Topic: A lot of lefties are going to need to be on suicide watch now
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #100,335
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,131,592
If you say so
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 47 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,593
I'll watch your suicide...You goddamn chump..
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,594
Shut up and drink your Everclear.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,595
Bert..Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,596
ITT: permanently jobless layabout hails job numbers.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,599
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,607
13.3% unemployment is catastrophically bad. Worst since the Great Depression. This is so stupid.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,608
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
FAke anon, coming in here with his goddman liberal factoids..
This is all a distraction.
FAke anon, coming in here with his goddman liberal factoids..
This is all a distraction.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,610
Bert, you refuse to work and therefore have nothing to do with the economy.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,611
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,616
@previous (G)
The unemployment rate in January 2017 was 4.7 percent. The unemployment rate today is 13.3 percent. It isn't suddenly great news because the unemplpoyment rate is only 8.5 percentage points higher than when he was sworn in because some people thought it would be 15 percent higher. It's still the worst job market in like 85 years.
The unemployment rate in January 2017 was 4.7 percent. The unemployment rate today is 13.3 percent. It isn't suddenly great news because the unemplpoyment rate is only 8.5 percentage points higher than when he was sworn in because some people thought it would be 15 percent higher. It's still the worst job market in like 85 years.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,622
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Consider how much more emotionally rested and focused Trump could have been to manage the shitstorm if the asshats who are supposed to be pretty much on the same team but act like they're not...hadn't been nipping at his heels and harassing him day and night in their deception filled witch hunt nonstop for over three years with all their hate filled bullshit.
Consider how much more emotionally rested and focused Trump could have been to manage the shitstorm if the asshats who are supposed to be pretty much on the same team but act like they're not...hadn't been nipping at his heels and harassing him day and night in their deception filled witch hunt nonstop for over three years with all their hate filled bullshit.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,632
@previous (G)
So the reason he did a terrible job managing this crisis is because he couldn't handle the pressure of being president while people did things that inconvenienced him? Sounds like he's pretty incompetent.
So the reason he did a terrible job managing this crisis is because he couldn't handle the pressure of being president while people did things that inconvenienced him? Sounds like he's pretty incompetent.
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,633
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,634
@previous (G)
Do you think Obama was treated badly by Republicans because they would not allow more than $1 trillion in deficit spending to fight the collapse of US financial institutions, while they allow over $4 trillion of deficit spending this year alone to save Trump's presidency from a bungled pandemic response?
Do you think Obama was treated badly by Republicans because they would not allow more than $1 trillion in deficit spending to fight the collapse of US financial institutions, while they allow over $4 trillion of deficit spending this year alone to save Trump's presidency from a bungled pandemic response?
(Edited 19 minutes later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,635
@1,131,608 (C)
Until you finally stop being fucking lazy and find a job, you have no reason to complain about the unemployment rate.
Until you finally stop being fucking lazy and find a job, you have no reason to complain about the unemployment rate.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,636
@previous (J)
You piece of shit. Don't cite me. You asshole. I hope you die and your family explode.
You piece of shit. Don't cite me. You asshole. I hope you die and your family explode.
(Edited 5 seconds later.)
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,637
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,643
jodie !foster2PAQ replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,651
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,656
@1,131,636 (C)
> You piece of shit. Don't cite me. You asshole. I hope you die and your family explode.
Oooh, I seem to have touched a nerve. Now you seem a little hot under the collar. Clam down a little mate.
> You piece of shit. Don't cite me. You asshole. I hope you die and your family explode.
Oooh, I seem to have touched a nerve. Now you seem a little hot under the collar. Clam down a little mate.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,657
@1,131,616 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Its getting better and that's the point. Also most of the unemployment was caused by the lockdown
Its getting better and that's the point. Also most of the unemployment was caused by the lockdown
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 12 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,747
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Fake Anon has been cucked by CNN and is currently on suicide watch because orange man bad. Even Nancy Pelosi has tried to take the credit, that's how much Trump is winning
Fake Anon has been cucked by CNN and is currently on suicide watch because orange man bad. Even Nancy Pelosi has tried to take the credit, that's how much Trump is winning
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,767
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,769
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,779
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 25 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,780
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,804
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
how is a 13% unemployment rate not a bad thing at all
how is a 13% unemployment rate not a bad thing at all
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,835
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,840
This is a great day for George guys, hopefully he is looking down and thanking President Trump
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,906
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,920
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
compared to what? because compared to before the pandemic and compared to most other countries currently you are not doing great employment rate wise (not saying i blame trump for this entirely since it is very easy to fire ppl in the us)
compared to what? because compared to before the pandemic and compared to most other countries currently you are not doing great employment rate wise (not saying i blame trump for this entirely since it is very easy to fire ppl in the us)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,927
@previous (dw)
Its compared to during the pandemic. I feel like it's always okay to celebrate improvements
Its compared to during the pandemic. I feel like it's always okay to celebrate improvements
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,929
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
compared to during the pandemic where? the us is not leading in unemployment rates rn
compared to during the pandemic where? the us is not leading in unemployment rates rn
dw double-posted this 5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,931
mainly because you cant fire someone because of a health crisis in most of europe but still. why does usamerica always side with the rich?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,937
@1,131,929 (dw)
I meant, if the rates are better now than they were in the beginning of the pandemic, I am glad for that
I meant, if the rates are better now than they were in the beginning of the pandemic, I am glad for that
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 5 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,938
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,945
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
siding with the rich
@1,131,937 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
are they? when were those rates higher than they are now
siding with the rich
@1,131,937 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
are they? when were those rates higher than they are now
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,946
@previous (dw)
I meant, which rich are you referring to in this instance?
Also, they rates seem to be better than when the lockdown first started
I meant, which rich are you referring to in this instance?
Also, they rates seem to be better than when the lockdown first started
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,948
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)the rich who possess a lot of wealth. people who spend their $1200 on TVs. companies who have never answered to the protests of their workers. etc.
according to https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate the unemployment rate has gone up
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,953
@previous (dw)
I'm having a hard time understanding these numbers. It was already dropping?
Also, even poor people waste their stimulus checks on consumer goods
I'm having a hard time understanding these numbers. It was already dropping?
Also, even poor people waste their stimulus checks on consumer goods
dw replied with this 5 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,131,978
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
according to these numbers (which i cant/havent bothered to verify via official sources) the unemployment rate has more than tripled before lowering slightly. my point is that trump should have prevented a 14% unemployment rate from ever occuring
according to these numbers (which i cant/havent bothered to verify via official sources) the unemployment rate has more than tripled before lowering slightly. my point is that trump should have prevented a 14% unemployment rate from ever occuring