Topic: HEY: jerk face flooding my inbox with spam about harlots and jubilee starshine - shut the fuck up
squeegee started this discussion 3 years ago #106,363
i stopped posting here years ago. wtf? why are you bothering me with this garbage trolling? i have kids now, i'm fucking busy. leave me out of your psychotic circle jerking. i piss on your faces. fuck off.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,195,069
Whew that's a relief! For a minute there I thought you went insane and trooned out 😂👌
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,070
wat…
❤ Harlot ❤ joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,072
Nice try, queermo. Fucking jerk ass.
Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,105
@1,195,069 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Can you imagine if the real squeegee put on a dress and pranced around like a little girly girl.
Can you imagine if the real squeegee put on a dress and pranced around like a little girly girl.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 29 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,109
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,399
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,422
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,423
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,424
@1,195,105 (Erik !AltRitexT6)actually, no, i bet i bring it up —i bet i bring up all kinda things around here. all the time. 3 or 4 times a day sometimes. that sounds like something that absolutely happens. huh.
Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 3 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,427
@1,195,423 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@previous (❤ Harlot ❤)
I'm not proud but I will admit I jerked off to these pictures.
@previous (❤ Harlot ❤)
I'm not proud but I will admit I jerked off to these pictures.
Erik !AltRitexT6 double-posted this 3 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,428
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,433
@1,195,427 (Erik !AltRitexT6)you don't have to be, i'm proud enough of my appearance for the both of us, going back to 2019 i've had a surplus of pride, you don't have to spend any of yours. but thank you for the generous offer.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,436
@1,195,428 (Erik !AltRitexT6)they're still a little young to be answering to pet names from european men. but i won't lie, self control is not high up on my list of priorities.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,437
why it should be high up on the list beyond building anticipation is a bit of a head polisher, huh?Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,438
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,449
@1,195,427 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
> I'm not proud but I will admit I jerked off to these pictures.
Yikes
> I'm not proud but I will admit I jerked off to these pictures.
Yikes
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,451
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 40 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,452
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,454
@1,195,438 (Erik !AltRitexT6)u sure?
@1,195,449 (H)
@1,195,451 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
oh hai, look who it is, the "just here for the commentary," fellas. and becky?
shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,457
Oof
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,458
@1,195,433 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,436 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,437 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,454 (❤ Harlot ❤)
why post these old crossdressing photos ...
@1,195,423 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,424 (❤ Harlot ❤)
... when you have these new photos?
@1,195,436 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,437 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,454 (❤ Harlot ❤)
why post these old crossdressing photos ...
@1,195,423 (❤ Harlot ❤)
@1,195,424 (❤ Harlot ❤)
... when you have these new photos?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,459
@1,195,454 (❤ Harlot ❤)
Call me old-fashioned, but I think it's inappropriate for a man currently cheating on his girlfriend with a coworker to tell a third person that he whacks off to their photos. He can't even be faithful to the person he's cheating with!
Call me old-fashioned, but I think it's inappropriate for a man currently cheating on his girlfriend with a coworker to tell a third person that he whacks off to their photos. He can't even be faithful to the person he's cheating with!
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,461
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,462
@1,195,459 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
yeah, cool story bro. mind ur business. svet's cool suddenly, relax.
yeah, cool story bro. mind ur business. svet's cool suddenly, relax.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,463
@1,195,459 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Svet must have gorilla levels of T to be as horny as he is
Also he's exceptionally Hairy, he should run a 24 and me and check to see if he has any zoo keeper ancestry
Svet must have gorilla levels of T to be as horny as he is
Also he's exceptionally Hairy, he should run a 24 and me and check to see if he has any zoo keeper ancestry
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,464
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,466
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,467
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,468
@1,195,463 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What is “zoo keeper ancestry”? Is that some sort of meme racist dog whistle I’m unaware of?
What is “zoo keeper ancestry”? Is that some sort of meme racist dog whistle I’m unaware of?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,469
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,471
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It’s funny when you try to be sarcastic because your normal posts read like an alien pretending to be human so when you try to be sarcastic it’s nearly indistinguishable from when you post sincerely
It’s funny when you try to be sarcastic because your normal posts read like an alien pretending to be human so when you try to be sarcastic it’s nearly indistinguishable from when you post sincerely
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,473
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,479
@1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That has nothing to do with me. That has svet's business written all over it. Cool down.
That has nothing to do with me. That has svet's business written all over it. Cool down.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 49 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,480
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,482
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,485
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,493
@1,195,473 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> That's because you're autistic and don't understand intent
If one must be autistic to understand what “zoo keeper ancestry” means then I am thankfully autistic
> That's because you're autistic and don't understand intent
If one must be autistic to understand what “zoo keeper ancestry” means then I am thankfully autistic
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,494
@1,195,485 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You said he is honest and he isnt
You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
You have issues
> You said he is honest and he isnt
You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
You have issues
Anonymous H triple-posted this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,495
kook is like those people who find the most pedantic reasons to hate on a person like “oh look there aren’t any pictures in their room that means they are empty and suffering depression”
Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,496
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,497
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,509
@1,195,495 (H)
> Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix
Kimmo? Welcome back
> Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix
Kimmo? Welcome back
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 18 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,617
@1,195,494 (H)
she could stop at any time, but instigates without any forthought. i read her replies to this 12 hours ago and i typed out a flippant observation which would have elicited a response from her - a denial and redirection...
@1,195,495 (H)
which would have been a projection that i summarized and related to this comment which was a dismissive assessment of her character, and she would have made a baseless attack in line with @1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) where she tries shaming svet, as you said by "dredging up the complete history of that person's credibility" to try and get me on the defensive with her usual Texas sharpshooter, tu quoque style strawman based slothful induction and false dilemma gish galloping that, i promise you, she's not even aware of the entire cluster and how she propagates through her argument methodology except where she uses deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC).
because that's how she constructs the narrative conclusion in her mind that lets her -and sometimes others view her as an authority with which post hoc ergo propter hoc appeals may be validated. and people may just agree her argument style sucks, because it's combative, petty, pedantic -whatever, but that doesn't make her wrong. which is the gish gallop that informally shakes out from her convoluted narrative (giant universe of facts) as conclusions based in fallacies of composition or division by anyone observing the thread and not directly participating in the arguments or is dismissed as irrelevant bickering by anyone who doesn't want to deal with the "brain hurt" to bother keeping up with the dissonance and perceive her false cause assumptions to be sincerely unintentional, and not deliberately insincere generalizations - such as svet having animalistic attributes she implies comes from family history of bestiality @1,195,463 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) or that you're a fucking retard who lacks the ability to understand the superior correctness of the meaning encoded into her expert assertions @1,195,473 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) which obviously aren't baseless insults.
in a thread that appeared to be obliterating ANY credibility that I had before i demonstrated the claim that everything about me is a hoax being used to troll squeegee, who turned into a raging dickhead that no one should regard positively and seemingly delivered on a silver platter her lionization. which stood for a day after my quick and impotent defenestration "nice try" and the uncharacteristically squeegee slur "queermo" which, don't lie, made everyone think, "yeah, no, harlot is an imposter squeegee - that bandwagon was constructed and pushed by kook the first week i started posting, and she had nothing to add at all until a day later when i said "ohai" @1,195,422 (❤ Harlot ❤) showing any conclusions along these lines @1,195,069, (Meta !Sober//iZs) @1,195,105, (Erik !AltRitexT6) or even puzzling doubt @1,195,399 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE) to be moot.
and it was a handful of hours later, after a flurry of alluring selfies and, i won't lie, VERY flattering and complimentary "whacking off" as kook called it (i call it the penultimate form of praise second only to seeing Cum-Tribution pics. and there is a LOT of agreement on this - https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-react-if-someone-ejaculates-on-your-image) who suddenly felt the need to slander his character, mock his appearance (believe me, be hairy guys, her criticisms are opportunistic and insincere, she said it herself intention is just another word for strategy, or tactic or contrivance. she doesn't use personal attacks and insults insincerely to hurt you - you know it's bullshit so why should it cause YOU real distress? her intention is actually a tactic to help HER larger strategy of composing the self-aggrandized narrative of her own authority to perpetually instigate divisions based on whatever conveniences HER. you be the furry, musky, pheromone dripping, horny perpetual fuck machines God put on this earth to be instruments of arousal that real women (yeah, i'm making the no true scotsman fallacy and i know it, and you know it, and kook knows it's false and that means it's literally not insulting anyone, BUT IM DOING IT ANYWAY specifically to BE insulting as a rhetorical weapon to demonstrate my complete understanding and contrived ability to manipulate the thoughts of others at will and to cast hurt, or deny injury simultaneously or render irrelevance while also begging the question: assume much?) find incredibly validating, arousing and formulates the kind of consent and permissiveness that desire intends to control or be controlled, which is god damned hot as fuck. and that is legal tender. put it in your pocket, take that to the bank on monday, and deposit that - it spends like cash. and how dare anyone get between a man and the bewbs he's anticipating. and i was not confused even a little that i very correctly imply refer their motion through relative inertial frames owing to their sizeable mass. and no worries, there's no one taking y'all's pride as currency. svet's sizeable amounts of honesty land like a pair of gongs crash tossed to the pavement so deafening you can feel how loud they ring out. you can see how loud in the quivering vitreous wavering your vision like clanging bells.
i was going the whole golden rule route, cause you know kook, she can say whatever thoughtless, inconsiderate, hasty assertion thet get's her off. but does she reciprocate? fuck no. she can fuck up anyone she wants, but she can't dick from anyone. suddenly we're wrong, or dishonest, have characteristics that deserve to be mocked, are mentally faulty, or, k, irrelevant and inconsequential.
