Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Compassionate release for Bert

beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg started this discussion 5 years ago #101,981

They are letting prisoners out because of COVID.

Why not Bert?

Can I compassionately release Bert from his ban 23 hours ahead of schedule?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Compassionate release 11 46%
No compassionate release 13 54%

Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,152,699

Yes. As a fellow former Minichan convict, I will always argue for my fellows, with one notable exception.

Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,701

I can condone this. The constitution isn’t as clear as it could be, after all, with clause 2 conflicting with clauses 4 and 5

beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 35 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,720

This poll will close in 20 minutes

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,729

Ask Triptych.

beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,735

OK he stays banned!

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,737

@1,152,699 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)

> Yes. As a fellow former Minichan convict, I will always argue for my fellows, with one notable exception.

This comment convinced me to vote "no".

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,739

@1,152,735 (beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg)
How dare you

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,740

@1,152,737 (E)

> > Yes. As a fellow former Minichan convict, I will always argue for my fellows, with one notable exception.
>
> This comment convinced me to vote "no".

Amazing the influence he has on you.

Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,741

@previous (G)
It appears that 10 other people share my opinion.

Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,743

@previous (E)
So?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,759

The vote was 7-0 40 minutes ago, now it's 8-11. What happened?

Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,760

@previous (H)
It should be obvious: 11 people decided that Bert should remain banned.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,761

@previous (E)
11 people decided that Bert should remain banned.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,764

@1,152,699 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
@previous (I)
Two UIDs…

Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,765

@1,152,760 (E)

> It should be obvious: Matt influenced my thinking

fify

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,766

Interesting poll results.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,767

@1,152,765 (G)
Who’s “Matt”?

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,768

@1,152,765 (G)
lol

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,771

@1,152,759 (H)
I suspect i know whom it is, so I won't name names, but one or two of our users are...enthusiastic about voting. So much so, that they will use multiple UIDs to vote like 5+ times in the span of a few minutes for one option. I'm not saying that happened here because I have no way to check, but I'm not saying it didn't happen.

Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,775

@1,152,764 (J)
Solely and specifically to trigger your Autistic obsession. Looks like it worked!

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,785

@1,152,771 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
"Multiple UIDs", you say.

19bitch !/nxYguuEzA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,789

@1,152,771 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's those pesky liberals with their Mail-In Voting.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 0 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,790

@1,152,785 (L)
Something you might know a thing or two (or three) about!

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,792

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I don't have "multiple UIDs".

Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY replied with this 5 years ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,795

@1,152,771 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Wow, do you think they also vote as male in polls and then vote as female in other polls?!

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,799

@1,152,792 (L)
In a previous thread ypu posted from 2 UIDs with the same IP address, and then created a new third one so you could criticize another user for using 2 UIDs in a thread. These are also not your only 3 UIDs. I dont know why you are pushing me on this.

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,800

@1,152,795 (Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY)
That, I believe, is the question of the century.

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,801

@1,152,799 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That's not true. You must be mistaken.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,803

A couple of Covid released prisoners raped and killed while out

Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,804

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Maybe they should have prioritized non-violent offenders

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,805

@previous (Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY)
Right??

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,806

@1,152,799 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What it should be is: you can use as many UIDs in a topic as you want, but each subsequent UID after the first on the same IP in that topic has a picture of a sockpuppet forcibly attached to it.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,152,808

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I wouldn't be opposed to that but it's trivially easy to change an IP address. If you have a VPN you can do it with like 2 clicks.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.