Topic: Trump's cognitive test LOL
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #101,436
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,145,268
> Trump boasted that doctors were “very surprised” that he “aced” the cognitive test
?
?
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,269
Sounds like he did better than you. You can't even remember the topic you made about it last week ?
http://minichan.org/topic/101146
http://minichan.org/topic/101146
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,271
The fact that he thinks a test used to diagnose dementia is so difficult says a lot more than he wants it to.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,281
Oh, this is NEWS but what Biden used his office to do for his son isnt?
WoW.
WoW.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Gaz from Lewisham replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,290
@previous (E)
> Oh, this is NEWS but what Biden used his office to do for his son isnt?
>
>
> WoW.
I reckon you're right Bert mate. It's corrupt as fuck how Biden used his position to enrich his kid.
Hey Bert mate, how awesome is it that China awarded a bunch of conveniently-timed trademarks to Ivanka Trump's struggling business back in 2018?
> Oh, this is NEWS but what Biden used his office to do for his son isnt?
>
>
> WoW.
I reckon you're right Bert mate. It's corrupt as fuck how Biden used his position to enrich his kid.
Hey Bert mate, how awesome is it that China awarded a bunch of conveniently-timed trademarks to Ivanka Trump's struggling business back in 2018?
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,293
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,295
@1,145,281 (E)
Do you have a strong principled objection to politicians using their office to get their kids and family members jobs they would not otherwise be qualified for?
Do you have a strong principled objection to politicians using their office to get their kids and family members jobs they would not otherwise be qualified for?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,300
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,375
@1,145,281 (E)You think THAT is news. Mitch McConnell wore a fucking TAN SUIT to the oval office. What fucking prick. I bet he uses Dijon mustard too, that fascist.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,377
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 54 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,400
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,560
@1,145,281 (E)
> Oh, this is NEWS but what Biden used his office to do for his son isnt?
>
>
> WoW.
I did hear about that in the news, around the time that I heard that Trump threatened to withhold money unless Ukraine made some public comment about it at the very least.
So it's only bad to use your power to get family members jobs when you aren't president yet is the message I get from you
> Oh, this is NEWS but what Biden used his office to do for his son isnt?
>
>
> WoW.
I did hear about that in the news, around the time that I heard that Trump threatened to withhold money unless Ukraine made some public comment about it at the very least.
So it's only bad to use your power to get family members jobs when you aren't president yet is the message I get from you
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 44 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,567
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
There was never evidence that Trump did that though. Saying it happened like that is not proof.
There WAS a video of Biden doing the same type of thing however. Yep. That is called proof.
There was never evidence that Trump did that though. Saying it happened like that is not proof.
There WAS a video of Biden doing the same type of thing however. Yep. That is called proof.
(Edited 51 seconds later.)
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 32 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,145,597
@previous (E)
> There was never evidence that Trump did that though. Saying it happened like that is not proof.
>
> There WAS a video of Biden doing the same type of thing however. Yep. That is called proof.
you're talking horseshit now, look it up or fuck off
> There was never evidence that Trump did that though. Saying it happened like that is not proof.
>
> There WAS a video of Biden doing the same type of thing however. Yep. That is called proof.
you're talking horseshit now, look it up or fuck off