@1,195,485 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You said he is honest and he isnt
honey, how about you correctly characterize what i just got done saying about you. how about you demonstrate your understanding of MY intent, before you dismiss it anything as abjectly wrong and you tell everyone how you're right. explain to me what it is i THINK is right. does that make sense in a way that you understand correctly?
cause, let's be real, i could be wrong about you and just assumed a bunch of bullshit to very insincerely mischaracterize you to make myself out to be, idk, normal? help me out, explain what i mean, cause tbh idk why anyone would take me seriously, side with me on anything, or ever defer to my judgement regardless of how sincerely i gaslight and whether i do it thoughtlessly by sincerely careless reflex, or spend 18 hours on thoughtful intentional insincere cruelty.
i think i'd have to do a little self reflection, and stare deep into seeing myself and just scroll past like i'm some silly meme to lol agree with, i'd want to see every single detail. never know unless there's spit on hands, clap'em together EAGER and vigorous polishing before anyone gets their hands tarnished. so, idk why you felt the need to interject cross conversational insults and repeatedly ridiculed the only man with balls big enough to admit a lack of pride at admitting the very thing you have ceaselessly explained is so clearly denied to ME which has been of great concern to your open minded LGBTQ+ affirming sense of alliance that you would never ridicule to your own advantage. you may want to ponder on that before you declare yourself to possess a tarnish free golden rule.
i certainly don't think i'm the smartest person here, not because i KNOW i'm not, but i'd be making the mistake that would ultimately prove me to be a fucking idiot if i underestimated how gigantic anyone's balls are and get my bell rung like with cartoonish exaggeration because it's funny.
idk, she could just stop at any time. tbh, she doesn't have to answer to me. i don't expect she'll care. i've said it before, at least 3 times, we can be cool or we can not care to be cool. it's whatever. i'm no better than her. i may not think i'm worse. but idk, i'f i'm being real about it. maybe i'm just capable enough, or careless enough, or flippant enough or cruel enough, or bullied enough, or maybe i'm just fucking stupid enough to not to be concerned with regretting anything, and keep it up, and not listen to what multiple people tell me i'm doing wrong, and assuming that a lack of anyone telling me i'm right even noticeably ALSO doesn't inform me in any way that's relevant.
idk. i have more important things i'd rather have the answer to.
she could stop at any time, but instigates without any forthought. i read her replies to this 12 hours ago and i typed out a flippant observation which would have elicited a response from her - a denial and redirection...
@1,195,495 (H)
which would have been a projection that i summarized and related to this comment which was a dismissive assessment of her character, and she would have made a baseless attack in line with @1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) where she tries shaming svet, as you said by "dredging up the complete history of that person's credibility" to try and get me on the defensive with her usual Texas sharpshooter, tu quoque style strawman based slothful induction and false dilemma gish galloping that, i promise you, she's not even aware of the entire cluster and how she propagates through her argument methodology except where she uses deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC).
because that's how she constructs the narrative conclusion in her mind that lets her -and sometimes others view her as an authority with which post hoc ergo propter hoc appeals may be validated. and people may just agree her argument style sucks, because it's combative, petty, pedantic -whatever, but that doesn't make her wrong. which is the gish gallop that informally shakes out from her convoluted narrative (giant universe of facts) as conclusions based in fallacies of composition or division by anyone observing the thread and not directly participating in the arguments or is dismissed as irrelevant bickering by anyone who doesn't want to deal with the "brain hurt" to bother keeping up with the dissonance and perceive her false cause assumptions to be sincerely unintentional, and not deliberately insincere generalizations - such as svet having animalistic attributes she implies comes from family history of bestiality @1,195,463 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) or that you're a fucking retard who lacks the ability to understand the superior correctness of the meaning encoded into her expert assertions @1,195,473 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) which obviously aren't baseless insults.
in a thread that appeared to be obliterating ANY credibility that I had before i demonstrated the claim that everything about me is a hoax being used to troll squeegee, who turned into a raging dickhead that no one should regard positively and seemingly delivered on a silver platter her lionization. which stood for a day after my quick and impotent defenestration "nice try" and the uncharacteristically squeegee slur "queermo" which, don't lie, made everyone think, "yeah, no, harlot is an imposter squeegee - that bandwagon was constructed and pushed by kook the first week i started posting, and she had nothing to add at all until a day later when i said "ohai" @1,195,422 (❤ Harlot ❤) showing any conclusions along these lines @1,195,069, (Meta !Sober//iZs) @1,195,105, (Erik !AltRitexT6) or even puzzling doubt @1,195,399 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE) to be moot.
and it was a handful of hours later, after a flurry of alluring selfies and, i won't lie, VERY flattering and complimentary "whacking off" as kook called it (i call it the penultimate form of praise second only to seeing Cum-Tribution pics. and there is a LOT of agreement on this - https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-react-if-someone-ejaculates-on-your-image) who suddenly felt the need to slander his character, mock his appearance (believe me, be hairy guys, her criticisms are opportunistic and insincere, she said it herself intention is just another word for strategy, or tactic or contrivance. she doesn't use personal attacks and insults insincerely to hurt you - you know it's bullshit so why should it cause YOU real distress? her intention is actually a tactic to help HER larger strategy of composing the self-aggrandized narrative of her own authority to perpetually instigate divisions based on whatever conveniences HER. you be the furry, musky, pheromone dripping, horny perpetual fuck machines God put on this earth to be instruments of arousal that real women (yeah, i'm making the no true scotsman fallacy and i know it, and you know it, and kook knows it's false and that means it's literally not insulting anyone, BUT IM DOING IT ANYWAY specifically to BE insulting as a rhetorical weapon to demonstrate my complete understanding and contrived ability to manipulate the thoughts of others at will and to cast hurt, or deny injury simultaneously or render irrelevance while also begging the question: assume much?) find incredibly validating, arousing and formulates the kind of consent and permissiveness that desire intends to control or be controlled, which is god damned hot as fuck. and that is legal tender. put it in your pocket, take that to the bank on monday, and deposit that - it spends like cash. and how dare anyone get between a man and the bewbs he's anticipating. and i was not confused even a little that i very correctly imply refer their motion through relative inertial frames owing to their sizeable mass. and no worries, there's no one taking y'all's pride as currency. svet's sizeable amounts of honesty land like a pair of gongs crash tossed to the pavement so deafening you can feel how loud they ring out. you can see how loud in the quivering vitreous wavering your vision like clanging bells.
i was going the whole golden rule route, cause you know kook, she can say whatever thoughtless, inconsiderate, hasty assertion thet get's her off. but does she reciprocate? fuck no. she can fuck up anyone she wants, but she can't dick from anyone. suddenly we're wrong, or dishonest, have characteristics that deserve to be mocked, are mentally faulty, or, k, irrelevant and inconsequential.
@1,195,485 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You said he is honest and he isnt
honey, how about you correctly characterize what i just got done saying about you. how about you demonstrate your understanding of MY intent, before you dismiss it anything as abjectly wrong and you tell everyone how you're right. explain to me what it is i THINK is right. does that make sense in a way that you understand correctly?
cause, let's be real, i could be wrong about you and just assumed a bunch of bullshit to very insincerely mischaracterize you to make myself out to be, idk, normal? help me out, explain what i mean, cause tbh idk why anyone would take me seriously, side with me on anything, or ever defer to my judgement regardless of how sincerely i gaslight and whether i do it thoughtlessly by sincerely careless reflex, or spend 18 hours on thoughtful intentional insincere cruelty.
i think i'd have to do a little self reflection, and stare deep into seeing myself and just scroll past like i'm some silly meme to lol agree with, i'd want to see every single detail. never know unless there's spit on hands, clap'em together EAGER and vigorous polishing before anyone gets their hands tarnished. so, idk why you felt the need to interject cross conversational insults and repeatedly ridiculed the only man with balls big enough to admit a lack of pride at admitting the very thing you have ceaselessly explained is so clearly denied to ME which has been of great concern to your open minded LGBTQ+ affirming sense of alliance that you would never ridicule to your own advantage. you may want to ponder on that before you declare yourself to possess a tarnish free golden rule.
i certainly don't think i'm the smartest person here, not because i KNOW i'm not, but i'd be making the mistake that would ultimately prove me to be a fucking idiot if i underestimated how gigantic anyone's balls are and get my bell rung like with cartoonish exaggeration because it's funny.
idk, she could just stop at any time. tbh, she doesn't have to answer to me. i don't expect she'll care. i've said it before, at least 3 times, we can be cool or we can not care to be cool. it's whatever. i'm no better than her. i may not think i'm worse. but idk, i'f i'm being real about it. maybe i'm just capable enough, or careless enough, or flippant enough or cruel enough, or bullied enough, or maybe i'm just fucking stupid enough to not to be concerned with regretting anything, and keep it up, and not listen to what multiple people tell me i'm doing wrong, and assuming that a lack of anyone telling me i'm right even noticeably ALSO doesn't inform me in any way that's relevant.
idk. i have more important things i'd rather have the answer to.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,618
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,621
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 11 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,622
only because Svet did it right, and didn't ask. he came to me like a proper degenerate, and said let's see em.Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,623
Autogynephilia.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,624
@1,195,621 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
that's what i figured you'd say. i pointed that out. that was for everyone else. to read and see how much care you have for what anyone says. and bonus how much you regard your opinion to speak for eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeveryone else. nicely done. kook. i couldn't have planned it better if i'd actually been trying.
that's what i figured you'd say. i pointed that out. that was for everyone else. to read and see how much care you have for what anyone says. and bonus how much you regard your opinion to speak for eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeveryone else. nicely done. kook. i couldn't have planned it better if i'd actually been trying.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,626
Anonymous N replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,628
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> sis
Men who perform femininity and adhere to ridiculous sexist stereotypes are still men. OP is a male and may that fact stay with him and pierce his heart like a knife. 😗
> sis
Men who perform femininity and adhere to ridiculous sexist stereotypes are still men. OP is a male and may that fact stay with him and pierce his heart like a knife. 😗
Anonymous N double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,629
@1,195,622 (❤ Harlot ❤)
So womanly! 🥰 Womanhood is when you dress up in lingerie and be all pink and show the internet 🥰🥰🥰
So womanly! 🥰 Womanhood is when you dress up in lingerie and be all pink and show the internet 🥰🥰🥰
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,630
1 minute and 6 seconds. is how long you spent considering what i said before abjectly declaring it irrelevant. i spent more time on appreciating and complimenting svet's gargantuan testacles than you ever spent considering the validity of a single negative judgement with which you denigrate the credibility of others. everything disparaging you say, i guarantee is true about you and you deflect it onto others with a speed that tells me you already knew that.
you're a liar without actual commitment to honor vows. but you have sexual disfunction problems are cast aspersions on people with healthy libido. because YOU have zoo keeper ancestry on the mind. which, i gotta say, is a weirdly out of place and oddly specific and unusual term for zoophilia. is that it kook? u fuck animals? is that why you're such a alien pretending to be human?
yikes. i felt bad about this post for one minute 6 seconds
you're a liar without actual commitment to honor vows. but you have sexual disfunction problems are cast aspersions on people with healthy libido. because YOU have zoo keeper ancestry on the mind. which, i gotta say, is a weirdly out of place and oddly specific and unusual term for zoophilia. is that it kook? u fuck animals? is that why you're such a alien pretending to be human?
yikes. i felt bad about this post for one minute 6 seconds
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,631
no one cares. this game is by is your rules, kook.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,632
@1,195,628 (N)
@1,195,629 (N)
i really touched on this one's gender insecurity. who're you trying to convince? your brain, or your erection?
