Topic: Will PRQ still be any good for hosting now that there is a fucktarded Cookie Law in the EU?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #10,030
It was looking like a promising option but now this ruins things.
So you cant use cookies or they will sue you for $100,000/day?
Where is there to turn to without PRQ? America doesn't have cookie law but has all kinds of other retardedness. China has censorship so that's a negative. So where do we host stuff? Some company in Russia maybe?
So you cant use cookies or they will sue you for $100,000/day?
Where is there to turn to without PRQ? America doesn't have cookie law but has all kinds of other retardedness. China has censorship so that's a negative. So where do we host stuff? Some company in Russia maybe?
ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #179,027
sup to4str
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #179,029
what
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #179,035
You can use cookies, but you have to allow them to approve of such cookies. Besides, there's always Russia and other Slavic nations to host shady Web sites from.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #179,036
sup to4str
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #179,098
@179,035 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
That sounds like a pointless law. They should have spent the money on an Internet safety awareness campaign instead.
That sounds like a pointless law. They should have spent the money on an Internet safety awareness campaign instead.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #179,103
> outlawing cookies> 2011
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 replied with this 15 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,139
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,165
@179,098 (F)
> That sounds like a pointless law. They should have spent the money on making police lrn2 pedobait
> That sounds like a pointless law. They should have spent the money on making police lrn2 pedobait
jump? joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,307
Can someone explain this law to me?
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,309
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,322
@179,307 (jump?)
Pretty interesting FAQ-type coverage here.
Here's an interesting snippet from the above that is probably relevant to the thread:
It sounds like they are talking about businesses here. I wonder how this will play out for personal sites or sites run by a smaller organization.
Pretty interesting FAQ-type coverage here.
Here's an interesting snippet from the above that is probably relevant to the thread:
The location of your hosting is irrelevant, but the location of your organisation is not. Your organisation must fall within the legal jurisdiction of the EU. Each member state has their own laws, which are based on the same EU directive, but may differ slightly.
For most small/medium organisations, being located in the EU will mean you must comply.
For most small/medium organisations, being located in the EU will mean you must comply.
It sounds like they are talking about businesses here. I wonder how this will play out for personal sites or sites run by a smaller organization.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,362
Eh, it's not that big a deal.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #179,366
> 2011> still not connected to the Wired