Topic: The sheeple are out in force
blom started this discussion 5 years ago #100,600
Seriously you'd think after four months without, that people would become less reliant on perpetuating the anti-working class retail industry.No berting in this thread please.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 46 minutes later[^] [v] #1,134,906
Not a single receipt in sight!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,918
Are you objecting to them buying things, or buying frivolous things, or buying things from that retailer, or buying things while being black, or buying things based on a perceived judgement of low income? I don't understand
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,919
blom (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,921
@1,134,918 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The second one
Supporting chain businesses in general really
Wastefulness and a return to throwaway culture
Because of predatory corporations who spread their propaganda that targets the working class
Their race is not relevant please don't bert in my thread thanks kook
The second one
Supporting chain businesses in general really
Wastefulness and a return to throwaway culture
Because of predatory corporations who spread their propaganda that targets the working class
Their race is not relevant please don't bert in my thread thanks kook
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,923
@1,134,906 (B)
Why would someone take a picture of their receipt if not for insurance or budget purposes? What kind of nerd takes a picture of their receipt to show people?
Why would someone take a picture of their receipt if not for insurance or budget purposes? What kind of nerd takes a picture of their receipt to show people?
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,924
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,932
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,933
They did their holiday shopping during the looting.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,948
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,951
@1,134,918 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Are you objecting to them buying things, or buying frivolous things, or buying things from that retailer, or buying things while being black, or buying things based on a perceived judgement of low income? I don't understand
good question
> Are you objecting to them buying things, or buying frivolous things, or buying things from that retailer, or buying things while being black, or buying things based on a perceived judgement of low income? I don't understand
good question
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,954
@1,134,921 (blom)
To me, this response shows your privilege
1. Referencing race isn't racist and you implying such shows the idea that you "don't skin see color"
2. In many places (especially urban communities) They only have chain stores. Do you want them to drive 50 miles to buy a $20 handbag?
3. Many people with low income lives have way less options regarding manifesting happiness. Retail therapy is valid and not automatically negative
3. Sexism. Men heavily judge women on their shopping habits, when they themselves consume equally in different ways. I wonder, do you watch porn? Most males do, and I see that as being way more harmful
4. It's fucking Tj Maxx. They probably spent $70 bucks and it helps the economy
To me, this response shows your privilege
1. Referencing race isn't racist and you implying such shows the idea that you "don't skin see color"
2. In many places (especially urban communities) They only have chain stores. Do you want them to drive 50 miles to buy a $20 handbag?
3. Many people with low income lives have way less options regarding manifesting happiness. Retail therapy is valid and not automatically negative
3. Sexism. Men heavily judge women on their shopping habits, when they themselves consume equally in different ways. I wonder, do you watch porn? Most males do, and I see that as being way more harmful
4. It's fucking Tj Maxx. They probably spent $70 bucks and it helps the economy
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,956
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,957
Also, calling them sheeple when you are an easily led person is fucked up
Anonymous B replied with this 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,980
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,982
@1,134,933 (G)
Ugh fuck off,
@1,134,921 (blom)
@1,134,954 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Kook makes good points here.
Ugh fuck off,
@1,134,921 (blom)
@1,134,954 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Kook makes good points here.
jodie !foster2PAQ replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,031
blom (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 7 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,073
@1,134,954 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
1. Derailing a thread into an argument about black people is berting because their being black isn't relevant to the topic of this thread. The microcosm of this thread doesn't represent my wider views of black people.
2. I don't want them to buy disposable fashion at all. I want people to be less resource-wasteful and frivolous.
3. I won't be lectured on living with a low income. Retail therapy is a sham that is promoted by capitalists to suck up the wealth. Material goods cannot bring you happiness. Retail Therapy takes advantage of human paychology to trick people into feeling like it makes them happy, so they keep coming back for more and more and more.
3(2). It's not just women that buy into the false idea that giving away what little they have to corporations will bring them happiness. I never implied that it was. Capitalist propaganda ignores sex.
4. They spent £550, although it's not really relevant to the topic either. Fuck the economy, it is a method of waging class war that has the side-effect of ruining the environment. Thanks!
1. Derailing a thread into an argument about black people is berting because their being black isn't relevant to the topic of this thread. The microcosm of this thread doesn't represent my wider views of black people.
2. I don't want them to buy disposable fashion at all. I want people to be less resource-wasteful and frivolous.
3. I won't be lectured on living with a low income. Retail therapy is a sham that is promoted by capitalists to suck up the wealth. Material goods cannot bring you happiness. Retail Therapy takes advantage of human paychology to trick people into feeling like it makes them happy, so they keep coming back for more and more and more.
3(2). It's not just women that buy into the false idea that giving away what little they have to corporations will bring them happiness. I never implied that it was. Capitalist propaganda ignores sex.
