Topic: Madam Speaker...The President of the United States!
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #101,592
"So, the last time I was at the hospital, well, probably a year ago, a little less than a year ago, I asked the doctor. I said: 'Is there some kind of a cognitive test that I could take? Because I have been hearing about it, because I want to shut these people up.'
They're - they're fake news. They make up stories. I mean, like, I will do an interview with you. You I didn't say you can ask me about this, you can't -- I say, ask me anything. I did one with Chris Wallace.
He was nice enough to say. He said, I just want to tell the audience there was no question that's off bounds, OK? And he's a tough cookie. And it was a good interview. I liked it. I enjoyed it. And it was good.
But I didn't say, you can only ask this. You can only -- we have to be sharp. If you're in the office of the presidency, we have to be sharp.
So, they were saying all these different things. It was going all over, whichever stuck. None of it stuck, fortunately. But one of the reasons it didn't is that I took a test. I said to the doctor it was Dr. Ronny Jackson - I said: 'Is there some kind of a test, an acuity test?'
And he said: 'There actually is.' And he named it, whatever it might be. And it was 30 or 35 questions. The first questions are very easy. The last questions are much more difficult, like a memory question. It's like, you will go person, woman, man, camera, TV.
So, they say, could you repeat that? So, I said, yes. So, it's person, woman, man, camera, TV. OK, that's very good.
"If you get it in order, you get extra points. If you OK, now he's asking you other questions, other questions. And then 10 minutes, 15, 20 minutes later, they say, remember the first question, not the first, but the 10th question? Give us that again. Can you do that again? And you go, person, woman, man, camera TV. If you get it in order, you get extra points.
They said, nobody gets it in order. It's actually not that easy. But, for me, it was easy.
And that's not an easy question. In other words, they ask you to -- they give you five names, and you have to repeat them. And that's OK. If you repeat them out of order, it's OK, but you know, it's not as good.
But then, when you go back, about 20, 25 minutes later, and they say, go back to that question -- they don't tell you this. Go back to that question, and repeat them. Can you do it? And you go, person, woman, man, camera, TV.
They say: 'That's amazing. How did you do that?' I do it because I have, like, a good memory, because I'm cognitively there"
They're - they're fake news. They make up stories. I mean, like, I will do an interview with you. You I didn't say you can ask me about this, you can't -- I say, ask me anything. I did one with Chris Wallace.
He was nice enough to say. He said, I just want to tell the audience there was no question that's off bounds, OK? And he's a tough cookie. And it was a good interview. I liked it. I enjoyed it. And it was good.
But I didn't say, you can only ask this. You can only -- we have to be sharp. If you're in the office of the presidency, we have to be sharp.
So, they were saying all these different things. It was going all over, whichever stuck. None of it stuck, fortunately. But one of the reasons it didn't is that I took a test. I said to the doctor it was Dr. Ronny Jackson - I said: 'Is there some kind of a test, an acuity test?'
And he said: 'There actually is.' And he named it, whatever it might be. And it was 30 or 35 questions. The first questions are very easy. The last questions are much more difficult, like a memory question. It's like, you will go person, woman, man, camera, TV.
So, they say, could you repeat that? So, I said, yes. So, it's person, woman, man, camera, TV. OK, that's very good.
"If you get it in order, you get extra points. If you OK, now he's asking you other questions, other questions. And then 10 minutes, 15, 20 minutes later, they say, remember the first question, not the first, but the 10th question? Give us that again. Can you do that again? And you go, person, woman, man, camera TV. If you get it in order, you get extra points.
They said, nobody gets it in order. It's actually not that easy. But, for me, it was easy.
And that's not an easy question. In other words, they ask you to -- they give you five names, and you have to repeat them. And that's OK. If you repeat them out of order, it's OK, but you know, it's not as good.
But then, when you go back, about 20, 25 minutes later, and they say, go back to that question -- they don't tell you this. Go back to that question, and repeat them. Can you do it? And you go, person, woman, man, camera, TV.
They say: 'That's amazing. How did you do that?' I do it because I have, like, a good memory, because I'm cognitively there"
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Coil E. Leafeon !QnI1ArmPmY joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,147,177
You need to be a very stable genius to remember these in order, better to write them downAnonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,193
Historians are going to be laughing about this for the next 100 years.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,196
Me remember five words! Me are stabul genius!
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,216
Jeeeesus christ. It was a test for signs of dementia.
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,219
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,228
I started noticing his little "stories" when he went to the hospital and made up a story of how he told his wife. These stories always have a timeline. First this, then that. There's always a conversation in them, which he repeats in detail. Always, and I repeat always the other person says how amazing he is and his behaviour is perfect.
When Obama was president I thought that he was normal. Obviously the guy loves to drone strike Afghan weddings and shit, but he was in the "normal human" category. Same with Bush, Clinton, the other Bush, Reagan and Carter. None of them made me wonder about the structure of his brain or a flow chart of his ego.
