Topic: Notice how the gun debate suddenly vanished?
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #100,786
It’s like there was a silent conscience between both liberals and conservatives on the importance of the second amendment.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,137,259
it's hard to have a school shooting over zoom
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,260
1. Did you mean "consensus"?
2. Isn't a "silent conscience" redundant?
2. Isn't a "silent conscience" redundant?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,261
I thought you were leaving forever, Bert.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,265
COVID and BLM consumed everyone's limited attention span.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,278
Molan McLabeAnonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,359
All the people who wanted to take the guns because police have them now want to defund the police.
Normal people will vote for Trump though, so it looks like Trump wins again!
Normal people will vote for Trump though, so it looks like Trump wins again!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 33 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,366
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,370
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 52 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,374
@1,137,366 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I believe the general idea is that you invest in the community and make sure someone’s environment is able to allow them to prosper so they never have to result to crime leaving the police there only to catch serial killers and rapists.
I believe the general idea is that you invest in the community and make sure someone’s environment is able to allow them to prosper so they never have to result to crime leaving the police there only to catch serial killers and rapists.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,375
@1,137,366 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I mean...i called the cops when someone was trying to break into my house. They gave me a restraining order. One year later, he's moved back into my building which contravenes the order. The cops say they can't do anything about it (lolwut?). The cops pull me over because i have a man in my backseat and a restraining order against a man so I have to waste half an hour proving that I'm not driving around the guy i have a restraining order against. The cops say I can't do anything to stop that from happening, either. So the cops decide he can do whatever he wants and i can get pulled over and made late for work or miss an appointment at their whims?
If someone breaks into my house I'm not bothering to call the cops again.
I mean...i called the cops when someone was trying to break into my house. They gave me a restraining order. One year later, he's moved back into my building which contravenes the order. The cops say they can't do anything about it (lolwut?). The cops pull me over because i have a man in my backseat and a restraining order against a man so I have to waste half an hour proving that I'm not driving around the guy i have a restraining order against. The cops say I can't do anything to stop that from happening, either. So the cops decide he can do whatever he wants and i can get pulled over and made late for work or miss an appointment at their whims?
If someone breaks into my house I'm not bothering to call the cops again.
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 51 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,384
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,392
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
> In societies without guns, you use bats and knives.
Most women cant successfully fight off a man with hand combat
> In societies without guns, you use bats and knives.
Most women cant successfully fight off a man with hand combat
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,393
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,397
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 22 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,401
@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
My family is so against me having my own, that I feel as though I can't. They have them, but when they go on trips, I am alone and worried
My family is so against me having my own, that I feel as though I can't. They have them, but when they go on trips, I am alone and worried
Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,402
Anonymous D replied with this 5 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,403
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,420
@1,137,402 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
They are afraid that I'll use it to kill myself.
The concept of me killing myself is a valid concern, but I would never use a gun. I would attempt to use a "gentler" method, as tp be less traumatizing to me family.
Also, I have a 95% likelihood of waiting until my mother dies before doing so
They are afraid that I'll use it to kill myself.
The concept of me killing myself is a valid concern, but I would never use a gun. I would attempt to use a "gentler" method, as tp be less traumatizing to me family.
Also, I have a 95% likelihood of waiting until my mother dies before doing so
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,423
Anonymous D replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,426
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,432
@1,137,393 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes. But they harass me while leaving the violent fucker totally alone. They refuse to enforce the restraining order. I've only had negative effects.
Yes. But they harass me while leaving the violent fucker totally alone. They refuse to enforce the restraining order. I've only had negative effects.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,438
@1,137,423 (K)
@1,137,426 (D)
Who knows what will happen? It's soothing to me to know that I can be in charge of my own death. Know what I mean?
@1,137,426 (D)
Who knows what will happen? It's soothing to me to know that I can be in charge of my own death. Know what I mean?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,439
@1,137,432 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Not being crude, but they possibly prevented your rape and murder
Could you possibly fight off someone on your own?
Not being crude, but they possibly prevented your rape and murder
Could you possibly fight off someone on your own?
Anonymous D replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,441
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,497
@1,137,439 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If that were the case, why would they decide it was appropriate tl allow the person who could have raped and murdered me to move back into my building, against the restraining order?