4. They spent £550, although it's not really relevant to the topic either. Fuck the economy, it is a method of waging class war that has the side-effect of ruining the environment. Thanks!
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,100
@previous (blom)
Fuck the economy? You fucking commie asshole
And if race wasn't a priority in posting this, why did you pick black people and a woman? There were no pics of white guys holding up their Switches?
Retail therapy is real and valid and no less frivolous than so many forms of hobbies or entertainment
You didn't respond to the porn issue. You know what seems wholesome? two happy pocs being pleased as punch at their handbag purchases. You know what is filthy as fuck? Watching some mascara smeared woman getting facefucked for hours of the night. This thread makes you seem worse than Bert, because he doesn't pretend to be "woke"
Fuck the economy? You fucking commie asshole
And if race wasn't a priority in posting this, why did you pick black people and a woman? There were no pics of white guys holding up their Switches?
Retail therapy is real and valid and no less frivolous than so many forms of hobbies or entertainment
You didn't respond to the porn issue. You know what seems wholesome? two happy pocs being pleased as punch at their handbag purchases. You know what is filthy as fuck? Watching some mascara smeared woman getting facefucked for hours of the night. This thread makes you seem worse than Bert, because he doesn't pretend to be "woke"
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
blom (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 58 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,106
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm communist and proud. I hope they hang Mr T. K. Maxx from a telegraph pole. Why are you so angry that I'm including black people in my topics? I think you're the real racist here.
There are many more valid hobbies than indulging the Man. For example, gardening and promoting the revolution.
Maybe I enjoy watching mascara smeared women getting facefucked for hours, but that is what Mr Fatcat is doing to the poor of the nation every minute of every day.
Why don't you just understand?
I'm communist and proud. I hope they hang Mr T. K. Maxx from a telegraph pole. Why are you so angry that I'm including black people in my topics? I think you're the real racist here.
There are many more valid hobbies than indulging the Man. For example, gardening and promoting the revolution.
Maybe I enjoy watching mascara smeared women getting facefucked for hours, but that is what Mr Fatcat is doing to the poor of the nation every minute of every day.
Why don't you just understand?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,107
Wait in the UK TJ Maxx is TK Maxx???? Wtf.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,206
@1,135,106 (blom)
I just pray that the next time you improve your mood by watching a sex trafficking victim vomiting on a cock, you would reconsider and purchase a hand bag
The fact that black people being happy as a family isn't wholesome to you, is incredibly disturbing
Once again, worse than Bert
I just pray that the next time you improve your mood by watching a sex trafficking victim vomiting on a cock, you would reconsider and purchase a hand bag
The fact that black people being happy as a family isn't wholesome to you, is incredibly disturbing
Once again, worse than Bert
blom (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,211
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 years later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,269
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,289
Wow kook was really mad in this here thread huh
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 12 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,352
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,365
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,366
Maybe she just really loves brands idk
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,367
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,369
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 13 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,464
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,472
I recall being resentful for some reason
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,483
@1,178,464 (𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞)
Those people are likely also poor. They're shopping at Tk Maxx
Those people are likely also poor. They're shopping at Tk Maxx
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,484
While that is a silly amount of purses to purchase, it's nothing quite like what I've seen with the upper class.
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,491
@1,178,483 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I seem to recall my issue was the statement that they bought a lot of handbags at TK Maxx because his wife enjoys buying handbags at TK Maxx, because it implies that his wife's hobby is shopping at TK Maxx.
I seem to recall my issue was the statement that they bought a lot of handbags at TK Maxx because his wife enjoys buying handbags at TK Maxx, because it implies that his wife's hobby is shopping at TK Maxx.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,492
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,493
@1,178,484 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
Also it's not even new stuff. Its cast offs that other stores couldn't sell
Also it's not even new stuff. Its cast offs that other stores couldn't sell
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,496
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,503
@previous (𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞)
It's not wasteful as they are purchasing products that would end up in a landfill. It's the opposite of wasteful
It's not wasteful as they are purchasing products that would end up in a landfill. It's the opposite of wasteful
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,504
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's not wasteful as they are purchasing products that would end up in a landfill. It's the opposite of wasteful
that's.... a new take on fast fashion for me tbh
> It's not wasteful as they are purchasing products that would end up in a landfill. It's the opposite of wasteful
that's.... a new take on fast fashion for me tbh
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,505
Anonymous O replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,506
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
buying waste doesn't reduce waste. you don't protect the environment by hoarding things and saying they're not in a landfill
buying waste doesn't reduce waste. you don't protect the environment by hoarding things and saying they're not in a landfill
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,508
@previous (O)
Reusing things can reduce waste. Especially if she would have purchased those bags new. Also she may be giving them as gifts to people who will also use them
Reusing things can reduce waste. Especially if she would have purchased those bags new. Also she may be giving them as gifts to people who will also use them
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,510
@1,178,506 (O)
No but if you utilize something that would have been waste, you are reducing the literal amount that is going into the landfill.