@1,195,629 (N)
i really touched on this one's gender insecurity. who're you trying to convince? your brain, or your erection?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,633
@1,195,630 (❤ Harlot ❤)
You fully creep me out and I never meet women who act like this, who aren't prostitutes
Which checks out because before you transitioned, that's the only type of female who would hang out with you
You fully creep me out and I never meet women who act like this, who aren't prostitutes
Which checks out because before you transitioned, that's the only type of female who would hang out with you
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 0 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,634
@1,195,626 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
honey, it's never been about male validation. that you seem to think so tells me u don't understand the human sexuality. u think it should be like a dog humping you your leg doesn't validate you. that would be wrong. you taking advantage, manipulating and controlling "lesser beings" validates you. that's all you respect.
honey, it's never been about male validation. that you seem to think so tells me u don't understand the human sexuality. u think it should be like a dog humping you your leg doesn't validate you. that would be wrong. you taking advantage, manipulating and controlling "lesser beings" validates you. that's all you respect.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,635
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,636
@1,195,633 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
see, i called it.
"and she would have made a baseless attack in line with @1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) where she tries shaming svet, as you said by "dredging up the complete history of that person's credibility" to try and get me on the defensive with her usual Texas sharpshooter, tu quoque style strawman"
see, i called it.
"and she would have made a baseless attack in line with @1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) where she tries shaming svet, as you said by "dredging up the complete history of that person's credibility" to try and get me on the defensive with her usual Texas sharpshooter, tu quoque style strawman"
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,637
@1,195,635 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
was that a slothful induction and false dilemma rounding out the gish gallop?
predictably pavlovian response: check
was that a slothful induction and false dilemma rounding out the gish gallop?
predictably pavlovian response: check
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 8 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,638
@1,195,636 (❤ Harlot ❤)
Oh its not baseless, we can read what you type
You're fully creepy and can't seem to help it
Oh its not baseless, we can read what you type
You're fully creepy and can't seem to help it
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,639
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,640
@1,195,638 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
we? oh, you mean you and the bandwagon you're loading up with insincere ad-hominems? predictable: check
we? oh, you mean you and the bandwagon you're loading up with insincere ad-hominems? predictable: check
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,641
@previous (❤ Harlot ❤)
What bandwagon? You fully creep me out. Maybe everyone else here loves to hear your oversexualized, pick me talk
What bandwagon? You fully creep me out. Maybe everyone else here loves to hear your oversexualized, pick me talk
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,642
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,643
like, wtf kook. are you really panicking right now or what? i'm not even trying. i'm drinking milk.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,644
give it a rest for 5 minutes, think about dropping it at any time and i'll come up with some clever ways to say hi
"sniff snifff"
nailed it.
"sniff snifff"
nailed it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,645
@1,195,643 (❤ Harlot ❤)
No I'm not panicking. I'm on a boring car ride to pick up a vehicle we purchased for a fora member
No I'm not panicking. I'm on a boring car ride to pick up a vehicle we purchased for a fora member
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 58 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,646
@1,195,642 (❤ Harlot ❤)
You fuck men who beat you because you believe that behavior means they're "super straight"
You fuck men who beat you because you believe that behavior means they're "super straight"
Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,647
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,666
@1,195,641 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
WE. implying purality. that there is a WE reading my posts and determine your shit tier projection to have a basis. stop with the incredulousness, hasty generalizations @1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) correlation/causation fallacies @1,195,641 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) ad hominems @1,195,633 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and no true scotsman BASELESSNESS
because you still haven't expressed that you can correctly evaluate anything i said about you. it's just deny deny deny, cry cry cry, bully bully bully. character attacks, incredulousness, and intentional mischaracterizations attacking strawmen that you claim are representative of anything i've said.
you're childish, weak and stupid. don't forget that, you need to change that about yourself ashley, or you'll fuck up your life just like you fucked up your morning.
you're welcome to stop it and quit fucking up your day any time you like.
@1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
you suck dog dick and probably mutilate cats or something "thrilling" you serial killer obsessed liar.
did i just make that up out of thin air and magically uncover hidden truths like you think people believe you are an authority on because they know you'll slander them with libelous claims publicly because you don't think consequences apply to you?
that would be ludicrously reckless to leave unqualified as as wishful thinking.
i wonder if your lack of autism means you understand intention or just desperately hope to be so offensive no one would stoop to your level.
you seem to already think i'm punching up at you, so i guess you expect everyone believes your giant universe of libelous facts will defame me.
which you can stop aaaaaany time you're welcome to stop. no apology needed.
unless you wanna keep it up. it's whatever you want to do. but i suggest you keep svet's name outta your bitch mouth.
WE. implying purality. that there is a WE reading my posts and determine your shit tier projection to have a basis. stop with the incredulousness, hasty generalizations @1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) correlation/causation fallacies @1,195,641 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) ad hominems @1,195,633 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and no true scotsman BASELESSNESS
because you still haven't expressed that you can correctly evaluate anything i said about you. it's just deny deny deny, cry cry cry, bully bully bully. character attacks, incredulousness, and intentional mischaracterizations attacking strawmen that you claim are representative of anything i've said.
you're childish, weak and stupid. don't forget that, you need to change that about yourself ashley, or you'll fuck up your life just like you fucked up your morning.
you're welcome to stop it and quit fucking up your day any time you like.
@1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
you suck dog dick and probably mutilate cats or something "thrilling" you serial killer obsessed liar.
did i just make that up out of thin air and magically uncover hidden truths like you think people believe you are an authority on because they know you'll slander them with libelous claims publicly because you don't think consequences apply to you?
that would be ludicrously reckless to leave unqualified as as wishful thinking.
i wonder if your lack of autism means you understand intention or just desperately hope to be so offensive no one would stoop to your level.
you seem to already think i'm punching up at you, so i guess you expect everyone believes your giant universe of libelous facts will defame me.
which you can stop aaaaaany time you're welcome to stop. no apology needed.
unless you wanna keep it up. it's whatever you want to do. but i suggest you keep svet's name outta your bitch mouth.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,667
@1,195,647 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
[email protected]
what's this about a collection? you're saving them?
you cad. ur terrible.
[email protected]
what's this about a collection? you're saving them?
you cad. ur terrible.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,669
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,671
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,675
@1,195,669 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)abracadabra?
@previous (L)
how about you give me a 3 hour ban. i would accept a timeout with a length up to your discretion. yes.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,677
i'm just concerned about kooks current state of mind. i'll accept in her behalf. it's the nicest thing i can do. which is nothing.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,679
@1,195,675 (❤ Harlot ❤)
Why do you think suggestive pics will hurt me? I warned you it wouldn't be smart to post them
Why do you think suggestive pics will hurt me? I warned you it wouldn't be smart to post them
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,680
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 58 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,685
@1,195,677 (❤ Harlot ❤)
> i'm just concerned about kooks current state of mind. i'll accept in her behalf. it's the nicest thing i can do. which is nothing.
I don't know about you but it sure as hell ain't Kook whose state of mind I'm worried about at the moment.
> i'm just concerned about kooks current state of mind. i'll accept in her behalf. it's the nicest thing i can do. which is nothing.
I don't know about you but it sure as hell ain't Kook whose state of mind I'm worried about at the moment.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,686
@1,195,679 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
assume much? i thoroughly explained who's unnecessarily denigrated pride was spent as payment in full
who insincerely demands to be an any above reproach while also sabotaging the concerns and pins failure to the victims who are then judged to BE failures and also deserve to be ridiculed for it and called creepy.
and what that says about you fundamentally as a person, and your carelessness and lack of self self reflection to even explain what i intend be concluded. you just hastily generalize everything wrong, attack my character and you never answer counter arguments to your simplistic strawmen and you allege some very specific and reputation damaging facts you insist aren't satirical and are literal and stake your self as the authority on those assertions.
while also reminding me of the threat you warned me would happen if i didn't do as you suggested.
@1,195,680 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
which meds ashley? and for what conditions are you suggesting i'm being treated for?
do tell.
assume much? i thoroughly explained who's unnecessarily denigrated pride was spent as payment in full
who insincerely demands to be an any above reproach while also sabotaging the concerns and pins failure to the victims who are then judged to BE failures and also deserve to be ridiculed for it and called creepy.
and what that says about you fundamentally as a person, and your carelessness and lack of self self reflection to even explain what i intend be concluded. you just hastily generalize everything wrong, attack my character and you never answer counter arguments to your simplistic strawmen and you allege some very specific and reputation damaging facts you insist aren't satirical and are literal and stake your self as the authority on those assertions.
while also reminding me of the threat you warned me would happen if i didn't do as you suggested.
