Topic: How does one disguise their text voice?
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #102,050
I want to be a master of disguise like Dana Carvey.
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,153,365
No such thing as a text voice
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,366
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 31 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,367
blom double-posted this 5 years ago, 25 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,368
Things like "How does one disguise their text voice"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 9 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,369
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,370
Why does it matter when people know it's you?
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,371
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 35 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,375
@1,153,365 (blom)
Disagree. I think it exists in some form, because users posting anonymously can often be identified by it.
IMO, it's something like a combination of favourite topics, tone, and maybe certain typing or grammatical quirks. Some people have quite distinctive text voices, while others have more subtle ones.
Disagree. I think it exists in some form, because users posting anonymously can often be identified by it.
IMO, it's something like a combination of favourite topics, tone, and maybe certain typing or grammatical quirks. Some people have quite distinctive text voices, while others have more subtle ones.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,381
Very carefully.
I bet if I had not used my name here, you would have had no idea that I am I!
I bet if I had not used my name here, you would have had no idea that I am I!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,385
Take up self-introspection. Look at what you're doing and why and it'll help you come to a better understanding of yourself! Hope this helps. <3
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,388
@previous (F)
All introspection is 'self-introspection'. That's what introspection means. :) Anything else would be extraspection!
All introspection is 'self-introspection'. That's what introspection means. :) Anything else would be extraspection!
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,423
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 31 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,430
thank you for referencing the Master of Disguise starring Dana Carvey
beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,554
@1,153,381 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
When I saw the headline, I thought, "I bet Fake anon will reply 'very carefully.'"
When I saw the headline, I thought, "I bet Fake anon will reply 'very carefully.'"
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,595
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,596
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 50 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,606
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,608
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 5 years ago, 23 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,612
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,153,634
@1,153,608 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Very interesting articles! As I suspected, typing style and interests are key indicators. The same factors in the articles hold true on here, I think.
It's an interesting thing for Minichan, since some of our users have very distinctive writeprint features. Like, Syntax and Bert are very easy to identify. But I think you'd have to do some actual research and analysis to identify, say, Fake anon or Triptych posting anonymously, as opposed just relying on familiarity.
@1,153,606 (blom)
No, lad. People can be identified through the characteristics of their writing. Why are you saying this?
Very interesting articles! As I suspected, typing style and interests are key indicators. The same factors in the articles hold true on here, I think.
It's an interesting thing for Minichan, since some of our users have very distinctive writeprint features. Like, Syntax and Bert are very easy to identify. But I think you'd have to do some actual research and analysis to identify, say, Fake anon or Triptych posting anonymously, as opposed just relying on familiarity.
@1,153,606 (blom)
No, lad. People can be identified through the characteristics of their writing. Why are you saying this?
(Edited 1 minute later.)