Topic: Oi maye. Ave you got a loience for that opinion?
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw started this discussion 5 years ago #100,907
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,138,961
Everyone loves violent mobs of leftists randomly killing regular people because they have hearts of gold and are protesting peacefully. All other opinions are racism.
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,972
Is this a real tweet
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,973
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,974
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,976
@OP
Looks like we've got a troll here!
Looks like we've got a troll here!
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,977
Looks like someone had am incorrect opinion.Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 54 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,980
@previous (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
Just don't use social media. Minichan dot org is the only website I post on anymore, these days.
Just don't use social media. Minichan dot org is the only website I post on anymore, these days.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,138,985
@1,138,977 (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
You cry about freedom of speech, but you're willing to throw it out when some kid in a red hat gets his feelings hurt.
You cry about freedom of speech, but you're willing to throw it out when some kid in a red hat gets his feelings hurt.
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,016
@1,138,972 (dw)
(1)Any person who sends to another person—
(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—
(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
(ii)a threat; or
(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
(b)any [F2article or electronic communication] which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature,is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated.
(2)A person is not guilty of an offence by virtue of subsection (1)(a)(ii) above if he shows—
(a)that the threat was used to reinforce a demand [F3made by him on reasonable grounds]; and
(b)that he believed [F4, and had reasonable grounds for believing,] that the use of the threat was a proper means of reinforcing the demand.
(1)Any person who sends to another person—
(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—
(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
(ii)a threat; or
(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
(b)any [F2article or electronic communication] which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature,is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated.
(2)A person is not guilty of an offence by virtue of subsection (1)(a)(ii) above if he shows—
(a)that the threat was used to reinforce a demand [F3made by him on reasonable grounds]; and
(b)that he believed [F4, and had reasonable grounds for believing,] that the use of the threat was a proper means of reinforcing the demand.
Nigel from Stratford-upon-Avon joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,018
Oi la’ give ‘me ‘ell innit
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,074
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 16 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,081
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,083
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,085
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,091
@1,139,083 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@previous (E) this and they have to have a spotless record and years of experience first
@previous (E) this and they have to have a spotless record and years of experience first
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,094
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 20 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,100
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,106
@1,139,016 (blom)
Yeah but this image sort of implies that they are going to arrest you for being rude on the internet
Yeah but this image sort of implies that they are going to arrest you for being rude on the internet
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 56 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,107
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,109
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,110
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,178
@1,139,100 (E)
It truly does. How long is the process? I'm just going to assume it's longer than the usamerican training?
It truly does. How long is the process? I'm just going to assume it's longer than the usamerican training?
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,139,181
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
IDK! I'm not a UKBrit, I just know they have more stringent requirements for carrying guns.
IDK! I'm not a UKBrit, I just know they have more stringent requirements for carrying guns.