@1,195,680 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
which meds ashley? and for what conditions are you suggesting i'm being treated for?
do tell.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,687
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,689
@1,195,685 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
please don't be all cryptic if you're truly concerned about someone. please, be very specific, what and who exactly are you worried about, and why do you have such glib concern?
please don't be all cryptic if you're truly concerned about someone. please, be very specific, what and who exactly are you worried about, and why do you have such glib concern?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,690
@1,195,686 (❤ Harlot ❤)
You seem like you're manic and have bpd
And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
You seem like you're manic and have bpd
And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 40 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,691
@1,195,687 (❤ Harlot ❤)
You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
@1,195,689 (❤ Harlot ❤)
Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
@1,195,689 (❤ Harlot ❤)
Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
Meta !Sober//iZs double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,694
@1,195,689 (❤ Harlot ❤)
I am very happy for your transition. I want everyone to live their true selves. I believe your body belongs to you and it is your unalienable right to do with it what you will.
But I am also very worried about you.
I am very happy for your transition. I want everyone to live their true selves. I believe your body belongs to you and it is your unalienable right to do with it what you will.
But I am also very worried about you.
Meta !Sober//iZs triple-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,695
If you don't want my concern let me know and I will put your name on my ignore list and just pretend you left Minichan again.
But I am not joking here I am REALLY worried about you.
But I am not joking here I am REALLY worried about you.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,696
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,697
@previous (❤ Harlot ❤)
I don't know what recreational drugs you take or have taken. I don't know what prescription drugs, if any, you regularly take. I don't know what, if any, psychiatric history you have.
There are a lot of variables at play here and I don't know the whole picture. What do I know is: you are not acting normal.
I don't know what recreational drugs you take or have taken. I don't know what prescription drugs, if any, you regularly take. I don't know what, if any, psychiatric history you have.
There are a lot of variables at play here and I don't know the whole picture. What do I know is: you are not acting normal.
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,735
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,746
@1,195,695 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
why tho?
what makes you conclude mania? i do have a therapist i see regularly who weighs in professionally on all of these kinds of concerns and meets me in person.
which i have had to state in defense of prior accusations which have remained consistently repeated against me which i have also pointed out and have never been given ANY explanation beyond merely expressing the worry nebulously, and again i question kooks sincerity question the logic underpinning her assertions, satirize her motivations, and suddenly
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
and it follows:
@1,195,691 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
>
>
> Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
and 4 hours earlier in the first paragraph i said:
her argument methodology is to, "use deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)."
and all this worry stems from being convinced kook isn't under scrutiny, no, i have mental conditions, specific symptoms am improperly medicated, or dangerously self medicating, which i speak directly towards, have legitimate qualified professionals from which to make factual truth based statements about and request more specifically what precisely engenders concern, so that i can understand and speak to those actionable details. vague unexplainable pearl clutching doesn't help me deal with concerns that can't be identified as anything i have any control over
but kook sure does have some idiotic conclusions to draw correlations between - and i get it, being on board the bandwagon is not the same thing as driving the bandwagon. don't sweat it. my whole family is thick with bipolar relatives and malignant narcissism and i am quite familiar with gaslighting, emotional abuse and tactics used to manipulate the narrative, divide individuals, sow distrust, mobilize people against each other and make it look like everyone they target are the ones with the problems. that's like, literally one of the hallmark features of gaslighting and classic traits of narcissism. like the inability to ever admit they are in the wrong and refuse to apologise when they are.
my dad was married 50 years ago, divorced after having 3 kids, then remarried to my mom. and his first three kids are bipolar, one of them ha conduct disorder in the 70s. antisocial personality is what the army called him. their mom was insane, which is why my dad left her. i had depression as an informal diagnosis by my medical doctor, and formally anxiety when i was 17 - i know why, and my little brother has never been diagnosed with anything but being an asshole. otherwise no history of anything except stress, and i'm being evaluated by WPATH guidelines and have been for months to be evaluated for gender dysphoria. i was briefly medicated for PTSD from spending a year incredibly ill due to malpractice and failing to provide the minimum standard of care - so believe me, every doctor i've seen since may 2019, which was every doctor from dermatology, neurology, cardiology gastroenterology, endocrinology, psychology, and i've undergone every kind of -oscopy there's a hole for, and i've been scanned and evaluated had my blood drawn literally yesterday for the 9th series of routine test sive had this year which is 100% done to monitor properly maintained long term levels of medication, to confirm how my body responds remains in-line with the range set by the world professional association for trans health, AND to confirm no latent infection or resurgence of disease which happens to be monitored by the CDC through the county health department as meningitis and things of that nature are required to be, and yes, i am an addict, which means i have had to deal with that in the past, and i admit i will always be an addict -as they say- which is known to my family, everyone of my friends, all of my doctors, even my legal representatives have a comprehensive, entirely thorough complete record of going back 5 years, as texas law requires.
do i need to be any clearer?
i have been struggling to find employment in my area of expertise where i didn't before i transitioned, so it seems to be that assumptions based on nothing i can control, other peoples bigoted conclusions about transgenders - and nothing specific to me as an individual effects my employment certainly nothing to do with "sexualized images" which, look at them, i can walk down the street wearing flip flops and swim trunks LIKE A MAN because it's only the characterizations
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
like THIS that anything could be based on. not legally, medically or in the opinion of anyone who's even picked up the phone to call me, which kook has lied about intending on doing, and not one word. not one email. not one single time has she taken me up on my offer to shut her cunt mouth and listen did she even try.
and, i'm sorry, i shouldn't have used that language, that's not going to help me seem "balanced." but this had been non stop, ongoing, persistent and multiple people have brought it up directly to kook
@1,195,494 (H)
> > You said he is honest and he isnt
>
> You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
>
> You have issues
@1,195,495 (H)
> kook is like those people who find the most pedantic reasons to hate on a person like “oh look there aren’t any pictures in their room that means they are empty and suffering depression”
>
> Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
before i even knew there was anything to reply to for 12 hours. it was observed and addressed separately from me, i didn't level baseless accusations immediately followed by identical accusations that no one can seem to pin to anything except kook has been gaslighting me over these lies she asserts are true AND explain how it stems from deviant behavior over dissenting opinions.
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
meta, i disagree with her and she is NOW qualifying things with "seem like" because she is literally worried that she has legal exposure because it's true, she is libeling me, purposefully, and gaslighting so other people join her in attempting to harm my reputation, threaten me, and believes i have cause to go after her money. i implied as much, without ever saying anything , just asking her to be real specific and not gloss over details. and she continues to not stop.
even though i very likely could just keep my mouth shut and let her fuck up until she takes it to the point where it's legally actionable. because im worried for brie, that she isn't clever enough to avoid her worst impulses. but i'll keep saying, she can just stop. at any time. and keep. her smart ass mouth. to her fucking self. she's wealthy, and does what, spend all day calling people on the internet creepy sexual deviants that disgust her?
i'm telling you meta, she's god damned LUCKY that desite every hardship from drug addiction to unemployment and systemic discrimination, assault, medical negligence from people who wouldn't piss on me if i was on fire --that THIS creepy, disgusting deviant pervert she insists i am to her has kept my principles intact, maintained my honor and isn't a garbage human married into enough wealth to go enjoy being a rich person, the fuck she doing except hating on people she decides are beneath her. i'm telling you, she picked the wrong person this time. and i WILL let her destroy herself. like i said, she can stop any time or she can continue to be wrong. it can only get worse for her. i promise. much smarter people than her chose to stop, and walk away. and that is the absolute truth, and it doesn't matter that anyone take my word on that. i am confident that i am more than capable of maliciousness, understand all of this is me stomping around like frankenstein and acting like a monster, growling invitations to specifically say the words that she qualified because i telegraphed "my plot" like a cartoon villain
all i have to do is stop. which i will. right now. and she can too. she's welcome to. and no apology required. she just has to not be vile.
right now, there's a fork in the road, and i am done helping her navigate her dumb ass around perilous cliffs that she would feel better from steering me over, how quickly would she dishonor my memory and calling me a man, and he, and saying i was no real scot. just a creepy dude in a dress grossing her out and oversexualizing everything and subjecting her to perversion and blah blah blah.
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,679 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,641 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,638 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,635 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,633 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,626 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,485 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,463 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
tht right there is, just, alllllll daaayyyyyy long. instance after instance of her unhealthy preoccupation with calling everything deviant and constantly sexualizing everything in terms of assault and the people as disgusting.
worry about kook. not because i insist, but because you can see endless examples of her behavior and all that she can do is CLAIM i seem to be bpd and manic. but not show HOW. or where. but that i constantly do things for sicko reasons, generally, not flag the actual instance she references.
but, u know, you can believe whatever. i am the only one not tiptoeing through eggshells and that's because i'm quite comfortable with honesty. anything that can be shown to be true is absolutely not a libelous claim. only if it's a lie - a believably realistic deliberately false statement, so as to make people believe it for the purpose of causing harm. framing someone with lies so everyone attacks them and ruin them.
you know what isn't libel? telling you that kook is a liar, spreading demonstrably false accusations to hurt my reputation, shame and embarrass me publicly and she deserves to be exposed and live with the kind of shame a millionaire who kicks homeless people's teeth in for lulz should.
what would you do in the same position? cause i'll just say, the best idea she has for living life -unfettered from restraint, is to spend it on minichan, comparing svet to a gorilla that only partially human, harms real women with lies and is dishonest after complimenting my attractiveness, AND implying women don't act like me like i never used to have direct experience with how women are with men -because she's not making real any kind of contribution to anything. she's just cutting, and hacking and slashing away and telling everyone to grab a knife and whatever lies it takes to see them cut down like a wolf who kills livestock. a predatory hunter, killing without regard for the killed.
now who does that sound like? not u. not me. not really anyone, except maybe that sounds like...?
