Topic: What do you call people who attack heavily armed police?
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #101,614
In USAmerica they are called Democrats...
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 52 seconds later[^] [v] #1,147,431
Liberals did 9/11!!!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,433
Apparently they are called peaceful protesters as well.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,434
In 1776 they were called patriots.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,438
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 41 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,439
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,440
@OP
> In USAmerica they are called Democrats...
And what do we call a heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House so that the guy who cheated on his 1st wife with his 2nd wife and then cheated on his 2nd wife with his 3rd wife and then cheated on his pregnant 3rd wife with a porn star who he lied about paying off could pander to gullible rednecks by posing outside a church holding up a Bible he's never read a single page of?
> In USAmerica they are called Democrats...
And what do we call a heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House so that the guy who cheated on his 1st wife with his 2nd wife and then cheated on his 2nd wife with his 3rd wife and then cheated on his pregnant 3rd wife with a porn star who he lied about paying off could pander to gullible rednecks by posing outside a church holding up a Bible he's never read a single page of?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,441
Definitely pack animals. Like wolves as or hyenas.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,442
@1,147,440 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House
Proof?
> heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House
Proof?
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,443
@1,147,440 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Would you rather live next door to a gent that couldnt stick to the same one piece of cootchie for years at a time or a degenerate thug who might bust in and steal everything you got and then burn it down when he's done because he got enraged about what his liberal puppet media Masters told him he should be enraged about??
Would you rather live next door to a gent that couldnt stick to the same one piece of cootchie for years at a time or a degenerate thug who might bust in and steal everything you got and then burn it down when he's done because he got enraged about what his liberal puppet media Masters told him he should be enraged about??
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,444
@1,147,440 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> holding up a Bible he's never read a single page of?
Can you prove this as well?
> holding up a Bible he's never read a single page of?
Can you prove this as well?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,448
@1,147,443 (G)
Were you similarly outraged when police marauded through a neighbourhood shouting "light 'em up" and firing paint at citizens standing on their own porch, or are you only afraid of authoritarianism when it's Trump telling you the commies are coming for your guns?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/light-em-up-officers-fire-paint-rounds-at-people-on-porch-while-enforcing-curfew/vi-BB14VAZB
Were you similarly outraged when police marauded through a neighbourhood shouting "light 'em up" and firing paint at citizens standing on their own porch, or are you only afraid of authoritarianism when it's Trump telling you the commies are coming for your guns?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/light-em-up-officers-fire-paint-rounds-at-people-on-porch-while-enforcing-curfew/vi-BB14VAZB
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,457
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,470
@1,147,448 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
While enforcing a curfew
Bravo!
Nice one sentence 'news story'
While enforcing a curfew
Bravo!
Nice one sentence 'news story'
Anonymous G double-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,471
@1,147,448 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
A response is called for when people in an area won't obey a curfew.
I guess you think LE should have enticed them to cooperate by handing out lollipops.
A response is called for when people in an area won't obey a curfew.
I guess you think LE should have enticed them to cooperate by handing out lollipops.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,473
@1,147,470 (G)
@previous (G)
The cops were sent to attack the protesters before the curfew began dude.
@previous (G)
The cops were sent to attack the protesters before the curfew began dude.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,474
@1,147,448 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts? Thanks. That will be all.
Also...
> holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
Again, can you prove this?
Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts? Thanks. That will be all.
Also...
> holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
Again, can you prove this?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,476
@1,147,471 (G)
> A response is called for when people in an area won't obey a curfew.
>
> I guess you think LE should have enticed them to cooperate by handing out lollipops.
If the police are deployed to force people to wear face masks and shoot at anyone not complying, will you be ok with this?
> A response is called for when people in an area won't obey a curfew.
>
> I guess you think LE should have enticed them to cooperate by handing out lollipops.
If the police are deployed to force people to wear face masks and shoot at anyone not complying, will you be ok with this?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 5 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,477
@1,147,442 (C)
> >heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House
>
> Proof?
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/27/politics/white-house-protest-church/index.html
> >heavily armed military who attack peaceful protesters outside the White House
>
> Proof?
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/27/politics/white-house-protest-church/index.html
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,478
@1,147,474 (C)
I mean...do you think that Donald "Two Corinthians" Trump who went to a church led by Norman Vincent Peale has ever opened a Bible? I'd be surprised if he knew the names of the four gospels.
I mean...do you think that Donald "Two Corinthians" Trump who went to a church led by Norman Vincent Peale has ever opened a Bible? I'd be surprised if he knew the names of the four gospels.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,479
@1,147,474 (C)
> >holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
>
> Again, can you prove this?
Of course.
> >holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
>
> Again, can you prove this?
Of course.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,481
@1,147,474 (C)
> Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts?
It's a video you dipshit.
> Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts?
It's a video you dipshit.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,485
@1,147,479 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Of course
Then do so.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts?
>
> It's a video you dipshit.
Videos can be altered, just like pictures.
Were you there? Did you witness this as it was happening?
