Minichan

Topic: Supreme Court US says trans cannot be fired

Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #100,589

Congratulations, Meta and Bert!

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,134,817

No, the Supreme court ruled that people cannot be fired for being gay or trans. very different. A step forward, even though all it means is that companies will find some other bullshit excuse (or fire them for no reason at all). However, it does mean the companies stupid enough to say or write that the employee is fired for being gay or trans can now have action taken against them.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,831

the three fag haters on the supreme court are Thomas, Alito, and fun party dude Cavenaugh

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,838

@1,134,817 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Such is the problem with at will employment, which can only be solved with collective bargaining action.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,839

@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
Ah yes, Walter became a union man...

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,841

one way to head off violent revolution is to ensure a healthy system of checks and balances whereby there is not too much power concentrated anywhere. allowing large numbers of people of ordinary wealth or less to pool their power is a method to curb abuse of power made possible in the raw employer-employee relationship.

Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,842

@1,134,838 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
That, or a society that actually has laws in place that favor workers over rich people.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,846

It's not a victory until Trump's rollbacks for discrimination protections in insurance/medical field is denied.

tteh !MODABUSE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,855

tfw gorsuch wrote the majority opinion

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,872

@1,134,838 (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
Proud of you for kicking your alt-Reich nonsense and becoming a man of the People.

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,883

@1,134,817 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
That's an oversimplification of the law. Courts do not require direct proof like that because it is, of course, a very stupid and very rare employer that would make their discrimination that patently obvious.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,886

@previous (beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg)
Yes, of course. I didn't want to go into all of that in an off-the-cuff comment.

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,888

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Sure, I imagine you were about to launch into a nuanced discussion of the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework when, instead, you thought it would make more sense to point out that today's decision means that employers can simply give another reason to fire someone and there's nothing the employee can do. Makes sense

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,889

@previous (beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg)
yeah, you're right. I shouldn't have posted that comment, it doesn't reflect reality.

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,890

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I was going to respond to myself and point out that my comment was rude but you answered too quickly

Sorry, my comment was rude

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg double-posted this 5 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,891

I also hate myself for italicizing the case name
What a pretentious twat I am

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,892

Hi my name is Becky I have a fancy law degree and I think that makes me not a big dork.

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg replied with this 5 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,893

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
:(

Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,896

@1,134,892 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Alexis: how do I sticky a post?

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,900

@1,134,892 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I bet she dreams of herself in place of the role of Tom Cruise cracking Jack Nicholson on the witness stand in- 'A few good men.'

Anonymous L double-posted this 5 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,911

Externally hosted imageBecky dream

COLONEL JESSEP...DID YOU ORDER THE CODE RED??!!!

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,915

@1,134,890 (beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg)
All's good

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,917

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)

Next time she says something slightly wrong about programming or systems administration I'll fucking DESTROY her. ??

beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,920

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I don't really discuss these topics though

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,134,922

@previous (beckeyderp !3NeoVaGFAg)
Could you maybe begin? They're like the two things I have.

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,040

@1,134,842 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Which cannot happen when the ruling class owns the majority of the lawmakers. Nobody owes you a living and you must squeeze and carve your life from the hideous monster of corporate.
@1,134,872 (I)
Alt right is cringe. Bunch of middle class brats with trust fund undercuts blowing cowardly dogwhistles. They took everything crusty and scummy and punk out of the far right and made it bland and bourgeois.

dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 54 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,048

@1,134,842 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Doesn't exist

Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 5 years ago, 33 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,053

@previous (dw)
Norway. Thanks.

dw replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,054

@previous (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
then why do the workers pay much more tax than corporations there

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 38 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,061

@1,135,053 (Apocalypse Indy™ !bYobIzYIFE)
Trump lowered the US corporate tax rate to 21%, which is just one percent lower than Norway's corporate tax rate.

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,080

@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
Their income tax is over 40%!

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,090

@previous (L)
Yet the corporate tax is nearly half that.

dw replied with this 5 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,377

@1,135,080 (L)
they dont have a flat income tax you mora

Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,390

Americans have traded away their liberty for safety. Americans will soon eat each other in the streets for their false freedom.

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,391

Externally hosted image@1,135,377 (dw)

Anonymous L double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,392

@1,135,377 (dw)


DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER IN EGYPT!

