Topic: This man literally owns Black Lives Matter
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #100,486
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,133,189
I don't know who that is.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,191
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,192
@previous (C)
Apparently it is George Soros. All i know about him is that he is rich and some bs about him paying leftists?
Apparently it is George Soros. All i know about him is that he is rich and some bs about him paying leftists?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,193
@1,133,189 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> I don't know who that is.
Any time paranoid right wingers post a picture of a guy who they claim "literally owns [insert social movement that they patently do not own]", it's George Soros.
> I don't know who that is.
Any time paranoid right wingers post a picture of a guy who they claim "literally owns [insert social movement that they patently do not own]", it's George Soros.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 56 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,194
@1,133,192 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I don't really know anything about him! Evil white man is a good catch-all term for any white man people dislike, tho.
I don't really know anything about him! Evil white man is a good catch-all term for any white man people dislike, tho.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,195
@1,133,193 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I have seen that online. I don't know why they say that though.
I have seen that online. I don't know why they say that though.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 36 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,196
Hell yes, gimme some Soros bux.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 23 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,197
@1,133,192 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
He's the backbone of just about every right-wing conspiracy that leftism is an entirely astroturfed thing, almost entirely because he's a rich Jewish person.
According to the people who have brains smooth enough to follow this, protests against the travel ban and against rolling back reproductive rights are apparently sponsored by him, and he hires crisis actors to stage mass shootings. (But nobody actually dies, because they're crisis actors, and it's all a leftist false flag stunt to stop American Freedom™.)
He's the backbone of just about every right-wing conspiracy that leftism is an entirely astroturfed thing, almost entirely because he's a rich Jewish person.
According to the people who have brains smooth enough to follow this, protests against the travel ban and against rolling back reproductive rights are apparently sponsored by him, and he hires crisis actors to stage mass shootings. (But nobody actually dies, because they're crisis actors, and it's all a leftist false flag stunt to stop American Freedom™.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,198
@previous (F)
Remember when in the lead up to the 2018 midterms, there was a migrant caravan of about 3000 people directly funded by George Soros that was going to come to the US and replace all 200 million white people? And remember how incredibly hyped it was all throughout the conservative media sphere? And then remember how after the elections when Dems utterly crushed R's in the House and mostly held the line in the Senate, we never ever heard about it again, even though for weeks it was the most talked about story in America? Every George Soros conspiracy is exactly as sincere and plausible as that one.
Remember when in the lead up to the 2018 midterms, there was a migrant caravan of about 3000 people directly funded by George Soros that was going to come to the US and replace all 200 million white people? And remember how incredibly hyped it was all throughout the conservative media sphere? And then remember how after the elections when Dems utterly crushed R's in the House and mostly held the line in the Senate, we never ever heard about it again, even though for weeks it was the most talked about story in America? Every George Soros conspiracy is exactly as sincere and plausible as that one.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,200
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
God damn, somehow I completely forgot about that one. Love to live in a post-truth world.
God damn, somehow I completely forgot about that one. Love to live in a post-truth world.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 34 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,203
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 10 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,204
@1,133,197 (F)
@1,133,198 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Bizarre. Is he a political figure or politically active? I've never heard of him outside these conspiracy theories. What does he do/where does his money come from?
@1,133,198 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Bizarre. Is he a political figure or politically active? I've never heard of him outside these conspiracy theories. What does he do/where does his money come from?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 22 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,205
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,206
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,207
@1,133,203 (A)
Yes, BLM has received funding. John Cena donated a million dollars. Is there any evidence that George Soros donated the other 99 million dollars?
Yes, BLM has received funding. John Cena donated a million dollars. Is there any evidence that George Soros donated the other 99 million dollars?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 5 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,208
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,209
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,211
@previous (A)
And donating money doesn't make someone in charge of the movement. BLM isn't a corporation with shareholders it kowtows to.
And donating money doesn't make someone in charge of the movement. BLM isn't a corporation with shareholders it kowtows to.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,214
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)Maybe not "in charge" but if you donate huge sums of money when which then the movement relies on you can then direct it through it's spoke people.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,215
@1,133,204 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
He's a liberal billionaire who gives to social justice causes. He's also Jewish, so when you combine those two things, you get the sort of complete mental meltdown you'd expect from conservatives nowadays tbh.
@1,133,205 (A)
I know all about the OSF lol. I have even applied to work there and gotten rejected. :( He donates to a ton of causes, and as far as i can tell from some preliminary digging, he/OSF have donated $33 million, meaning that of that $100 million+ raised, he's like the largest minority stakeholder at best.
