> Irrelevant. Scatman CLAIMED to be African, but when I Skyped him, it was only audio, not visual. That proves nothing. Sorry.
The entire foundation stone of this shtick of yours has been that you and you alone know every single detail about Scatman, including that he is African (a claim you were asserting just 2 days ago). Now you're going to start walking all this "knowledge" of yours back as each piece of it gets contradicted?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 41 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,064
What basis do you have to think this? That they both know more about Christianity than you? You're not so knowledgeable that it's unthinkable that two people know more about a given subject than you do.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,076
Scatman was Kimmo. See scatman’s use of ipredator.se VPN
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,081
Again, it's just his dumb shtick. If today I make a post about, for example, the Tuscan countryside, Matt will say "Scatman also loved the Tuscan countryside". If I make a post about Indian cuisine, he'll say "Scatman also loved Indian cuisine". If I say I was swimming today, he'll say "Scatman also liked to swim on Wednesdays". He figures he's hit upon an ingeniously irrefutable new way of claiming someone is someone else: making unverifiable claims.
I know what you're thinking, you're thinking: "But isn't that kind of dumb and obvious?" And the answer is: "Yes. It's Matt".
And yeah, for future reference, any level of general knowledge which is higher than a 6-year-old's is what Matt considers to be expert understanding of arcane subjects. He's kind of dim.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,083
@1,148,064 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Remember, Matt is an online university graduate. He knows everything, and everything we say or do, is wrong.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,084
> Remember, Matt is an online university graduate.
I doubt even that to be honest. He's made up everything else about his life, I see no reason to believe his 'degree' is any different to his pregnant wife né Chinese girlfriend.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,104
From what I recall, Scatman was just an Aldi knockoff version of Matt. Said he knew French, liked faeces, etc.
I think he developed his persona a bit after he created Scatchan, but that website was non-canon so I do not really know or care about it.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 44 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,123
@1,148,064 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It's his narcissism. A normal person would say something like "I speak pretty good French". Matt has to be the world's foremost leading expert on French, so terrifyingly proficient and knowledgeable (in his own mind) that the only reason the Academie Francaise didn't hire him was that he would expose their own ignorance (why Matt never got a job in France or as a French translator is left as an exercise for the reader).
So if someone knows more about Catholicism than Matt, it's a huge deal. If two people know more about Catholicism than Matt, they must actually be the same person since no one knows more about Catholicism than Matt.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,165
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I concluded pretty much the same thing. Matt's ego is immense (and shockingly fragile). I wanted to hear his justification, though. It's interesting to see the convolutions he goes through to make it seem like he's actually a reasonable person.
> Matt has to be the world's foremost leading expert on French, so terrifyingly proficient and knowledgeable (in his own mind) that the only reason the Academie Francaise didn't hire him was that he would expose their own ignorance (why Matt never got a job in France or as a French translator is left as an exercise for the reader).
Is that a real example of a thing he said or just a description of his ego?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,148,167
Ba-da-ba-da-ba-be bop bop bodda bope
Bop ba bodda bope
Be bop ba bodda bope
Bop ba bodda