(sorry, my folks took me to dinner, and i'm meeting my sister for drinks up north with her work circle. hopefully it leads to employment and and i'll do something with y life other than write giant essays explaining myself to you jerkoffs just so i can defend myself against accusations of deviancy without getting harassed for it. you know?
kook can't explain herself beyond telling everyone she's right and then insults people and compel others to join her is the harassment.
i just want to stop being attacked and ridiculed, and harassed for defending my character.
so, meta, you do whatever you want. if you think ignoring what's happening and pretending it's not effecting me is what a man would do when, no joking they are REALLY worried about a woman living their true selves you want for them and you're happy for because you believe i have a right to exist... but you will only accept your concerns for and if i don't want YOUR concern you'll give me indifference and it won't matter what happens to me?
because no, meta, i dont' want your misplaced refusal to understand MY concerns about MY life if what you're offering is to tell me your understanding of my life which you find concerning in the same way i could say i'm concerned about some fictitious thing i believe about you, like, that you're delusional and that's affected your ability to attach with people in real life and i'm worried REALLY worried about... no specific outcome or situation i can articulate...
are you worried because i feel i have to explain so much and in greater and greater detail, look, meta - i tried saying i'm fine. no worries. and no one bothered to find out when i offered to let them, but i have to keep doing this over and over and over and over.
but i'f you're worried and capital REALLY worried
[email protected] hmu i'll send you my number and you can talk to me.
kook doesn't even give enough of a shit to real anything before announcing how irrelevant it is to even try.
because she's, by far, the most fucked in the head person and always has been.
but, whatever, i gotta go, hmu tomorrow and you can be as concerned as you want. and if not, whatever. i have provided a detailed roadmap of her through her process of destroying innocent people who simply expect everyone is responsible for their own mistakes, and agree when they're shown to be wrong, that they were wrong.
ttyl
why tho?
what makes you conclude mania? i do have a therapist i see regularly who weighs in professionally on all of these kinds of concerns and meets me in person.
which i have had to state in defense of prior accusations which have remained consistently repeated against me which i have also pointed out and have never been given ANY explanation beyond merely expressing the worry nebulously, and again i question kooks sincerity question the logic underpinning her assertions, satirize her motivations, and suddenly
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
and it follows:
@1,195,691 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
>
>
> Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
and 4 hours earlier in the first paragraph i said:
her argument methodology is to, "use deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)."
and all this worry stems from being convinced kook isn't under scrutiny, no, i have mental conditions, specific symptoms am improperly medicated, or dangerously self medicating, which i speak directly towards, have legitimate qualified professionals from which to make factual truth based statements about and request more specifically what precisely engenders concern, so that i can understand and speak to those actionable details. vague unexplainable pearl clutching doesn't help me deal with concerns that can't be identified as anything i have any control over
but kook sure does have some idiotic conclusions to draw correlations between - and i get it, being on board the bandwagon is not the same thing as driving the bandwagon. don't sweat it. my whole family is thick with bipolar relatives and malignant narcissism and i am quite familiar with gaslighting, emotional abuse and tactics used to manipulate the narrative, divide individuals, sow distrust, mobilize people against each other and make it look like everyone they target are the ones with the problems. that's like, literally one of the hallmark features of gaslighting and classic traits of narcissism. like the inability to ever admit they are in the wrong and refuse to apologise when they are.
my dad was married 50 years ago, divorced after having 3 kids, then remarried to my mom. and his first three kids are bipolar, one of them ha conduct disorder in the 70s. antisocial personality is what the army called him. their mom was insane, which is why my dad left her. i had depression as an informal diagnosis by my medical doctor, and formally anxiety when i was 17 - i know why, and my little brother has never been diagnosed with anything but being an asshole. otherwise no history of anything except stress, and i'm being evaluated by WPATH guidelines and have been for months to be evaluated for gender dysphoria. i was briefly medicated for PTSD from spending a year incredibly ill due to malpractice and failing to provide the minimum standard of care - so believe me, every doctor i've seen since may 2019, which was every doctor from dermatology, neurology, cardiology gastroenterology, endocrinology, psychology, and i've undergone every kind of -oscopy there's a hole for, and i've been scanned and evaluated had my blood drawn literally yesterday for the 9th series of routine test sive had this year which is 100% done to monitor properly maintained long term levels of medication, to confirm how my body responds remains in-line with the range set by the world professional association for trans health, AND to confirm no latent infection or resurgence of disease which happens to be monitored by the CDC through the county health department as meningitis and things of that nature are required to be, and yes, i am an addict, which means i have had to deal with that in the past, and i admit i will always be an addict -as they say- which is known to my family, everyone of my friends, all of my doctors, even my legal representatives have a comprehensive, entirely thorough complete record of going back 5 years, as texas law requires.
do i need to be any clearer?
i have been struggling to find employment in my area of expertise where i didn't before i transitioned, so it seems to be that assumptions based on nothing i can control, other peoples bigoted conclusions about transgenders - and nothing specific to me as an individual effects my employment certainly nothing to do with "sexualized images" which, look at them, i can walk down the street wearing flip flops and swim trunks LIKE A MAN because it's only the characterizations
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
like THIS that anything could be based on. not legally, medically or in the opinion of anyone who's even picked up the phone to call me, which kook has lied about intending on doing, and not one word. not one email. not one single time has she taken me up on my offer to shut her cunt mouth and listen did she even try.
and, i'm sorry, i shouldn't have used that language, that's not going to help me seem "balanced." but this had been non stop, ongoing, persistent and multiple people have brought it up directly to kook
@1,195,494 (H)
> > You said he is honest and he isnt
>
> You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
>
> You have issues
@1,195,495 (H)
> kook is like those people who find the most pedantic reasons to hate on a person like “oh look there aren’t any pictures in their room that means they are empty and suffering depression”
>
> Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
before i even knew there was anything to reply to for 12 hours. it was observed and addressed separately from me, i didn't level baseless accusations immediately followed by identical accusations that no one can seem to pin to anything except kook has been gaslighting me over these lies she asserts are true AND explain how it stems from deviant behavior over dissenting opinions.
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You seem like you're manic and have bpd
>
> And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
meta, i disagree with her and she is NOW qualifying things with "seem like" because she is literally worried that she has legal exposure because it's true, she is libeling me, purposefully, and gaslighting so other people join her in attempting to harm my reputation, threaten me, and believes i have cause to go after her money. i implied as much, without ever saying anything , just asking her to be real specific and not gloss over details. and she continues to not stop.
even though i very likely could just keep my mouth shut and let her fuck up until she takes it to the point where it's legally actionable. because im worried for brie, that she isn't clever enough to avoid her worst impulses. but i'll keep saying, she can just stop. at any time. and keep. her smart ass mouth. to her fucking self. she's wealthy, and does what, spend all day calling people on the internet creepy sexual deviants that disgust her?
i'm telling you meta, she's god damned LUCKY that desite every hardship from drug addiction to unemployment and systemic discrimination, assault, medical negligence from people who wouldn't piss on me if i was on fire --that THIS creepy, disgusting deviant pervert she insists i am to her has kept my principles intact, maintained my honor and isn't a garbage human married into enough wealth to go enjoy being a rich person, the fuck she doing except hating on people she decides are beneath her. i'm telling you, she picked the wrong person this time. and i WILL let her destroy herself. like i said, she can stop any time or she can continue to be wrong. it can only get worse for her. i promise. much smarter people than her chose to stop, and walk away. and that is the absolute truth, and it doesn't matter that anyone take my word on that. i am confident that i am more than capable of maliciousness, understand all of this is me stomping around like frankenstein and acting like a monster, growling invitations to specifically say the words that she qualified because i telegraphed "my plot" like a cartoon villain
all i have to do is stop. which i will. right now. and she can too. she's welcome to. and no apology required. she just has to not be vile.
right now, there's a fork in the road, and i am done helping her navigate her dumb ass around perilous cliffs that she would feel better from steering me over, how quickly would she dishonor my memory and calling me a man, and he, and saying i was no real scot. just a creepy dude in a dress grossing her out and oversexualizing everything and subjecting her to perversion and blah blah blah.
@1,195,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,679 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,646 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,641 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,638 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,635 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,633 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,626 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,485 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,467 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,195,463 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
tht right there is, just, alllllll daaayyyyyy long. instance after instance of her unhealthy preoccupation with calling everything deviant and constantly sexualizing everything in terms of assault and the people as disgusting.
worry about kook. not because i insist, but because you can see endless examples of her behavior and all that she can do is CLAIM i seem to be bpd and manic. but not show HOW. or where. but that i constantly do things for sicko reasons, generally, not flag the actual instance she references.
but, u know, you can believe whatever. i am the only one not tiptoeing through eggshells and that's because i'm quite comfortable with honesty. anything that can be shown to be true is absolutely not a libelous claim. only if it's a lie - a believably realistic deliberately false statement, so as to make people believe it for the purpose of causing harm. framing someone with lies so everyone attacks them and ruin them.
you know what isn't libel? telling you that kook is a liar, spreading demonstrably false accusations to hurt my reputation, shame and embarrass me publicly and she deserves to be exposed and live with the kind of shame a millionaire who kicks homeless people's teeth in for lulz should.
what would you do in the same position? cause i'll just say, the best idea she has for living life -unfettered from restraint, is to spend it on minichan, comparing svet to a gorilla that only partially human, harms real women with lies and is dishonest after complimenting my attractiveness, AND implying women don't act like me like i never used to have direct experience with how women are with men -because she's not making real any kind of contribution to anything. she's just cutting, and hacking and slashing away and telling everyone to grab a knife and whatever lies it takes to see them cut down like a wolf who kills livestock. a predatory hunter, killing without regard for the killed.
now who does that sound like? not u. not me. not really anyone, except maybe that sounds like...?
