Topic: The madman finally does it. Trump gives payback to fake news and social media who push their liberal
Erik !AltRitexT6 started this discussion 5 years ago #100,134
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #1,129,287
Largely unconstitutional and R's will not like the powers granted by this to be wielded by the next Democratic president. If you think this is good you have been sadly misled!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 23 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,288
Mail in voting is RETARDED lol
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,289
blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,292
Fact checking is not a Liberal agenda
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,295
@previous (blom)
Twitter added their own content to Trumps content which led to CNN. Twitter stopped being a platform and became a publisher.
Twitter added their own content to Trumps content which led to CNN. Twitter stopped being a platform and became a publisher.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,296
"In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand-pick the speech that Americans may access and convey online. This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power"
This is the same Donald Trump who was recently demanding Chris Wallace be fired from Fox for "allowing" Democrat opinions on his show and then went on to urge his Twitter followers to stop watching the network because "they are no longer helping us get re-elected".
This is the same Donald Trump who was recently demanding Chris Wallace be fired from Fox for "allowing" Democrat opinions on his show and then went on to urge his Twitter followers to stop watching the network because "they are no longer helping us get re-elected".
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,297
> throwing a tantrum because he feels personally offended by Twitter contradicting his delusions
What a toddler. Why do so many people admire his emotional immaturity? It's fucking depressing.
What a toddler. Why do so many people admire his emotional immaturity? It's fucking depressing.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,298
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Why would Twitter add their content to Trumps tweets but not to tweets from Russia or China if they didn;t have an agenda
Why would Twitter add their content to Trumps tweets but not to tweets from Russia or China if they didn;t have an agenda
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 44 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,299
@1,129,289 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)So you dont think there will be widespread fraud if they mail out tens of millions of ballots?
This is like the opposite of voter ID at the polling stations.
Which method is likely to include fraud?
Should we not make every effort to avoid fraud?
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,300
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,301
@1,129,295 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Where did you get the idea that this is a legally significant distinction?
Where did you get the idea that this is a legally significant distinction?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,302
@1,129,299 (C)
I think it is irrelevant and yes I also do think there will not be widespread fraud. Just look at Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Utah, who have been mailing out collectively millions of ballots for years and have no significant fraud problems.
I think it is irrelevant and yes I also do think there will not be widespread fraud. Just look at Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Utah, who have been mailing out collectively millions of ballots for years and have no significant fraud problems.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,303
@1,129,298 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
> Why would Twitter add their content to Trumps tweets but not to tweets from Russia or China if they didn;t have an agenda
Twitter fact checks China:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833063
> Why would Twitter add their content to Trumps tweets but not to tweets from Russia or China if they didn;t have an agenda
Twitter fact checks China:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833063
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 12 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,304
With an attitude such as that you are definitely a part of the problem and not part of any solution.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,305
I know that Minichan's right wing aren't always the finest conservative thinkers of our generation, but they still find ways to disappoint me with their strongman worship.
In today's example, it is perfectly on the level for a nation's head of state to say the election is being rigged against him without any evidence, while a company that contradicts him on this are the ones with an agenda. It's somewhat depressing.
In today's example, it is perfectly on the level for a nation's head of state to say the election is being rigged against him without any evidence, while a company that contradicts him on this are the ones with an agenda. It's somewhat depressing.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 35 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,306
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,307
@1,129,305 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Isn't it funny when Trump said the 2016 election might be rigged against him then many came out to say that is impossable so when he did win they all came back out to say Russia rigged the election.
Isn't it funny when Trump said the 2016 election might be rigged against him then many came out to say that is impossable so when he did win they all came back out to say Russia rigged the election.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 3 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,308
@1,129,298 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Also, if someone (Trump in this case) is pretending to be outraged about a supposedly censorship-ridden pro-China platform that is seeking to undo the fabric of American freedoms, it's probably unwise to be the person who uses that platform more than literally any other human being on the face of the earth to spew his batshit insane conspiracy theories and call for the firing of highly respected journalists for "allowing" Democrat opinions on their shows.