He's a liberal billionaire who gives to social justice causes. He's also Jewish, so when you combine those two things, you get the sort of complete mental meltdown you'd expect from conservatives nowadays tbh.
@1,133,205 (A)
I know all about the OSF lol. I have even applied to work there and gotten rejected. :( He donates to a ton of causes, and as far as i can tell from some preliminary digging, he/OSF have donated $33 million, meaning that of that $100 million+ raised, he's like the largest minority stakeholder at best.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,217
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I know all about the OSF lol. I have even applied to work there and gotten rejected
They found out you moderate a far-right BBS forum
> I know all about the OSF lol. I have even applied to work there and gotten rejected
They found out you moderate a far-right BBS forum
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,218
@previous (A)
I would have sold it as a business opportunity. They could hire me and then they would own minichan dot org. We would then turn it into the premier trans antifa safe space. Thanks.
I would have sold it as a business opportunity. They could hire me and then they would own minichan dot org. We would then turn it into the premier trans antifa safe space. Thanks.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,220
@1,133,214 (A)
Weird, the image you used shows an organization doing the complete opposite of allowing a donor to direct its actions.
Weird, the image you used shows an organization doing the complete opposite of allowing a donor to direct its actions.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,223
@1,133,214 (A)
> Maybe not "in charge" but if you donate huge sums of money when which then the movement relies on you can then direct it through it's spoke people.
You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
> Maybe not "in charge" but if you donate huge sums of money when which then the movement relies on you can then direct it through it's spoke people.
You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,226
@1,133,220 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Not really. It shows they are fucked. I bet if BLM went to Israel he would also stop their funding which tells you all you need to know about him and I bet he's learned from the mistake he made with femen.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
Yes
> I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
I don't know what you mean or why you needed to add this part.
Not really. It shows they are fucked. I bet if BLM went to Israel he would also stop their funding which tells you all you need to know about him and I bet he's learned from the mistake he made with femen.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
Yes
> I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
I don't know what you mean or why you needed to add this part.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,227
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,238
@1,133,226 (A)
> You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
> Yes
> I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
> I don't know what you mean or why you needed to add this part
my man.........
> You mean like when corporate lobbying and the military industrial complex dictate American government policy, but right-wingers have absolutely no problem with it?
> Yes
> I honestly don't get why conservatives think it's some insidious 'deep state' shenanigans when 'liberals' or left wingers use their wealth to advance their causes, but when right wingers do it it's a perfectly acceptable manifestation of capitalism.
> I don't know what you mean or why you needed to add this part
my man.........
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,243
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,277
@1,133,227 (H)
That makes just as much sense as every other Soros meme/conspiracy post I've seen. Which is to say none.
That makes just as much sense as every other Soros meme/conspiracy post I've seen. Which is to say none.
Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,335
@1,133,214 (A)
You clearly don't know what the fuck's going on. The police are for sure co-opting the movement to try and make it acceptable to liberals (ie, reforming instead of defunding the police) but George Soros isn't Emperor fucking Palpatine, funding and then subverting their own shit for some kind of wack, incomprehensibly galaxy brain political game. People donating to BLM-related funds are mostly the Bail Project, which gets arrested protestors out of jail, crowdfunds for small businesses destroyed during the protests, and individual black people who need to make rent.
That or I forgot to file my W2 and just haven't been getting my direct deposits from (((George Soros))), the CEO of ANTIFA LLC™, in which case, my mistake.
You clearly don't know what the fuck's going on. The police are for sure co-opting the movement to try and make it acceptable to liberals (ie, reforming instead of defunding the police) but George Soros isn't Emperor fucking Palpatine, funding and then subverting their own shit for some kind of wack, incomprehensibly galaxy brain political game. People donating to BLM-related funds are mostly the Bail Project, which gets arrested protestors out of jail, crowdfunds for small businesses destroyed during the protests, and individual black people who need to make rent.
That or I forgot to file my W2 and just haven't been getting my direct deposits from (((George Soros))), the CEO of ANTIFA LLC™, in which case, my mistake.
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,337
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,350
@1,133,335 (F)
I get the vibe that decentralised grassroots movements are simply incomprehensible to them, to the point that these bizarrely complicated schemes are somehow more plausible in their minds.
I get the vibe that decentralised grassroots movements are simply incomprehensible to them, to the point that these bizarrely complicated schemes are somehow more plausible in their minds.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,499
@1,133,335 (F)
Maybe if arrested protested didn't get a free top lawyer they would think twice before smashing and setting fire to cars
Maybe if arrested protested didn't get a free top lawyer they would think twice before smashing and setting fire to cars
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,500
@1,133,350 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It's hardly a gressroots movement if it's backed by a billionaire.