(sorry, my folks took me to dinner, and i'm meeting my sister for drinks up north with her work circle. hopefully it leads to employment and and i'll do something with y life other than write giant essays explaining myself to you jerkoffs just so i can defend myself against accusations of deviancy without getting harassed for it. you know?
kook can't explain herself beyond telling everyone she's right and then insults people and compel others to join her is the harassment.
i just want to stop being attacked and ridiculed, and harassed for defending my character.
so, meta, you do whatever you want. if you think ignoring what's happening and pretending it's not effecting me is what a man would do when, no joking they are REALLY worried about a woman living their true selves you want for them and you're happy for because you believe i have a right to exist... but you will only accept your concerns for and if i don't want YOUR concern you'll give me indifference and it won't matter what happens to me?
because no, meta, i dont' want your misplaced refusal to understand MY concerns about MY life if what you're offering is to tell me your understanding of my life which you find concerning in the same way i could say i'm concerned about some fictitious thing i believe about you, like, that you're delusional and that's affected your ability to attach with people in real life and i'm worried REALLY worried about... no specific outcome or situation i can articulate...
are you worried because i feel i have to explain so much and in greater and greater detail, look, meta - i tried saying i'm fine. no worries. and no one bothered to find out when i offered to let them, but i have to keep doing this over and over and over and over.
but i'f you're worried and capital REALLY worried
[email protected] hmu i'll send you my number and you can talk to me.
kook doesn't even give enough of a shit to real anything before announcing how irrelevant it is to even try.
because she's, by far, the most fucked in the head person and always has been.
but, whatever, i gotta go, hmu tomorrow and you can be as concerned as you want. and if not, whatever. i have provided a detailed roadmap of her through her process of destroying innocent people who simply expect everyone is responsible for their own mistakes, and agree when they're shown to be wrong, that they were wrong.
ttyl
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,747
@1,195,697 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
how am i not acting normal, dude? you're really worried i'm on drugs, but you don't know why or have any suspicions.
specifics, meta. how am i not acting normal? stop with the fucking generalities that explain nothing but that you are concerned for no reason
how am i not acting normal, dude? you're really worried i'm on drugs, but you don't know why or have any suspicions.
specifics, meta. how am i not acting normal? stop with the fucking generalities that explain nothing but that you are concerned for no reason
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,748
@1,195,746 (❤ Harlot ❤)
I am 100% not worried about legal exposure. Find me and sue me bitch. I'd love to see how a jury reacts to you
Also you sound like Autophag now
I am 100% not worried about legal exposure. Find me and sue me bitch. I'd love to see how a jury reacts to you
Also you sound like Autophag now
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 50 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,749
what do you want me to explain about myself to you that you will believe?
because i really don't get the impression that you're concerned seeing as how you can't even tell me why.
i think it's because you're bought in to the bandwagon repetitive claims - that are baselessly explained to you, and that having hear over and over the same general fears expressed perpetually you think i have a problem. and that the preoccupation some have with labeling me to be deviant aren't the ones who need help. again, i would love to have it explained to me where it doesn't rely on some lie kook is spreading about me. it's not odd that i was well liked, then came back trans and now kook has everyone thinking i have problems that no one can explain except kook who lies.
bye
because i really don't get the impression that you're concerned seeing as how you can't even tell me why.
i think it's because you're bought in to the bandwagon repetitive claims - that are baselessly explained to you, and that having hear over and over the same general fears expressed perpetually you think i have a problem. and that the preoccupation some have with labeling me to be deviant aren't the ones who need help. again, i would love to have it explained to me where it doesn't rely on some lie kook is spreading about me. it's not odd that i was well liked, then came back trans and now kook has everyone thinking i have problems that no one can explain except kook who lies.
bye
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,750
what do you want me to explain about myself to you that you will believe?
because i really don't get the impression that you're concerned seeing as how you can't even tell me why.
i think it's because you're bought in to the bandwagon repetitive claims - that are baselessly explained to you, and that having hear over and over the same general fears expressed perpetually you think i have a problem. and that the preoccupation some have with labeling me to be deviant aren't the ones who need help. again, i would love to have it explained to me where it doesn't rely on some lie kook is spreading about me. it's not odd that i was well liked, then came back trans and now kook has everyone thinking i have problems that no one can explain except kook who lies.
bye
because i really don't get the impression that you're concerned seeing as how you can't even tell me why.
i think it's because you're bought in to the bandwagon repetitive claims - that are baselessly explained to you, and that having hear over and over the same general fears expressed perpetually you think i have a problem. and that the preoccupation some have with labeling me to be deviant aren't the ones who need help. again, i would love to have it explained to me where it doesn't rely on some lie kook is spreading about me. it's not odd that i was well liked, then came back trans and now kook has everyone thinking i have problems that no one can explain except kook who lies.
bye
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 46 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,751
@1,195,746 (❤ Harlot ❤)
> why tho?
>
> what makes you conclude mania? i do have a therapist i see regularly who weighs in professionally on all of these kinds of concerns and meets me in person.
>
> which i have had to state in defense of prior accusations which have remained consistently repeated against me which i have also pointed out and have never been given ANY explanation beyond merely expressing the worry nebulously, and again i question kooks sincerity question the logic underpinning her assertions, satirize her motivations, and suddenly
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> and it follows:
>
>
>
> > You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
> >
> >
> > Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
>
> and 4 hours earlier in the first paragraph i said:
> her argument methodology is to, "use deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)."
>
> and all this worry stems from being convinced kook isn't under scrutiny, no, i have mental conditions, specific symptoms am improperly medicated, or dangerously self medicating, which i speak directly towards, have legitimate qualified professionals from which to make factual truth based statements about and request more specifically what precisely engenders concern, so that i can understand and speak to those actionable details. vague unexplainable pearl clutching doesn't help me deal with concerns that can't be identified as anything i have any control over
>
> but kook sure does have some idiotic conclusions to draw correlations between - and i get it, being on board the bandwagon is not the same thing as driving the bandwagon. don't sweat it. my whole family is thick with bipolar relatives and malignant narcissism and i am quite familiar with gaslighting, emotional abuse and tactics used to manipulate the narrative, divide individuals, sow distrust, mobilize people against each other and make it look like everyone they target are the ones with the problems. that's like, literally one of the hallmark features of gaslighting and classic traits of narcissism. like the inability to ever admit they are in the wrong and refuse to apologise when they are.
>
> my dad was married 50 years ago, divorced after having 3 kids, then remarried to my mom. and his first three kids are bipolar, one of them ha conduct disorder in the 70s. antisocial personality is what the army called him. their mom was insane, which is why my dad left her. i had depression as an informal diagnosis by my medical doctor, and formally anxiety when i was 17 - i know why, and my little brother has never been diagnosed with anything but being an asshole. otherwise no history of anything except stress, and i'm being evaluated by WPATH guidelines and have been for months to be evaluated for gender dysphoria. i was briefly medicated for PTSD from spending a year incredibly ill due to malpractice and failing to provide the minimum standard of care - so believe me, every doctor i've seen since may 2019, which was every doctor from dermatology, neurology, cardiology gastroenterology, endocrinology, psychology, and i've undergone every kind of -oscopy there's a hole for, and i've been scanned and evaluated had my blood drawn literally yesterday for the 9th series of routine test sive had this year which is 100% done to monitor properly maintained long term levels of medication, to confirm how my body responds remains in-line with the range set by the world professional association for trans health, AND to confirm no latent infection or resurgence of disease which happens to be monitored by the CDC through the county health department as meningitis and things of that nature are required to be, and yes, i am an addict, which means i have had to deal with that in the past, and i admit i will always be an addict -as they say- which is known to my family, everyone of my friends, all of my doctors, even my legal representatives have a comprehensive, entirely thorough complete record of going back 5 years, as texas law requires.
> do i need to be any clearer?
> i have been struggling to find employment in my area of expertise where i didn't before i transitioned, so it seems to be that assumptions based on nothing i can control, other peoples bigoted conclusions about transgenders - and nothing specific to me as an individual effects my employment certainly nothing to do with "sexualized images" which, look at them, i can walk down the street wearing flip flops and swim trunks LIKE A MAN because it's only the characterizations
>
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> like THIS that anything could be based on. not legally, medically or in the opinion of anyone who's even picked up the phone to call me, which kook has lied about intending on doing, and not one word. not one email. not one single time has she taken me up on my offer to shut her cunt mouth and listen did she even try.
>
> and, i'm sorry, i shouldn't have used that language, that's not going to help me seem "balanced." but this had been non stop, ongoing, persistent and multiple people have brought it up directly to kook
>
>
>
> > > You said he is honest and he isnt
> >
> > You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
> >
> > You have issues
>
>
>
> > kook is like those people who find the most pedantic reasons to hate on a person like “oh look there aren’t any pictures in their room that means they are empty and suffering depression”
> >
> > Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
>
> before i even knew there was anything to reply to for 12 hours. it was observed and addressed separately from me, i didn't level baseless accusations immediately followed by identical accusations that no one can seem to pin to anything except kook has been gaslighting me over these lies she asserts are true AND explain how it stems from deviant behavior over dissenting opinions.
>
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> meta, i disagree with her and she is NOW qualifying things with "seem like" because she is literally worried that she has legal exposure because it's true, she is libeling me, purposefully, and gaslighting so other people join her in attempting to harm my reputation, threaten me, and believes i have cause to go after her money. i implied as much, without ever saying anything , just asking her to be real specific and not gloss over details. and she continues to not stop.
>
> even though i very likely could just keep my mouth shut and let her fuck up until she takes it to the point where it's legally actionable. because im worried for brie, that she isn't clever enough to avoid her worst impulses. but i'll keep saying, she can just stop. at any time. and keep. her smart ass mouth. to her fucking self. she's wealthy, and does what, spend all day calling people on the internet creepy sexual deviants that disgust her?
