Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later[^][v]#1,151,304
Then I genuinely pity you...
Green !StaYqkzUPc double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,151,305
But technically yes, although it's a bad idea.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,151,306
That's a question you can ask your doctor next time you go to see them about your alcohol-ruined liver.
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,151,307
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
My liver is back in normal range, thank you, thanks to the Sinclair™ method.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,151,312
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Sure it is.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,345
@1,151,307 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Congrats! Overcoming alcoholism is not easy.
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,353
@1,151,312 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It is, but I guess you know more than my doctor about me, right? @previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Thank you.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 9 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,390
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
You seem a bit defensive. All I said was "sure it is". You inserted a sarcastic tone.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 34 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,392
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
He's ashamed of his health. That's why he created this topic without using his name.
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,423
@1,151,390 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You know exactly what you meant. You are delusional.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,460
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
You're being histrionic. Can't even read a simple neutral statement without inserting a negative attitude because you have to feel like everyone is constantly attacking and/or stalking you.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,461
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Looking at this purely objectively, your statement "Sure it is." is most often said in sarcasm and/or disbelief, especially when used on its own. Kind of like "Yeah right." but more mild. I wouldn't call it "neutral".
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,465
@1,151,460 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Tell me that you did not mean that sarcastically. It is a sarcastic statement. People do not say, "Sure, it is" literally.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,467
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,468
@1,151,461 (F)
I actually use it as a positive statement pretty frequently. How else would I agree with something?
@1,151,465 (A)
I mean I have no way to know what your liver is like so i have no reason to make a sarcastic statement like that. It was just a throwaway comment, I wasn't expecting it to get this much attention.
And people absolutely do use it literally. You just don't notice it as much because sarcasm makes more of a mental impact.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,469
@1,151,465 (A)
You went back to being anonymous again. You must really be ashamed of yourself.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,471
@1,151,465 (A)
I mean, christ, sarcasm hinges on using positive statements. You say something positive in a tone that implies you actually mean something negative. Thus there is no such thing as a sarcastic statement, because sarcasm is a tone. And because tone is incredibly difficult to communicate or discern over text, I avoid it completely when I type.
In summary: No, you're being histrionic. You are inserting a sarcastic tone onto a neutral statement because you have a need to constantly feel like people are attacking or stalking you. In other words, to satisfy your victim complex.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 43 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,481
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It sounded more like you said it with irony than sarcasm
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,483
@1,151,469 (E)
Solely and specifically to trigger your Autistic obsession. Looks like it worked!
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,484
@1,151,471 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Then just answer the simple question. When I stated my liver was back to normal, and you replied, "Sure it is," you were affirming your belief that I was telling the truth? Or, were you being sarcastic? Just answer.
Apocalypse Indy™ !fvna3QzWVM joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,491
@previous (A)
You don't fucking know me, asshole. At my lowest point, I was blowing my family fortune on expensive wine every night. It got to the point where I associated with criminal elements just to get ahold of motor exotic wine. I have fucking been there so I know alcoholism when I see it.
Just Google "The Sinclair Method". It will help you, I swear.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,494
@1,151,484 (A)
Neither. It was a throwaway remark with no meaning. I had an inkling you would freak out like this.
@1,151,481 (H)
"sounded like". Yeah, that's my point - there is no tone in text, the reader inserts the tone. When there's context, that usually helps interpret what the author meant, but that was completely contextless.
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,495
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
That's sarcasm now, I can tell.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,151,502