If that were the case, why would they decide it was appropriate tl allow the person who could have raped and murdered me to move back into my building, against the restraining order?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,537
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I don't know, maybe they are working around the terms of the restraining order? Perhaps you should go higher than them for this matter? Regarding the break in, they did stop it and likely prevented a rape
I don't know, maybe they are working around the terms of the restraining order? Perhaps you should go higher than them for this matter? Regarding the break in, they did stop it and likely prevented a rape
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,601
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,616
@1,137,537 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Nope. The restraining order says he cannot be within 50 meters of me and not within 500 meters of my residence or place of employment. I showed them the papers and pointed out those lines. They said "welp we can't do anything".
That in itself i could deal with, even though it is absurd and obviously wrong. It is that in conjuction with them saying I cant do anything to stop them from pulling me over and making me waste half an hour at their whim. So he's safe enough to live in my building but they're worried I'll have him in my car? He gets to do whatever he wants and not get bothered by them while I can't do anything to stop the cops from harassing me? That's fucked up.
Nope. The restraining order says he cannot be within 50 meters of me and not within 500 meters of my residence or place of employment. I showed them the papers and pointed out those lines. They said "welp we can't do anything".
That in itself i could deal with, even though it is absurd and obviously wrong. It is that in conjuction with them saying I cant do anything to stop them from pulling me over and making me waste half an hour at their whim. So he's safe enough to live in my building but they're worried I'll have him in my car? He gets to do whatever he wants and not get bothered by them while I can't do anything to stop the cops from harassing me? That's fucked up.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,619
@1,137,537 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
By the time they got there other people had gotten rid of him.
And rape wasn't going to happen lol
By the time they got there other people had gotten rid of him.
And rape wasn't going to happen lol
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL triple-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,620
@1,137,601 (G)
Huh, if theyre so concerned for my safety, why are they fine with him living in my building even though he's not allowed near my person or residence and his presence there breaks the conditions of the restraining order?
Huh, if theyre so concerned for my safety, why are they fine with him living in my building even though he's not allowed near my person or residence and his presence there breaks the conditions of the restraining order?
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,621
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,622
@1,137,616 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You really need to try some other channels. Possibly contact the news and such
You really need to try some other channels. Possibly contact the news and such
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,652
@1,137,621 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I know the guy well. It turns out he's a massive pussy. For a decent while he was even running away from me and I'm not scary. And several very muscly men were in the place with me. And his threats were of killing me and everyone in the room, not rape.
I know the guy well. It turns out he's a massive pussy. For a decent while he was even running away from me and I'm not scary. And several very muscly men were in the place with me. And his threats were of killing me and everyone in the room, not rape.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,664
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,676
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Why was your first assumption rape? My first assumption for a motive to break into someone's home would be burglary or robbery.
Why was your first assumption rape? My first assumption for a motive to break into someone's home would be burglary or robbery.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,680
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
But what you described was a home invasion, which is very different from a standard burglary
But what you described was a home invasion, which is very different from a standard burglary
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 48 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,690
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I would still assume a robbery motive. Why is your assumption rape? I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious about your thought process.
I would still assume a robbery motive. Why is your assumption rape? I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious about your thought process.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,701
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Because when people want to rob someone, they do it when the occupants aren't there. That is why a home invasion charge is much more serious than a burglary charge. Also, why would your stalker just want to rob you? Aren't there richer people to rob, if that is the intention?
Because when people want to rob someone, they do it when the occupants aren't there. That is why a home invasion charge is much more serious than a burglary charge. Also, why would your stalker just want to rob you? Aren't there richer people to rob, if that is the intention?
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,715
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Violent home invasions followed by robbery isn't unheard of at all.
And some people here think I'm well-off, apparently.
Violent home invasions followed by robbery isn't unheard of at all.
And some people here think I'm well-off, apparently.
(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,719
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,723
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No. And I don't think stalker is an appropriate or accurate descriptor.
No. And I don't think stalker is an appropriate or accurate descriptor.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,724
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You got a restraining order against him because he kept trying to steal your money?
You got a restraining order against him because he kept trying to steal your money?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,832
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,137,865
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
But it's always much easier to rob an empty home. So someone doing a home invasion is willing and prepared to commit violence against the occupants, and so violence should be expected. Also rape is a common occurrence
But it's always much easier to rob an empty home. So someone doing a home invasion is willing and prepared to commit violence against the occupants, and so violence should be expected. Also rape is a common occurrence