>
> i'm telling you meta, she's god damned LUCKY that desite every hardship from drug addiction to unemployment and systemic discrimination, assault, medical negligence from people who wouldn't piss on me if i was on fire --that THIS creepy, disgusting deviant pervert she insists i am to her has kept my principles intact, maintained my honor and isn't a garbage human married into enough wealth to go enjoy being a rich person, the fuck she doing except hating on people she decides are beneath her. i'm telling you, she picked the wrong person this time. and i WILL let her destroy herself. like i said, she can stop any time or she can continue to be wrong. it can only get worse for her. i promise. much smarter people than her chose to stop, and walk away. and that is the absolute truth, and it doesn't matter that anyone take my word on that. i am confident that i am more than capable of maliciousness, understand all of this is me stomping around like frankenstein and acting like a monster, growling invitations to specifically say the words that she qualified because i telegraphed "my plot" like a cartoon villain
>
> all i have to do is stop. which i will. right now. and she can too. she's welcome to. and no apology required. she just has to not be vile.
> right now, there's a fork in the road, and i am done helping her navigate her dumb ass around perilous cliffs that she would feel better from steering me over, how quickly would she dishonor my memory and calling me a man, and he, and saying i was no real scot. just a creepy dude in a dress grossing her out and oversexualizing everything and subjecting her to perversion and blah blah blah.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> tht right there is, just, alllllll daaayyyyyy long. instance after instance of her unhealthy preoccupation with calling everything deviant and constantly sexualizing everything in terms of assault and the people as disgusting.
>
> worry about kook. not because i insist, but because you can see endless examples of her behavior and all that she can do is CLAIM i seem to be bpd and manic. but not show HOW. or where. but that i constantly do things for sicko reasons, generally, not flag the actual instance she references.
>
> but, u know, you can believe whatever. i am the only one not tiptoeing through eggshells and that's because i'm quite comfortable with honesty. anything that can be shown to be true is absolutely not a libelous claim. only if it's a lie - a believably realistic deliberately false statement, so as to make people believe it for the purpose of causing harm. framing someone with lies so everyone attacks them and ruin them.
>
> you know what isn't libel? telling you that kook is a liar, spreading demonstrably false accusations to hurt my reputation, shame and embarrass me publicly and she deserves to be exposed and live with the kind of shame a millionaire who kicks homeless people's teeth in for lulz should.
>
> what would you do in the same position? cause i'll just say, the best idea she has for living life -unfettered from restraint, is to spend it on minichan, comparing svet to a gorilla that only partially human, harms real women with lies and is dishonest after complimenting my attractiveness, AND implying women don't act like me like i never used to have direct experience with how women are with men -because she's not making real any kind of contribution to anything. she's just cutting, and hacking and slashing away and telling everyone to grab a knife and whatever lies it takes to see them cut down like a wolf who kills livestock. a predatory hunter, killing without regard for the killed.
> now who does that sound like? not u. not me. not really anyone, except maybe that sounds like...?
>
> (sorry, my folks took me to dinner, and i'm meeting my sister for drinks up north with her work circle. hopefully it leads to employment and and i'll do something with y life other than write giant essays explaining myself to you jerkoffs just so i can defend myself against accusations of deviancy without getting harassed for it. you know?
>
> kook can't explain herself beyond telling everyone she's right and then insults people and compel others to join her is the harassment.
>
> i just want to stop being attacked and ridiculed, and harassed for defending my character.
>
> so, meta, you do whatever you want. if you think ignoring what's happening and pretending it's not effecting me is what a man would do when, no joking they are REALLY worried about a woman living their true selves you want for them and you're happy for because you believe i have a right to exist... but you will only accept your concerns for and if i don't want YOUR concern you'll give me indifference and it won't matter what happens to me?
>
> because no, meta, i dont' want your misplaced refusal to understand MY concerns about MY life if what you're offering is to tell me your understanding of my life which you find concerning in the same way i could say i'm concerned about some fictitious thing i believe about you, like, that you're delusional and that's affected your ability to attach with people in real life and i'm worried REALLY worried about... no specific outcome or situation i can articulate...
>
> are you worried because i feel i have to explain so much and in greater and greater detail, look, meta - i tried saying i'm fine. no worries. and no one bothered to find out when i offered to let them, but i have to keep doing this over and over and over and over.
>
> but i'f you're worried and capital REALLY worried
> [email protected] hmu i'll send you my number and you can talk to me.
> kook doesn't even give enough of a shit to real anything before announcing how irrelevant it is to even try.
>
> because she's, by far, the most fucked in the head person and always has been.
>
> but, whatever, i gotta go, hmu tomorrow and you can be as concerned as you want. and if not, whatever. i have provided a detailed roadmap of her through her process of destroying innocent people who simply expect everyone is responsible for their own mistakes, and agree when they're shown to be wrong, that they were wrong.
>
> ttyl
Fruitcake.
> why tho?
>
> what makes you conclude mania? i do have a therapist i see regularly who weighs in professionally on all of these kinds of concerns and meets me in person.
>
> which i have had to state in defense of prior accusations which have remained consistently repeated against me which i have also pointed out and have never been given ANY explanation beyond merely expressing the worry nebulously, and again i question kooks sincerity question the logic underpinning her assertions, satirize her motivations, and suddenly
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> and it follows:
>
>
>
> > You seem really manic and unhappy right now.
> >
> >
> > Okay. I, Meta, am truly concerned about you, Harlot. I am worried that you are experiencing a manic episode and/or you have been taking a lot of drugs. I can't be any clearer than that.
>
> and 4 hours earlier in the first paragraph i said:
> her argument methodology is to, "use deliberate insincerity to rest on incredulity to falsely UN-correlate herself from criticism by way of denying causation and ultimately perpetuate bandwagon support against individuals with ad-hominems which is all already being setup here @1,195,463, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,473, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,485, (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) here @1,195,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) and here @1,195,497 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)."
>
> and all this worry stems from being convinced kook isn't under scrutiny, no, i have mental conditions, specific symptoms am improperly medicated, or dangerously self medicating, which i speak directly towards, have legitimate qualified professionals from which to make factual truth based statements about and request more specifically what precisely engenders concern, so that i can understand and speak to those actionable details. vague unexplainable pearl clutching doesn't help me deal with concerns that can't be identified as anything i have any control over
>
> but kook sure does have some idiotic conclusions to draw correlations between - and i get it, being on board the bandwagon is not the same thing as driving the bandwagon. don't sweat it. my whole family is thick with bipolar relatives and malignant narcissism and i am quite familiar with gaslighting, emotional abuse and tactics used to manipulate the narrative, divide individuals, sow distrust, mobilize people against each other and make it look like everyone they target are the ones with the problems. that's like, literally one of the hallmark features of gaslighting and classic traits of narcissism. like the inability to ever admit they are in the wrong and refuse to apologise when they are.
>
> my dad was married 50 years ago, divorced after having 3 kids, then remarried to my mom. and his first three kids are bipolar, one of them ha conduct disorder in the 70s. antisocial personality is what the army called him. their mom was insane, which is why my dad left her. i had depression as an informal diagnosis by my medical doctor, and formally anxiety when i was 17 - i know why, and my little brother has never been diagnosed with anything but being an asshole. otherwise no history of anything except stress, and i'm being evaluated by WPATH guidelines and have been for months to be evaluated for gender dysphoria. i was briefly medicated for PTSD from spending a year incredibly ill due to malpractice and failing to provide the minimum standard of care - so believe me, every doctor i've seen since may 2019, which was every doctor from dermatology, neurology, cardiology gastroenterology, endocrinology, psychology, and i've undergone every kind of -oscopy there's a hole for, and i've been scanned and evaluated had my blood drawn literally yesterday for the 9th series of routine test sive had this year which is 100% done to monitor properly maintained long term levels of medication, to confirm how my body responds remains in-line with the range set by the world professional association for trans health, AND to confirm no latent infection or resurgence of disease which happens to be monitored by the CDC through the county health department as meningitis and things of that nature are required to be, and yes, i am an addict, which means i have had to deal with that in the past, and i admit i will always be an addict -as they say- which is known to my family, everyone of my friends, all of my doctors, even my legal representatives have a comprehensive, entirely thorough complete record of going back 5 years, as texas law requires.
> do i need to be any clearer?
> i have been struggling to find employment in my area of expertise where i didn't before i transitioned, so it seems to be that assumptions based on nothing i can control, other peoples bigoted conclusions about transgenders - and nothing specific to me as an individual effects my employment certainly nothing to do with "sexualized images" which, look at them, i can walk down the street wearing flip flops and swim trunks LIKE A MAN because it's only the characterizations
>
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> like THIS that anything could be based on. not legally, medically or in the opinion of anyone who's even picked up the phone to call me, which kook has lied about intending on doing, and not one word. not one email. not one single time has she taken me up on my offer to shut her cunt mouth and listen did she even try.
>
> and, i'm sorry, i shouldn't have used that language, that's not going to help me seem "balanced." but this had been non stop, ongoing, persistent and multiple people have brought it up directly to kook
>
>
>
> > > You said he is honest and he isnt
> >
> > You just look for anything to attack squeegee on it’s hilarious. Squeegee just said that Svet had big balls for complimenting her and you started attacking her
> >
> > You have issues
>
>
>
> > kook is like those people who find the most pedantic reasons to hate on a person like “oh look there aren’t any pictures in their room that means they are empty and suffering depression”
> >
> > Stop treating every discussion like it’s part of a giant universe of facts. Saying someone is honest doesn’t mean you need to dredge up the complete history of that persons credibility. Start treating threads like an island of conversation rather than a dot in a complex matrix of “squeegee hatedom” and your brain won’t hurt as much
>
> before i even knew there was anything to reply to for 12 hours. it was observed and addressed separately from me, i didn't level baseless accusations immediately followed by identical accusations that no one can seem to pin to anything except kook has been gaslighting me over these lies she asserts are true AND explain how it stems from deviant behavior over dissenting opinions.
>
>
>
> > You seem like you're manic and have bpd
> >
> > And it is creepy to constantly sexualize things, and to post sexual images in response to any type of dissenting opinion
>
> meta, i disagree with her and she is NOW qualifying things with "seem like" because she is literally worried that she has legal exposure because it's true, she is libeling me, purposefully, and gaslighting so other people join her in attempting to harm my reputation, threaten me, and believes i have cause to go after her money. i implied as much, without ever saying anything , just asking her to be real specific and not gloss over details. and she continues to not stop.