Also, if someone (Trump in this case) is pretending to be outraged about a supposedly censorship-ridden pro-China platform that is seeking to undo the fabric of American freedoms, it's probably unwise to be the person who uses that platform more than literally any other human being on the face of the earth to spew his batshit insane conspiracy theories and call for the firing of highly respected journalists for "allowing" Democrat opinions on their shows.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,311
@1,129,307 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Not as funny as when he set up a commission on voter fraud to validate his claims, which then went on to find nothing and was quietly disbanded. It's almost like he doesn't care about the evidence and is knowingly lying about it.
Not as funny as when he set up a commission on voter fraud to validate his claims, which then went on to find nothing and was quietly disbanded. It's almost like he doesn't care about the evidence and is knowingly lying about it.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE double-posted this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,312
@1,129,307 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Also, they were saying that Russia influenced the election through things like social media, not that they actually comprimised the US voting system and rigged it so Trump won.
Also, they were saying that Russia influenced the election through things like social media, not that they actually comprimised the US voting system and rigged it so Trump won.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 58 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,313
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,314
@1,129,312 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Yes he is conflating two very different claims either because he wants to deliberately mislead or because he genuinely does not understand what he is talking about. Trump would always say that Dems would rig voting by having vote totals changed, letting millions of illegal immigrants vote in key swing states like...California and New York (it was never a very smart claim). Democrats countered by saying that basically there were 50 different elections being run, and there was no effective way to coordinate doing that even if you really wanted to. In that way, it was impossible to rig a presidential election.
What the Ruskies did is very far from that, and was a lot more of spreading disinformation and general fuckery. They didn't rig the election, they just interfered in it. The US should be no stranger to that, as it's done much worse than that to many Central and South American countries over the course of its history. This is just a dumb false equivalency.
This is all just a diversion by him to avoid revealing he doesn't even begin to understand the legal and constitutional flaws with this er...order. The toilet paper in my bathroom is more constitutional than 80% of this thing.
Yes he is conflating two very different claims either because he wants to deliberately mislead or because he genuinely does not understand what he is talking about. Trump would always say that Dems would rig voting by having vote totals changed, letting millions of illegal immigrants vote in key swing states like...California and New York (it was never a very smart claim). Democrats countered by saying that basically there were 50 different elections being run, and there was no effective way to coordinate doing that even if you really wanted to. In that way, it was impossible to rig a presidential election.
What the Ruskies did is very far from that, and was a lot more of spreading disinformation and general fuckery. They didn't rig the election, they just interfered in it. The US should be no stranger to that, as it's done much worse than that to many Central and South American countries over the course of its history. This is just a dumb false equivalency.
This is all just a diversion by him to avoid revealing he doesn't even begin to understand the legal and constitutional flaws with this er...order. The toilet paper in my bathroom is more constitutional than 80% of this thing.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,315
@1,129,313 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Is this some site that says right-wingers are bad?
I remember that one study that claimed powerful magnets to the brain could make people more acceptable to immigration. In other words, damaging ones brain helps you accept left wing policies.
Is this some site that says right-wingers are bad?
I remember that one study that claimed powerful magnets to the brain could make people more acceptable to immigration. In other words, damaging ones brain helps you accept left wing policies.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,316
@1,129,314 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Democrats countered by saying that basically there were 50 different elections being run, and there was no effective way to coordinate doing that even if you really wanted to. In that way, it was impossible to rig a presidential election.
This is a trick. They imply that to rig an election you need a super villen type character to coordinate it from the top down in a masterplan kind of way. In relality, it's done at a grassroots level by corrupt people who work within local elections and have little to lose.
> Democrats countered by saying that basically there were 50 different elections being run, and there was no effective way to coordinate doing that even if you really wanted to. In that way, it was impossible to rig a presidential election.
This is a trick. They imply that to rig an election you need a super villen type character to coordinate it from the top down in a masterplan kind of way. In relality, it's done at a grassroots level by corrupt people who work within local elections and have little to lose.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,317
@1,129,305 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
The motherfuckers start badmouthing and trying to impeach him on inauguration day and spend thousands of hours wasting time on that instead of doing work they could have done for the citizens of the country. Scheme after crooked scheme and thousands of lies trying to frame him for 4 years.
