Topic: Liberals desperate to nitpick and blame Trump about every aspect of pandemic situations
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #101,281
Of course they are, lol.
After the failed impeachment with hunt and all the other bullshit they feel they have to hide the truth that he has been a truly great President.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/
After the failed impeachment with hunt and all the other bullshit they feel they have to hide the truth that he has been a truly great President.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,143,450
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,451
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,452
What have the Democrats done?
Whine about Trump for 4 years.
Whine about Trump for 4 years.
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,455
Witness the democrats and their insane campaign of hate
https://www.adn.com/opinions/letters/2020/05/11/letter-trumps-great-accomplishments/
https://www.adn.com/opinions/letters/2020/05/11/letter-trumps-great-accomplishments/
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,461
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 31 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,466
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
If you keep posting members of your family, I'm going to recommend a ban.
If you keep posting members of your family, I'm going to recommend a ban.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,682
> More Americans are now employed than ever recorded before in our history.
Do you really believe that? Unemployment is hitting record highs, isn't it?
Do you really believe that? Unemployment is hitting record highs, isn't it?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,683
> Record number of regulations eliminated
That's not a good thing! Regulations are there for a reason, to protect people!
That's not a good thing! Regulations are there for a reason, to protect people!
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL triple-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,685
> Withdrew the United States from the job-killing Paris Climate Accord.
Wow yeah fuck climate change, we don't need the planet
Wow yeah fuck climate change, we don't need the planet
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,686
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,143,687
Blocked funding for any organisation that performs abortion.
Made it legal for companies to refuse to cover birth control or abortion in their health insurance.
Banned trans people from the military.
Banned trans kids from using their chosen bathroom.
Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures"
Made minors get permission from their parents to get abortions.
K im sick of reading this bullshit
Made it legal for companies to refuse to cover birth control or abortion in their health insurance.
Banned trans people from the military.
Banned trans kids from using their chosen bathroom.
Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures"
Made minors get permission from their parents to get abortions.
K im sick of reading this bullshit
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 22 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,022
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
All of that is what decent citizens want a President to do. Thanks.
All of that is what decent citizens want a President to do. Thanks.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 57 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,038
@previous (A)
What happened to Republicans being the party of small government and free choice? All of that is needless legislation for the government to limit free choice.
If you accidentally knocked up a chick, i bet you'd want her to get an abortion. I doubt you'd help raise that child in any case, probably dodge child support like a scumbag.
What happened to Republicans being the party of small government and free choice? All of that is needless legislation for the government to limit free choice.
If you accidentally knocked up a chick, i bet you'd want her to get an abortion. I doubt you'd help raise that child in any case, probably dodge child support like a scumbag.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,063
Fuck off Bert, you piece of shit.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,073
@1,143,687 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Minor quibbles:
> Blocked funding for any organisation that performs abortion.
Wrong. Planned Parenthood is getting more funding than ever: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/6/planned-parenthood-reports-increase-in-government-/
Federal funding for abortion except in the case of rape, incest, or saving the life of the mother has been illegal since 1976: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment
> Made it legal for companies to refuse to cover birth control or abortion in their health insurance.
The first half is wrong. That was a pre-Trump Supreme Court decision in 2014: https://reproductiverights.org/press-room/us-supreme-court-lets-private-companies-deny-birth-control-coverage-to-employees
> Banned trans people from the military.
True.
> Banned trans kids from using their chosen bathroom.
Wrong. He reversed a 2016 decision by the Obama administration (that had been in effect for less than one year) that forced schools to let trans kids use their chosen bathroom at the risk of losing Federal funding if they didn't. He did not ban it, it is just now no longer legally required for a school to get Federal funding: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/happens-trump-pulls-transgender-bathroom-guidance
> Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures"
I couldn't find any information on whether this is true or not.
> Made minors get permission from their parents to get abortions.
Wrong. This is on state-by-state basis, not Federal: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/teens/stds-birth-control-pregnancy/parental-consent-and-notification-laws
> K im sick of reading this bullshit
Minor quibbles:
> Blocked funding for any organisation that performs abortion.
Wrong. Planned Parenthood is getting more funding than ever: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/6/planned-parenthood-reports-increase-in-government-/
Federal funding for abortion except in the case of rape, incest, or saving the life of the mother has been illegal since 1976: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment
> Made it legal for companies to refuse to cover birth control or abortion in their health insurance.
The first half is wrong. That was a pre-Trump Supreme Court decision in 2014: https://reproductiverights.org/press-room/us-supreme-court-lets-private-companies-deny-birth-control-coverage-to-employees
> Banned trans people from the military.
True.
> Banned trans kids from using their chosen bathroom.
Wrong. He reversed a 2016 decision by the Obama administration (that had been in effect for less than one year) that forced schools to let trans kids use their chosen bathroom at the risk of losing Federal funding if they didn't. He did not ban it, it is just now no longer legally required for a school to get Federal funding: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/happens-trump-pulls-transgender-bathroom-guidance
> Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures"
I couldn't find any information on whether this is true or not.
> Made minors get permission from their parents to get abortions.
Wrong. This is on state-by-state basis, not Federal: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/teens/stds-birth-control-pregnancy/parental-consent-and-notification-laws
> K im sick of reading this bullshit
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,076
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,080
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Basically 2.5/6 of Triptych's points were correct (giving her the benefit of the doubt and counting the one I couldn't find any information on as correct).
Basically 2.5/6 of Triptych's points were correct (giving her the benefit of the doubt and counting the one I couldn't find any information on as correct).
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,082
@1,144,073 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The first one refers to the reenactment of the Mexico City Polcy I think, which will be rescinded pretty much on Day 1 of a hypothetical Biden administration.
The first one refers to the reenactment of the Mexico City Polcy I think, which will be rescinded pretty much on Day 1 of a hypothetical Biden administration.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,103
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Possibly. But given that 100% of Democratic presidents have immediately rescinded it and 100% of Republican presidents have immediately un-rescinded it, it doesn't seem like it should be a criticism of Trump specifically but is just a criticism of Republican presidents in general (since this is something that a hypothetical president Romney or Rubio would have done as well).
Do you have any insight on the fifth one? (Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures")
I couldn't find anything about that.
Possibly. But given that 100% of Democratic presidents have immediately rescinded it and 100% of Republican presidents have immediately un-rescinded it, it doesn't seem like it should be a criticism of Trump specifically but is just a criticism of Republican presidents in general (since this is something that a hypothetical president Romney or Rubio would have done as well).
Do you have any insight on the fifth one? (Disallowed federal/state/local governments from refusing to fund health care organisations which reject abortion, stérilisation, or other "morally questionable procedures")
I couldn't find anything about that.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,144,110
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Oh ywah that's not unique to Trump it's just something he is responsible for doing this time. It's just a political football at this point.
I don't know what that is referring to! I cant find anything either (not that I'm looking hard).
Oh ywah that's not unique to Trump it's just something he is responsible for doing this time. It's just a political football at this point.
I don't know what that is referring to! I cant find anything either (not that I'm looking hard).