕
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,175
@previous (Meta)
Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,177
@1,341,173 (Meta)
Years of War and the Great Depression in America are not enough for a nation that has a strong military presence and has been in a strong military in Europe since World Wars.
Years of War and the Great Depression in America are not enough for a nation that has a strong military presence and has been in a strong military in Europe since World Wars.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 41 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,200
Americans are completely retarded now.
They beg for freedom in Starbucks then complain about high gas prices. The only freedom comes from their own consumerism.
They beg for freedom in Starbucks then complain about high gas prices. The only freedom comes from their own consumerism.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,201
@1,341,175 (J)
> Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
See:
@1,341,151 (Meta)
> I think you will find day one is within the first 100 days.
> Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
See:
@1,341,151 (Meta)
> I think you will find day one is within the first 100 days.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,203
@previous (Meta)
> > Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
>
> See:
>
> > I think you will find day one is within the first 100 days.
You care way too much.
> > Technically, you didn’t say "within the first hundred days." You just said one hundred days.
>
> See:
>
> > I think you will find day one is within the first 100 days.
You care way too much.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,205
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,207
@previous (Meta)
You can’t do math.
100 < 1
See? I’m Chinese, I know what the fuck I’m talking about.
You can’t do math.
100 < 1
See? I’m Chinese, I know what the fuck I’m talking about.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,208
@previous (M)
> 100 < 1
Huh. That looks wrong to me 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Let's ask Kagi FastGPT:
Are you one of those retards that has to wear a bicycle helmet 24/7? 😂😂😂😂😂
> 100 < 1
Huh. That looks wrong to me 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Let's ask Kagi FastGPT:
Okay, let's evaluate the expression 100 < 1: The expression 100 < 1 is a comparison operation that checks if the value 100 is less than the value 1. In mathematics, the less-than operator < returns true if the value on the left is strictly less than the value on the right, and false otherwise. Evaluating 100 < 1: * 100 is not less than 1 * Therefore, the expression 100 < 1 is false So the statement "100 < 1" is false.
Are you one of those retards that has to wear a bicycle helmet 24/7? 😂😂😂😂😂
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,209
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,210
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,211
> 100 < 1
Huh. That looks correct to me 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Let's ask Kagi FastGPT:
Okay, let's evaluate the expression 100 < 1:
The expression 100 < 1 is a comparison operation that checks if the value 100 is less than the value 1.
In mathematics, the less-than operator < returns true if the value on the left is strictly more than the value on the right, and false otherwise.
Evaluating 100 < 1:
* 100 is less than 1
* Therefore, the expression 100 < 1 is true.
So the statement "100 < 1" is true.
Are you one of those geniuses that decides to wear a lab coat every so often? 😂😂😂😂😂
Huh. That looks correct to me 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Let's ask Kagi FastGPT:
Okay, let's evaluate the expression 100 < 1:
The expression 100 < 1 is a comparison operation that checks if the value 100 is less than the value 1.
In mathematics, the less-than operator < returns true if the value on the left is strictly more than the value on the right, and false otherwise.
Evaluating 100 < 1:
* 100 is less than 1
* Therefore, the expression 100 < 1 is true.
So the statement "100 < 1" is true.
Are you one of those geniuses that decides to wear a lab coat every so often? 😂😂😂😂😂
Anonymous M double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,212
You see, you were using the knockoff Chinese GPT made by Americans who don’t know math. I only use high quality American GPT I programmed myself at OpenAI.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,220
@previous (M)
Okay then post what your electric retard coded by H-1B dotheads said. Post what the AI said or fuck off you drunk old nigger 😂🖕
Okay then post what your electric retard coded by H-1B dotheads said. Post what the AI said or fuck off you drunk old nigger 😂🖕
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,223
Anonymous N double-posted this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,225
You know what? Normally I don’t have much empathy for racists, but if something as tiny as 1 < 100 is enough to set you off and you feel like you have to call people slurs over that, maybe you have some emotional stuff you should try and work through. I do know that small things feel a lot worse if your baseline emotional state isn’t great. Not an excuse to be racist, but still. I hope you figure that out.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,227
@1,341,223 (N)
@previous (N)
Anonymous Nigger here is kind enough to set the bottle of malt liquor down and regurgitate something half remembered from the diversity training film shown at his Walmart orientation.
@previous (N)
Anonymous Nigger here is kind enough to set the bottle of malt liquor down and regurgitate something half remembered from the diversity training film shown at his Walmart orientation.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,228
@previous (Meta)
The only reason why I’m not mad at you is because it would feel cruel. You’re saying cruel things but I see that you get very offended by things that are so much less offensive than the things you say… you’re trying to hide it with humor, but no matter what jokes you make it’s just too obvious to me. I have no problem saying hateful things to hateful people, but in your case, I don’t see a hateful person. I just see an extremely sensitive person in denial.
The only reason why I’m not mad at you is because it would feel cruel. You’re saying cruel things but I see that you get very offended by things that are so much less offensive than the things you say… you’re trying to hide it with humor, but no matter what jokes you make it’s just too obvious to me. I have no problem saying hateful things to hateful people, but in your case, I don’t see a hateful person. I just see an extremely sensitive person in denial.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later, 4 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,341,256
@1,341,142 (Meta)
I remember she had like 3 weeks to make her case and for 2 weeks and 6 days it was "vibes" and for the other day it was "I'm not Trump".
I remember she had like 3 weeks to make her case and for 2 weeks and 6 days it was "vibes" and for the other day it was "I'm not Trump".