But you dont think they'd involve themselves in voting fraud?
You people are sick.
The motherfuckers start badmouthing and trying to impeach him on inauguration day and spend thousands of hours wasting time on that instead of doing work they could have done for the citizens of the country. Scheme after crooked scheme and thousands of lies trying to frame him for 4 years.
But you dont think they'd involve themselves in voting fraud?
You people are sick.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,318
@1,129,316 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
I mean just walk me logistically through how this would work. Even briefly. It's Novemebr 2016. How do you rig the election so that Trump is guaranteed to lose? (Leaving aside the fact that he didn't lose, thus disproving the whole conceit).
I mean just walk me logistically through how this would work. Even briefly. It's Novemebr 2016. How do you rig the election so that Trump is guaranteed to lose? (Leaving aside the fact that he didn't lose, thus disproving the whole conceit).
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,319
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,321
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,322
@1,129,319 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Well, one could set up a commission on electoral fraud to investigate the matter. Seeing as how that actually happened and it came up empty, either these numerous corrupt officials were all able to avoid detection by a hostile administration that was actively looking for them, or they don't really exist.
Well, one could set up a commission on electoral fraud to investigate the matter. Seeing as how that actually happened and it came up empty, either these numerous corrupt officials were all able to avoid detection by a hostile administration that was actively looking for them, or they don't really exist.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,323
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,324
He cries about freedom of speech, but he's willing to throw it out when some kid in a red hat gets his feelings hurt.Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,325
Bob joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,327
Lots of right wing Trump supporters here. Judging by the quality of the majority of posts, that makes sense.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,329
I'm tired of people being able to change a pic when someone else posts it on here. As far as I'm concerned it SHOULDN'T HAPPEN.
Its' a violation of free speech and Admin or mods who condone it or engage in it disgust me.
Bob replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,332
I don't think that it's an issue of free speech, it's an issue of not being a jerk. Moderators should only be able to remove material, not add it.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,333
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,335
@1,129,332 (Bob)It's a shitty practice to allow.
I'm fucking tired of it. It's wrong.
Any time I see it I will let it be known how much I think only faggots would allow it.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 5 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,336
Yeah, information should never be added to for reasons of politicisation.
That reminds me, remember when Trump drew over some official meteorological information with a Sharpie pen in order to avoid admitting he had no idea what he was talking about?
That reminds me, remember when Trump drew over some official meteorological information with a Sharpie pen in order to avoid admitting he had no idea what he was talking about?
Bob replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,338
@1,129,333 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
> This is Trumps point
Good point. However when someone in authority says something that is wrong, I don't have a problem with it. Let's suppose that Obama wrote on his Twitter account before the 2016 election "due to large number of voters the Presidential election is on Tuesday November 8th if you are voting Democrat, it's Wednesday 9th for other parties" I would expect Twitter to fact check it.
> This is Trumps point
Good point. However when someone in authority says something that is wrong, I don't have a problem with it. Let's suppose that Obama wrote on his Twitter account before the 2016 election "due to large number of voters the Presidential election is on Tuesday November 8th if you are voting Democrat, it's Wednesday 9th for other parties" I would expect Twitter to fact check it.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,339
I have to confess, while I initially thought that those image edits were too on the nose, it's led a to a highly chucklesome bit of meta-comedy. Maybe there needs to be legislation against small chans, next?
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE double-posted this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,343
@1,129,329 (C)
@1,129,335 (C)
Here, I'll use my image permissions for good. I added some cool pictures of Trump to your posts.
@1,129,335 (C)
Here, I'll use my image permissions for good. I added some cool pictures of Trump to your posts.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,346
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,348
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,350
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,487
@1,129,295 (Erik !AltRitexT6)They finally added a fact check label to one of his tweets, eh. I've been wondering when they would get the balls to do it. This isn't a new thing they're doing just for Donald, btw
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,488
This kid in the cartoon is underage. Why are we allowing this? And its clearly a mod doing it. Gross
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 59 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,489
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,491
blom replied with this 5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,492
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,578
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,579
To be fair though, if twitter was shut down, nothing of value would be lost. Prove me wrong!
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,608
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,609
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 48 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,129,615