Not so with Trump. I can't listen to him without wondering what is brain is doing and whether the registers or address bus is broken.
When Obama was president I thought that he was normal. Obviously the guy loves to drone strike Afghan weddings and shit, but he was in the "normal human" category. Same with Bush, Clinton, the other Bush, Reagan and Carter. None of them made me wonder about the structure of his brain or a flow chart of his ego.
Not so with Trump. I can't listen to him without wondering what is brain is doing and whether the registers or address bus is broken.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,233
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,236
@previous (G)
I wouldn't take it either because it has a memory test and I am crap with them. Imagine if Biden got 29.9/30 and Trump got 30. We'd never hear the last of it. Just like we heard "lock her up" and "build a wall". Neither of which has happened.
I wouldn't take it either because it has a memory test and I am crap with them. Imagine if Biden got 29.9/30 and Trump got 30. We'd never hear the last of it. Just like we heard "lock her up" and "build a wall". Neither of which has happened.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,239
Anonymous G double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,241
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,244
@1,147,239 (G)
> Lots of Wall built and continuing to be built every Monday-Friday.
The thing is that the wall has been built for a while now, just really slowly. There's a vice news I think story on it on YouTube that's at least 5 years old. It's too expensive to be built quickly, it's going to take maybe a century. Also Trump said that Mexico would pay for it, which obviously hasn't happened.
> Lots of Wall built and continuing to be built every Monday-Friday.
The thing is that the wall has been built for a while now, just really slowly. There's a vice news I think story on it on YouTube that's at least 5 years old. It's too expensive to be built quickly, it's going to take maybe a century. Also Trump said that Mexico would pay for it, which obviously hasn't happened.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,248
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,252
@previous (G)
> Stopped reading at vice news.
Their YouTube channel has good quality videos once in a while. I ignore the endless drug ones.
> Stopped reading at vice news.
Their YouTube channel has good quality videos once in a while. I ignore the endless drug ones.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 22 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,583
@1,147,241 (G)
He was a peanut farmer! From...Georgia? Idk
He sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
He was a peanut farmer! From...Georgia? Idk
He sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,586
Anonymous G double-posted this 5 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,589
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 13 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,590
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,591
Carter is a good man. He has spent decades supporting Habitat for Humanity.
Regrettably he was a Democrat but he is definently one of the greatest men to ever be President.
Regrettably he was a Democrat but he is definently one of the greatest men to ever be President.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,592
@1,147,589 (G)
What? Who's talking shit? What are you talking about?
I said Carter sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
I think it was very good and honourable of Carter to do that.
What? Who's talking shit? What are you talking about?
I said Carter sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
I think it was very good and honourable of Carter to do that.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,593
@previous (E)
> What? Who's talking shit? What are you talking about?
> I said Carter sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
> It's very telling how you're so sensitive that you interpret any mention of Trump as an attack and must immediately leap to his defense.
You are a sorry liberal cull. Deal with it.
> What? Who's talking shit? What are you talking about?
> I said Carter sold his peanut farm when he became president to avoid conflicts of interest. I wonder if Trump has done that.
> It's very telling how you're so sensitive that you interpret any mention of Trump as an attack and must immediately leap to his defense.
You are a sorry liberal cull. Deal with it.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,595
@previous (G)
Wait, who did you think i was talking shit about? I'm so confused. I didn't say anything positive or negative about anyone in that first post.
Wait, who did you think i was talking shit about? I'm so confused. I didn't say anything positive or negative about anyone in that first post.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E double-posted this 5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,597
@1,147,593 (G)
I'm an individual. I'm a whole cult, all by myself? That's very impressive and I'm proud of myself.
I'm an individual. I'm a whole cult, all by myself? That's very impressive and I'm proud of myself.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,599
@1,147,591 (G)
I did not expect Carter praise from you but I actually agree with you on this. He is one of the few presidents that was actually a genuinely good human being.
I did not expect Carter praise from you but I actually agree with you on this. He is one of the few presidents that was actually a genuinely good human being.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,613
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I don't know much about him but everything I've heard has been positive. He's still building homes with Habitat for Humanity in his 90s! What a lovely guy.
I'm just baffled that bert interpreted that one post as shit-talking. I'm not even sure who I was supposedly talking shit about, although I initially assumed Trump
I don't know much about him but everything I've heard has been positive. He's still building homes with Habitat for Humanity in his 90s! What a lovely guy.
I'm just baffled that bert interpreted that one post as shit-talking. I'm not even sure who I was supposedly talking shit about, although I initially assumed Trump
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,616
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I often misconstrue positions from my adversaries incorrectly.
I am not totally perfect..
I often misconstrue positions from my adversaries incorrectly.
I am not totally perfect..
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,147,618
@previous (G)
Who did you think i was talking shit about?
And aww, you consider me an adversary, I'm flattered.
Who did you think i was talking shit about?
And aww, you consider me an adversary, I'm flattered.