> Of course
Then do so.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Oh, you read it on the news. So you have no actual facts?
>
> It's a video you dipshit.
Videos can be altered, just like pictures.
Were you there? Did you witness this as it was happening?
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,488
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,498
@1,147,473 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Headline- 'Light 'em up': Officers fire paint rounds at people on porch WHILE ENFORCING CURFEW
Headline- 'Light 'em up': Officers fire paint rounds at people on porch WHILE ENFORCING CURFEW
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,500
@previous (G)
Oh that instance of police abuse. I was thining of the Lafayette park one. Citizens were legally allowed to be on their porches because it is their property. This was confirmed by the authorities later (after people's rights had been violated).
Oh that instance of police abuse. I was thining of the Lafayette park one. Citizens were legally allowed to be on their porches because it is their property. This was confirmed by the authorities later (after people's rights had been violated).
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,504
@1,147,476 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
If AOC gave birth to a hideous gargoyle looking creature which had the eyes of Chuck Schumer, the nose of Adam Schiff and the mouth of Cory Booker...would you be ok with this?
If AOC gave birth to a hideous gargoyle looking creature which had the eyes of Chuck Schumer, the nose of Adam Schiff and the mouth of Cory Booker...would you be ok with this?
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,506
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,507
@1,147,504 (G)
Answer the question I asked you:
@1,147,476 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> If the police are deployed to force people to wear face masks and shoot at anyone not complying, will you be ok with this?
For a bonus prize, answer this further question: what if it's a Democrat governor who orders them to do it?
Answer the question I asked you:
@1,147,476 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> If the police are deployed to force people to wear face masks and shoot at anyone not complying, will you be ok with this?
For a bonus prize, answer this further question: what if it's a Democrat governor who orders them to do it?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,508
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,514
@previous (G)
Until you've answered it we can't know if it's "apples to oranges". Why are you so reluctant to answer such a basic question?
Until you've answered it we can't know if it's "apples to oranges". Why are you so reluctant to answer such a basic question?
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,519
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
When shall you answer the comment below?
@1,147,479 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > >holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
> >
> > Again, can you prove this?
>
> Of course.
When shall you answer the comment below?
@1,147,479 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > >holding up a bible he's never read a single page of?
> >
> > Again, can you prove this?
>
> Of course.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,520
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,522
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,523
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 11 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,524
I meant are you present? Will you please post a timestamped pic of your hands, palms down?@1,147,522 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,526
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,527
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I am asking if you will please post a timestamped pic of one of your hands, palm down?
I am asking if you will please post a timestamped pic of one of your hands, palm down?
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,528
@1,147,523 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> When Anon G answers my question.
My question came before your question to him. If you don't have an answer, then just say so.
> When Anon G answers my question.
My question came before your question to him. If you don't have an answer, then just say so.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,529
@1,147,527 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I am asking if you will please post a timestamped pic of one of your hands, palm down?
Why do you want me to do that, and what in this thread made you think to ask me it?
> I am asking if you will please post a timestamped pic of one of your hands, palm down?
Why do you want me to do that, and what in this thread made you think to ask me it?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,530
@1,147,528 (C)
> My question came before your question to him.
No it didn't. Here is my question to him:
@1,147,476 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Here is your question asking when I would post proof:
@1,147,519 (C)
Prior to that you issued a demand and I don't respond to demands. Now be patient and wait your turn.
> My question came before your question to him.
No it didn't. Here is my question to him:
@1,147,476 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Here is your question asking when I would post proof:
@1,147,519 (C)
Prior to that you issued a demand and I don't respond to demands. Now be patient and wait your turn.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,531
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,532
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 29 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,533
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,535
@1,147,532 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)> Because it will prove to Matt that you aren't Larkin
Ah ok, I understand you now.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,536
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,537
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,538
@1,147,536 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You aren't him
Matt has already seen a picture of his hand. There was that whole tedious thread talking about his wedding ring, and how can a Catholic priest be married and so on... unless that wasn't Matt?
> You aren't him
Matt has already seen a picture of his hand. There was that whole tedious thread talking about his wedding ring, and how can a Catholic priest be married and so on... unless that wasn't Matt?
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 31 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,540
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 13 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,541
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,001
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,007
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,018
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,028
@1,147,536 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
But have you ever seen a signed pic that you believed was Larkin's hand?
But have you ever seen a signed pic that you believed was Larkin's hand?
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,031
@1,147,533 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Your lack of knowledge is very likely a contributing factor to your stupidity.
Your lack of knowledge is very likely a contributing factor to your stupidity.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,032
@1,147,535 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
What does your wife think about you pretending to be a Catholic priest on a bulletin board
What does your wife think about you pretending to be a Catholic priest on a bulletin board
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,037
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,050
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,075
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,148,090
@1,148,037 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I knew that's what has been said, duhr.
What I'm sayin is the photographic representation of that. Or is was it accepted as fact merely because he said so.
I knew that's what has been said, duhr.
What I'm sayin is the photographic representation of that. Or is was it accepted as fact merely because he said so.