Topic: Closing pubs to open schools? What the hell? Where is he correlation?
Green !StaYqkzUPc started this discussion 5 years ago #101,769
I hate pubs but even I think this is stupid.
Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,149,426
It's the teachers union. They are holding the country to ransom. Fucking unions and fuck lazy teachers who just want a longer summer holiday
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,429
Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,433
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The UK gov wants the schools to open, the teachers unions don't even though it's safe to do so.
The UK gov wants the schools to open, the teachers unions don't even though it's safe to do so.
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,434
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,449
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,466
The lockdown was always a power grab. They're fucking with you because they can.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,467
Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 5 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,468
@1,149,434 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
There is no recorded case of a child passing COVID-19 onto a teacher.
There is no recorded case of a child passing COVID-19 onto a teacher.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,470
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,475
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,480
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
But what on earth does this have to do with pubs, since children don't go to pubs? ?
But what on earth does this have to do with pubs, since children don't go to pubs? ?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,481
Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,483
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Every school in every country? There is no recorded case of a child passing COVID-19 to a teacher, worldwide. Not saying it never happens but schools are safer than shops, pubs and th common workplace yet, thanks to unions they remain closed.
Every school in every country? There is no recorded case of a child passing COVID-19 to a teacher, worldwide. Not saying it never happens but schools are safer than shops, pubs and th common workplace yet, thanks to unions they remain closed.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,506
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,515
dw double-posted this 5 years ago, 53 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,516
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,521
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,528
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE double-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,531
@1,149,515 (dw)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/07/31/new-evidence-suggests-young-children-spread-covid-19-more-efficiently-than-adults/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/07/31/new-evidence-suggests-young-children-spread-covid-19-more-efficiently-than-adults/
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 46 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,536
@1,149,521 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)Well, we haven't seen an increase in infections from reopening the schools sooo
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Hmmm. Why doesn't that study mention the schools that are open, and how it has affected the R number there? The only thing it seems to provide evidence for is young children having higher quantities of virus once they get infected.
The Forbes writer then decided that's conclusive evidence of them being more infectious, whilst ignoring real world evidence that's not the case. The 0-17 group are 20% of the population and 1% of total covid 19 patients.
Pic is test results for daycare and primary school workers.
https://www.rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/children-and-covid-19
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 17 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,786
@previous (dw)
> The only thing it seems to provide evidence for is young children having higher quantities of virus once they get infected.
Thus being more infectious. Which is all the study was investigating.
> The only thing it seems to provide evidence for is young children having higher quantities of virus once they get infected.
Thus being more infectious. Which is all the study was investigating.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,790
@1,149,536 (dw)
> Well, we haven't seen an increase in infections from reopening the schools sooo
>
>
> Hmmm. Why doesn't that study mention the schools that are open, and how it has affected the R number there? The only thing it seems to provide evidence for is young children having higher quantities of virus once they get infected.
> The Forbes writer then decided that's conclusive evidence of them being more infectious, whilst ignoring real world evidence that's not the case. The 0-17 group are 20% of the population and 1% of total covid 19 patients.
>
> Pic is test results for daycare and primary school workers.
> https://www.rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/children-and-covid-19
Idiot.
> Well, we haven't seen an increase in infections from reopening the schools sooo
>
>
> Hmmm. Why doesn't that study mention the schools that are open, and how it has affected the R number there? The only thing it seems to provide evidence for is young children having higher quantities of virus once they get infected.
> The Forbes writer then decided that's conclusive evidence of them being more infectious, whilst ignoring real world evidence that's not the case. The 0-17 group are 20% of the population and 1% of total covid 19 patients.
>
> Pic is test results for daycare and primary school workers.
> https://www.rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/children-and-covid-19
Idiot.
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,149,810
@1,149,786 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
as per the link i posted, they're the group with the least infections though. they also have dont social distance or wear masks. they have also not massively infected their teeachers.
as per the link i posted, they're the group with the least infections though. they also have dont social distance or wear masks. they have also not massively infected their teeachers.