Topic: Trump literally DOES NOT READ BOOKS lol
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #100,602
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #1,134,978
Wow this is a terribly written "article"
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,979
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,987
@previous (A)
I believe that. But that clickbait shit is a sorry excuse for "journalism".
I believe that. But that clickbait shit is a sorry excuse for "journalism".
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,992
I used to read books when I was a kid
I started a new one a few years ago but I forgot how it started and I might have to start all over again
I started a new one a few years ago but I forgot how it started and I might have to start all over again
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 19 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,999
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,003
@1,134,987 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yeah but it totally dunks on Trump. That makes it okay to practice sloppy journalism.
Yeah but it totally dunks on Trump. That makes it okay to practice sloppy journalism.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,007
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
It disturbs me when people use shitty writing to "dunk on" shitty speech.
It disturbs me when people use shitty writing to "dunk on" shitty speech.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,008
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,010
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,012
@1,134,999 (A)
I guess. I just don't care about fictional stories so much anymore except in some dramatically acted form, and even then only some of that.
I guess. I just don't care about fictional stories so much anymore except in some dramatically acted form, and even then only some of that.
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,014
I have to take a dunk, hhHHUUHHHHHHPHHHARRRPPP! *plop*
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,019
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,020
@previous (E)
I'm not surprised. And that's fine. But me using words you don't know doesn't mean my comments are shitty writing.
I'm not surprised. And that's fine. But me using words you don't know doesn't mean my comments are shitty writing.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,046
Portmanteau. Portmanteau.*opens envelope*
What part of Natalie is voted most wanted to suck.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,102
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,105
Haven't read a book in my life and God willing never will.