It's hardly a gressroots movement if it's backed by a billionaire.
Anonymous F replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,505
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 1 second later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,506
@1,133,500 (A)
She is not aware of the magnitude of power wielded by Soros.
She runs off at the mouth so much about the political shenanigans of Trump but she doesnt understand the extent of the Left's diabolical schemes. Thus, truly her participation in such discussions is quite deleterious to say the least.
She is not aware of the magnitude of power wielded by Soros.
She runs off at the mouth so much about the political shenanigans of Trump but she doesnt understand the extent of the Left's diabolical schemes. Thus, truly her participation in such discussions is quite deleterious to say the least.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,570
@previous (H)
So please elaborate. How much power is wielded by Soros? How did he get his power/money? How does he use it?
Please tell me all about the Left's diabolical schemes (and their extent).
So please elaborate. How much power is wielded by Soros? How did he get his power/money? How does he use it?
Please tell me all about the Left's diabolical schemes (and their extent).
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,571
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,594
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,602
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,607
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,631
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
https://thebl.com/business-news/millionaires-war-zuckerberg-must-be-removed-from-facebook-one-way-or-another-said-speculator-george-soros.html
https://thebl.com/business-news/millionaires-war-zuckerberg-must-be-removed-from-facebook-one-way-or-another-said-speculator-george-soros.html
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,634
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,649
@1,133,594 (H)
Interestingly, Soros has supported the transition of formerly communist countries into democracy, supported dissident groups behind the iron curtain, and has been banned by authoritarian regimes including Russia. You'd think the commie-hating right wing would love him.
Interestingly, Soros has supported the transition of formerly communist countries into democracy, supported dissident groups behind the iron curtain, and has been banned by authoritarian regimes including Russia. You'd think the commie-hating right wing would love him.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,650
@1,133,631 (H)
That's the diabolical schemes of the left? George Soros wanting Zuckerberg removed from Facebook? Facebook and Zuckerberg are controversial in themselves and I wouldn't have a problem with that tbh.
That's the diabolical schemes of the left? George Soros wanting Zuckerberg removed from Facebook? Facebook and Zuckerberg are controversial in themselves and I wouldn't have a problem with that tbh.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,695
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Dont you imagine a billionaire would have stories posted to detract from the fact he was a monster?
Dont you imagine a billionaire would have stories posted to detract from the fact he was a monster?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,704
@previous (H)
What? Are you saying that Soros made that statement to attract attention away from himself? That's your evidence that he's a monster? That's tenuous.
You still haven't told me what the left's diabolical schemes are.
What? Are you saying that Soros made that statement to attract attention away from himself? That's your evidence that he's a monster? That's tenuous.
You still haven't told me what the left's diabolical schemes are.
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,709
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Abortion, outlawing guns, open borders, hairy trans men entering the same public's bathrooms as ten year old girls, giving food stamps to illegals, letting illegals vote.
Only allowing speech they allow.
Abortion, outlawing guns, open borders, hairy trans men entering the same public's bathrooms as ten year old girls, giving food stamps to illegals, letting illegals vote.
Only allowing speech they allow.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,720
@previous (H)
Half of those seem like strawmen and the other half just seem normal. Several just won't happen.
What makes you think people are trying to give illegal immigrants the right to vote?
Half of those seem like strawmen and the other half just seem normal. Several just won't happen.
What makes you think people are trying to give illegal immigrants the right to vote?
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,734
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,738
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,739
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,747
@1,133,738 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
@previous (dw)
They (California) have not passed a law to say illegals can vote.
However, the only requirement to register to vote, in California, is a state issued Drivers license or ID.
@previous (dw)
They (California) have not passed a law to say illegals can vote.
However, the only requirement to register to vote, in California, is a state issued Drivers license or ID.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,749
@previous (H)can you get a driver's license if you aren't a citizen?
edit- you can not.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 5 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,750
@1,133,747 (H)
But when votes are counted they use DMV records and other such records to verify eligibility based on citizenship
But when votes are counted they use DMV records and other such records to verify eligibility based on citizenship
Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 5 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,751
@1,133,747 (H)
Verify that illegal votes are actually counted.
Edit- non citizens can vote in state and local elections, and why not if they are residents?
Edit 2- they can't even vote in state elections, Arkansas was the last one
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote_in_the_United_States
Verify that illegal votes are actually counted.