No but if you utilize something that would have been waste, you are reducing the literal amount that is going into the landfill.
Anonymous O replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,511
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
why would bags on the sales floor at tj max be slated for landfill?
@1,178,508 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
especially new? not used? pretty sure if you want to actually prevent something from going to landfill you'll but it used and... actually prevent it from becoming waste while not supporting manufacturers of waste
why would bags on the sales floor at tj max be slated for landfill?
@1,178,508 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
especially new? not used? pretty sure if you want to actually prevent something from going to landfill you'll but it used and... actually prevent it from becoming waste while not supporting manufacturers of waste
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,512
@previous (O)
But they're buying cast offs and items with flaws that would be thrown away. Tj Maxx and Marshall's acquires things that would otherwise be binned
But they're buying cast offs and items with flaws that would be thrown away. Tj Maxx and Marshall's acquires things that would otherwise be binned
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,513
@1,178,511 (O)
Because items at Tj Max and Marshall's are cast-offs that regular stores either couldn't sell or are flawed in some way
Because items at Tj Max and Marshall's are cast-offs that regular stores either couldn't sell or are flawed in some way
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,516
@1,178,511 (O)
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because items at Tj Max and Marshall's are cast-offs that regular stores either couldn't sell or are flawed in some way
@1,178,512 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> But they're buying cast offs and items with flaws that would be thrown away. Tj Maxx and Marshall's acquires things that would otherwise be binned
Same with Ross dress for less. Apparently the clothing industry is strict that brands often will mark something as a reject if it even has an extra stitch. It's not to the quality they want their brand to represent. If there wasn't a store that would re sell it, it would most likely be thrown away or a slim possibility exists that they would donate them also.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because items at Tj Max and Marshall's are cast-offs that regular stores either couldn't sell or are flawed in some way
@1,178,512 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> But they're buying cast offs and items with flaws that would be thrown away. Tj Maxx and Marshall's acquires things that would otherwise be binned
Same with Ross dress for less. Apparently the clothing industry is strict that brands often will mark something as a reject if it even has an extra stitch. It's not to the quality they want their brand to represent. If there wasn't a store that would re sell it, it would most likely be thrown away or a slim possibility exists that they would donate them also.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,519
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
They almost never donate things because it ruins the brand image or something
They almost never donate things because it ruins the brand image or something
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,520
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Like someone will get the "messed up" ones and whine about it online or whatever. It's pretty fucking dumb.
Remember when they found like a bunch of people with shirts that were wrong winners of sports events and stuff and the reason was that the clothing companies printed both outcomes and like ditched the losing team's merch in like Africa or something?
Like someone will get the "messed up" ones and whine about it online or whatever. It's pretty fucking dumb.
Remember when they found like a bunch of people with shirts that were wrong winners of sports events and stuff and the reason was that the clothing companies printed both outcomes and like ditched the losing team's merch in like Africa or something?
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,521
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,522
@previous (𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞)
Is purchasing things from Goodwill encouraging things to be made? What about garage sales?
What about making your own bags? Is that encouraging textile factories to stay open?
Is purchasing things from Goodwill encouraging things to be made? What about garage sales?
What about making your own bags? Is that encouraging textile factories to stay open?
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,523
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
TK Maxx is a for-profit business that purchases clothes from suppliers.
You don't agree that purchasing a commodity encourages the ongoing creation and sale of a commodity?
TK Maxx is a for-profit business that purchases clothes from suppliers.
You don't agree that purchasing a commodity encourages the ongoing creation and sale of a commodity?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,524
@previous (𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞)
They purchase cast off clothes with flaws that would otherwise be thrown away.
If they stopped doing that, the original companies would still make clothes. Tj Max isn't keeping those companies afloat
They purchase cast off clothes with flaws that would otherwise be thrown away.
If they stopped doing that, the original companies would still make clothes. Tj Max isn't keeping those companies afloat
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,609
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Would the companies not instead donate the clothes to charity, or tighten up their quality control so that there are less rejected samples? TK Maxx sells more than just flawed clothes also, they buy anything they can get a good price on.
Would the companies not instead donate the clothes to charity, or tighten up their quality control so that there are less rejected samples? TK Maxx sells more than just flawed clothes also, they buy anything they can get a good price on.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,610
@previous (𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞)
They don't donate clothes to charity because it hurts the brand and they use cheap labor
They don't donate clothes to charity because it hurts the brand and they use cheap labor