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

dw replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,395

Externally hosted image@previous (L)

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,396

Externally hosted image

Anonymous L double-posted this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,397

https://tradingeconomics.com/norway/forecast

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,409

@1,135,395 (dw)
At the top is the flat base rate everybody pays - 22%. Below are the progressive™ step taxes: 1.9% to 16.2%.
@1,135,391 (L)
@previous (L)
That's the highest you might pay... the flat base rate and highest step tax: 38.2% (22 + 16.2). It's 37% in the US using your same website: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/forecast

dw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,411

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)

yes thanks for explaining the table i posted

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,431

@previous (dw)
Was more for bert's benefit, but you are very welcome. ?

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,443

whoa, whoa, what the fuck, has somebody here been lying about Norwegians paying a high income tax rate without even explaining what marginal rates are, and trying to mislead us into thinking that Norwegians pay a much higher amount than they actually do?

dw replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,444

@1,135,431 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
?

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,450

What about how males who want to say they are transing over to female and then being involved with sports

A trans freak can sell cars or type in an office or manage carwash empoyees and the bookkeeper also...but m2f trans in sports is bullshit.

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,472

@previous (L)
Your usage of the phrase "trans freak" really showcases how accepting and non-discriminatory you are.

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,475

@1,135,450 (L)
Why does it matter to you so much? You're clearly not competing.

Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,487

@1,135,450 (L)
I have a feeling that a cis female athlete will be able to kick your ass.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,547

Its not about me, you simpering tart. How about commementing on the Real issue. You pretentious skank.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,550

@previous (L)
The issue is just so insignificant. It can be addressed separately. You dumb bitch.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,560

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
@1,135,547 (L)
it is very offtopic at least! But there's a very simple solution in simply banning sports record keeping, which has always been about selling trading cards to children and record books to adult-children anyway.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,561

@previous (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
What?!

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,562

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm kidding, I hope you know. It's off-topic in this thread.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,563

@previous (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
Omg I was flabbergasted lmao

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,564

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
lol

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 52 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,565

@1,135,562 (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
I actually think that we should have an all steroid hyper league of every sport

Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,566

Adults who are way into sports are child-like for sure. Obsessing over people you don't even know throwing balls around. How pitiful is that?

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,567

@1,135,565 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
that would be interesting, would all the sports be play simultaneously on the same field?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,570

@1,135,566 (F)
Ugh. I don't even like sports and I disagree. So many people ate obsessed with a variety of media, or porn. That is a huge chunk of the population that you call pitiful

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,571

@1,135,567 (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
I think that we could make things like moving bases in baseball, pitfalls, and intentional distractions

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,572

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

IRL running man? That'd be cool.

Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,573

@1,135,570 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
And I stand by it. Imagine devoting your life to people you don't even know playing a game.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,575

@1,135,572 (Q)
I know right?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 31 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,576

@1,135,573 (F)
But you must be interested in some form of media. How do sports differ?

Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,577

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
First, sports are just games. Second, normal people do not devote their life to such things. Watching a good chess game might be enjoyable, but I am not devoting my life to it.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,583

@previous (F)
Normal people do though. So many many people
Also, how are "just games", less valid than other popular shows, movies, music, and porn? I don't understand

(Edited 39 seconds later.)

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,584

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Even pork! People buy blankets and sweaters with bacon prints!

Oh, porn.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,586

@previous (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
Lmao
What in the fuck is a bacon print?

(Edited 45 seconds later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,588

Externally hosted image@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

Something like this, I imagine.

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,591

Externally hosted image@1,135,586 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (Q)

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,593

Externally hosted image@1,135,586 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,135,588 (Q)

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ triple-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,595

Externally hosted image@1,135,586 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,135,591 (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,596

@previous (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
Oh man that is disgusting and fantastic. So is the model's facial hair. I don't understand what's going on with that weird patch between the two pockets.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,601

@1,135,588 (Q)
@1,135,593 (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
@1,135,595 (Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+)
Weirdos! Oldmansimpsonshakingfistatsky.jpeg

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,605

@1,135,571 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> I think that we could make things like moving bases in baseball, pitfalls, and intentional distractions

and when a base starts to creep away, they play BASE! HOW LOW CAN YOU GO by Public Enemy

Coil E. Leafeon !!KKlJgsBn+ replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,135,608

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Im getting out my credit card, where can I subscribe??
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.