Edit- non citizens can vote in state and local elections, and why not if they are residents?
Edit 2- they can't even vote in state elections, Arkansas was the last one
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote_in_the_United_States
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,752
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,753
https://www.foxnews.com/media/illegal-immigrants-voting-election-integrity
on’
Fox Nation host Tomi Lahren tells ‘Fox & Friends’ about her newest episode on election integrity, as she sits down with the women leading the way in educating Americans about the flaws in our voting system.
State officials and lawmakers from California and Texas to Pennsylvania and West Virginia are raising concerns over the threat that noncitizens on the voter rolls pose to the integrity of U.S. elections.
On "Fox and Friends" on Thursday, Fox Nation's Tomi Lahren said that the issue is most pronounced in California. "We have a voter fraud and election integrity epidemic in the state of California," she said, "I want to expose it so I sat down with the great ladies of Election Integrity Project-California (EIPCa)."
The Election Integrity Project-California, founded in 2010, is a grassroots, nonpartisan, nonprofit volunteer organization that advocates for citizens to become active participants in the electoral process, according to its website.
"Do you know you can register to vote and vote in California with never having shown a picture ID?" EIPCa chief analyst Ellen Swensen told Lahren in the latest episode of Fox Nation's "No Interruption."
"The [voter] registration form says, 'Give us your driver's license number or your Social Security, if you have one.' And if you don't, you can still register," said Swensen.
"So to say that illegal immigrants are voting is a given in this state?" asked Lahren.
"Absolutely," said EIPCa president and co-founder Linda Paine, "because when you open the door to corruption and fraud, people are going to walk through it."
Paine told Fox News that, since 2012, her organization has trained tens of thousands of volunteers to observe polling places across the state and report instances of suspected abuse.
According to Paine, they have recorded around 100,000 reports and the state has responded to none of them
on’
Fox Nation host Tomi Lahren tells ‘Fox & Friends’ about her newest episode on election integrity, as she sits down with the women leading the way in educating Americans about the flaws in our voting system.
State officials and lawmakers from California and Texas to Pennsylvania and West Virginia are raising concerns over the threat that noncitizens on the voter rolls pose to the integrity of U.S. elections.
On "Fox and Friends" on Thursday, Fox Nation's Tomi Lahren said that the issue is most pronounced in California. "We have a voter fraud and election integrity epidemic in the state of California," she said, "I want to expose it so I sat down with the great ladies of Election Integrity Project-California (EIPCa)."
The Election Integrity Project-California, founded in 2010, is a grassroots, nonpartisan, nonprofit volunteer organization that advocates for citizens to become active participants in the electoral process, according to its website.
"Do you know you can register to vote and vote in California with never having shown a picture ID?" EIPCa chief analyst Ellen Swensen told Lahren in the latest episode of Fox Nation's "No Interruption."
"The [voter] registration form says, 'Give us your driver's license number or your Social Security, if you have one.' And if you don't, you can still register," said Swensen.
"So to say that illegal immigrants are voting is a given in this state?" asked Lahren.
"Absolutely," said EIPCa president and co-founder Linda Paine, "because when you open the door to corruption and fraud, people are going to walk through it."
Paine told Fox News that, since 2012, her organization has trained tens of thousands of volunteers to observe polling places across the state and report instances of suspected abuse.
According to Paine, they have recorded around 100,000 reports and the state has responded to none of them
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,754
@previous (H)
> "The [voter] registration form says, 'Give us your driver's license number or your Social Security, if you have one.' And if you don't, you can still register," said Swensen.
source
> "The [voter] registration form says, 'Give us your driver's license number or your Social Security, if you have one.' And if you don't, you can still register," said Swensen.
source
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,756
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,759
@previous (H)
do you have a source that has some kind of evidence? does she elaborate on being able to register without a drivers license? how does that work?
do you have a source that has some kind of evidence? does she elaborate on being able to register without a drivers license? how does that work?
dw double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,133,760
even this group admits they have no idea if there are actually non-citizens registered to vote
> The one million+ ineligible registrants include inactive registrants (who have not voted in years but are still registered and can vote in any election), persons who’ve likely died or relocated but remain on the active voter list, and tens of thousands of people who have two or more registrations each. EIPCa cannot quantify how many more are ineligible due to non-citizen status or other reasons
> The one million+ ineligible registrants include inactive registrants (who have not voted in years but are still registered and can vote in any election), persons who’ve likely died or relocated but remain on the active voter list, and tens of thousands of people who have two or more registrations each. EIPCa cannot quantify how many more are ineligible due to non-citizen status or other reasons