Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,063
@previous (B)
Google it. It is in the major news. Twitter fact checked his maniacal bullshit. He said he wants to shut down social media. Now he will sign an executive order “about Twitter”. Fucking dictator.
Anonymous B replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,068
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 46 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,072
He'll just make it say something like "it is illegal to be mean to the president or do anything when he lies using your platform" and it will be totally unenforceable but make its way to the Supreme Court or something retarded like that. He is petty and a drama queen and only pretends to be authoritarian. At the end of the day he's just a brat manchild that surrounds himself with sycophants, not a terrifying dictator.
Anonymous B replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,073
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You're full of poop, dude.
Anonymous B double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,074
@1,129,072 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Up your nose, with a rubber hose.
I think that's called intubation.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 8 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,129,075
> You Trumpnecks alright with this fucking dictatorship?
I think the fact that they aren't all right with it is why Trump wants to reign in Twitters dicratorship.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,128
oh it's making sites legally accountable for their fact-checking services. dude's so mad he got owned on twitter that i'm surprised he didn't shit himself, which puts him ahead of biden
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,132
So if adding a fact check link to the President's tweets is merely practicing free speech, then why doesn't he want people to do it? Isn't anyone's right to call someone out on their bullshit?
DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,133
@previous (G)
But what when you call out his "bullshit" but it actually isn't bullshit. Just remember last elections, Trump said he fears the elections will be rigged and DNC spent months touting how it's impossible to rig them. After they lost then went on a 3 years long witch hunt to show he rigged the elections with the Russians.
So yeah, who watches the watchers? And we already know google/fb/twitter steer the narrative to fit the left agenda, it's been proven times and times, so the things they mark as "fact check" can be just that, pushing a narrative that suits them.
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,136
Yeah it's a good idea. They shouldn't have screwed with his message
Anonymous G replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,138
@1,129,133 (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew) > But what when you call out his "bullshit" but it actually isn't bullshit. Just remember last elections, Trump said he fears the elections will be rigged and DNC spent months touting how it's impossible to rig them. After they lost then went on a 3 years long witch hunt to show he rigged the elections with the Russians.
You seem to have mistaken "influenced" with "rigged" or "hacked" here. Those are all different words in the English language. I forgive you for not understanding the nuances, but you should probably read the material more closely to better understand what is being implied.
> And we already know google/fb/twitter steer the narrative to fit the left agenda, it's been proven times and times
I'm pretty sure that's fake news, bro. It's been proven times and times. I've been part of "follow parties" on Twitter with right-wing bot accounts that got banned a few weeks later for being shitty bot accounts. Some accounts being banned that all popped online at exactly the same time to retweet some Breitbart story isn't proof censorship of anything other than bots.
There's no shortage of right wing weirdos on Twitter or Facebook, even now. This whole right-wing persecution narrative gets older and more stale every time I check Twitter to see a bunch of raving right-wing bullshit about Bill Gates, vaccines, and lockdowns. There's no shortage of any of that either on Facebook, YouTube, or Twitter. No one seems to be suppressing anything but the most dangerous rumors and only once it looks like they might find themselves legally liable for spreading dangerous rumors. I'm calling bullshit on this whole "left agenda" thing you pretend is happening.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,129,152