>
> even though i very likely could just keep my mouth shut and let her fuck up until she takes it to the point where it's legally actionable. because im worried for brie, that she isn't clever enough to avoid her worst impulses. but i'll keep saying, she can just stop. at any time. and keep. her smart ass mouth. to her fucking self. she's wealthy, and does what, spend all day calling people on the internet creepy sexual deviants that disgust her?
>
> i'm telling you meta, she's god damned LUCKY that desite every hardship from drug addiction to unemployment and systemic discrimination, assault, medical negligence from people who wouldn't piss on me if i was on fire --that THIS creepy, disgusting deviant pervert she insists i am to her has kept my principles intact, maintained my honor and isn't a garbage human married into enough wealth to go enjoy being a rich person, the fuck she doing except hating on people she decides are beneath her. i'm telling you, she picked the wrong person this time. and i WILL let her destroy herself. like i said, she can stop any time or she can continue to be wrong. it can only get worse for her. i promise. much smarter people than her chose to stop, and walk away. and that is the absolute truth, and it doesn't matter that anyone take my word on that. i am confident that i am more than capable of maliciousness, understand all of this is me stomping around like frankenstein and acting like a monster, growling invitations to specifically say the words that she qualified because i telegraphed "my plot" like a cartoon villain
>
> all i have to do is stop. which i will. right now. and she can too. she's welcome to. and no apology required. she just has to not be vile.
> right now, there's a fork in the road, and i am done helping her navigate her dumb ass around perilous cliffs that she would feel better from steering me over, how quickly would she dishonor my memory and calling me a man, and he, and saying i was no real scot. just a creepy dude in a dress grossing her out and oversexualizing everything and subjecting her to perversion and blah blah blah.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> tht right there is, just, alllllll daaayyyyyy long. instance after instance of her unhealthy preoccupation with calling everything deviant and constantly sexualizing everything in terms of assault and the people as disgusting.
>
> worry about kook. not because i insist, but because you can see endless examples of her behavior and all that she can do is CLAIM i seem to be bpd and manic. but not show HOW. or where. but that i constantly do things for sicko reasons, generally, not flag the actual instance she references.
>
> but, u know, you can believe whatever. i am the only one not tiptoeing through eggshells and that's because i'm quite comfortable with honesty. anything that can be shown to be true is absolutely not a libelous claim. only if it's a lie - a believably realistic deliberately false statement, so as to make people believe it for the purpose of causing harm. framing someone with lies so everyone attacks them and ruin them.
>
> you know what isn't libel? telling you that kook is a liar, spreading demonstrably false accusations to hurt my reputation, shame and embarrass me publicly and she deserves to be exposed and live with the kind of shame a millionaire who kicks homeless people's teeth in for lulz should.
>
> what would you do in the same position? cause i'll just say, the best idea she has for living life -unfettered from restraint, is to spend it on minichan, comparing svet to a gorilla that only partially human, harms real women with lies and is dishonest after complimenting my attractiveness, AND implying women don't act like me like i never used to have direct experience with how women are with men -because she's not making real any kind of contribution to anything. she's just cutting, and hacking and slashing away and telling everyone to grab a knife and whatever lies it takes to see them cut down like a wolf who kills livestock. a predatory hunter, killing without regard for the killed.
> now who does that sound like? not u. not me. not really anyone, except maybe that sounds like...?
>
> (sorry, my folks took me to dinner, and i'm meeting my sister for drinks up north with her work circle. hopefully it leads to employment and and i'll do something with y life other than write giant essays explaining myself to you jerkoffs just so i can defend myself against accusations of deviancy without getting harassed for it. you know?
>
> kook can't explain herself beyond telling everyone she's right and then insults people and compel others to join her is the harassment.
>
> i just want to stop being attacked and ridiculed, and harassed for defending my character.
>
> so, meta, you do whatever you want. if you think ignoring what's happening and pretending it's not effecting me is what a man would do when, no joking they are REALLY worried about a woman living their true selves you want for them and you're happy for because you believe i have a right to exist... but you will only accept your concerns for and if i don't want YOUR concern you'll give me indifference and it won't matter what happens to me?
>
> because no, meta, i dont' want your misplaced refusal to understand MY concerns about MY life if what you're offering is to tell me your understanding of my life which you find concerning in the same way i could say i'm concerned about some fictitious thing i believe about you, like, that you're delusional and that's affected your ability to attach with people in real life and i'm worried REALLY worried about... no specific outcome or situation i can articulate...
>
> are you worried because i feel i have to explain so much and in greater and greater detail, look, meta - i tried saying i'm fine. no worries. and no one bothered to find out when i offered to let them, but i have to keep doing this over and over and over and over.
>
> but i'f you're worried and capital REALLY worried
> [email protected] hmu i'll send you my number and you can talk to me.
> kook doesn't even give enough of a shit to real anything before announcing how irrelevant it is to even try.
>
> because she's, by far, the most fucked in the head person and always has been.
>
> but, whatever, i gotta go, hmu tomorrow and you can be as concerned as you want. and if not, whatever. i have provided a detailed roadmap of her through her process of destroying innocent people who simply expect everyone is responsible for their own mistakes, and agree when they're shown to be wrong, that they were wrong.
>
> ttyl
Fruitcake.
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,753
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,754
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,756
@1,195,751 (O)
why? can you even explain why that one word applies to me or is your flippant incenserity self evident from your uselessness
why? can you even explain why that one word applies to me or is your flippant incenserity self evident from your uselessness
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,758
@1,195,754 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
oh, real brave and tough and sure of your self now aren't you. you transparent, vacant blimp
oh, real brave and tough and sure of your self now aren't you. you transparent, vacant blimp
❤ Harlot ❤ (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,759
@1,195,754 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
i know brie's last name i just wondered if you'd put up or are chicken shit.
i know brie's last name i just wondered if you'd put up or are chicken shit.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,760
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,761
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,768
@1,195,760 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Didn't you connect on Facebook? DID you use your home connection? Or phone app? I wouldn't count on hiding to protect you. I thought you were smarter than this.
Didn't you connect on Facebook? DID you use your home connection? Or phone app? I wouldn't count on hiding to protect you. I thought you were smarter than this.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,769
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,770
@1,195,761 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Lol. Kook, at least you have enough money you can afford a lawyer, you're the type who'll manage to need one. What you're doing, that's pretty dumb if you think you not just antagonizing. Maybe you know that and feel like you're safely Anonymous? That would be stupid. U must know something absolute, like exactly that you're legally in clear and aren't just claiming things.
Which actually would just be lying. Which would be stupid. To also be antagonizing.
Idk shit about getting sued.
I know I don't think you believe half of the things you say. But I did think you were smarter than. Reckless.
Lol. Kook, at least you have enough money you can afford a lawyer, you're the type who'll manage to need one. What you're doing, that's pretty dumb if you think you not just antagonizing. Maybe you know that and feel like you're safely Anonymous? That would be stupid. U must know something absolute, like exactly that you're legally in clear and aren't just claiming things.
Which actually would just be lying. Which would be stupid. To also be antagonizing.
Idk shit about getting sued.
I know I don't think you believe half of the things you say. But I did think you were smarter than. Reckless.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,771
@1,195,769 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It connect to devices that... u know what, you know what you're doing. I'm going to mind my own business.
It connect to devices that... u know what, you know what you're doing. I'm going to mind my own business.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,772
@1,195,770 (D)
Hey I can't stop anyone from suing me
What I do know is I have a clean background check and money to hire a private detective and good lawyers
The bar for a libel suit is very high. So "lying" about someone under their internet handle doesn't reach it. Sorry to disappoint
Hey I can't stop anyone from suing me
What I do know is I have a clean background check and money to hire a private detective and good lawyers
The bar for a libel suit is very high. So "lying" about someone under their internet handle doesn't reach it. Sorry to disappoint
LadyD !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,773
Doesn't libel require monetary loss as a result of whatever is supposed to be libel?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,774
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,775
Also threatening to sue over internet spats is beyond pathetic. Your behavior has been deeply unsettling and when other people notice you think it's because I'm influencing them
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,776
@1,195,772 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Haha. It is very high. You won't get sued. But why are you "lying" to everyone about squeegee? Just because you can get away with it?
Is squeegee on meth or not? I thought he was going to negi Springfield. I believe he's being trans now. Who sayd he's a tweaker?
Haha. It is very high. You won't get sued. But why are you "lying" to everyone about squeegee? Just because you can get away with it?
Is squeegee on meth or not? I thought he was going to negi Springfield. I believe he's being trans now. Who sayd he's a tweaker?
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,777
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,778
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,780
@1,195,776 (D)
What did I say Squeegee was a tweaker or that she seems to have mania? Did I use the word tweaker?
What did I say Squeegee was a tweaker or that she seems to have mania? Did I use the word tweaker?
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,781
@OP kook is annoying but you do seem wacked out when you post massive tl;dr walls of text talking about your dad being divorced and random stuff no one asked about
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,782
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,783
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Deadpool didn't use the word tweaker, why are you? Are you a tweaker?
I think Wade has admitted to being a former tweaker so they would be an expert in all things tweak
> Deadpool didn't use the word tweaker, why are you? Are you a tweaker?
I think Wade has admitted to being a former tweaker so they would be an expert in all things tweak
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,784
the time salts really did a number on squeegette I guess
see, time travel sounds fun but this is where u end up folks. not even once
see, time travel sounds fun but this is where u end up folks. not even once
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,785
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 29 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,787
@1,195,780 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Oh, God, I'm not touching that gay thread. But I've been thinking for a month squeegee is on meth. Someone said it, and it's general knowledge I thought.
Oh, God, I'm not touching that gay thread. But I've been thinking for a month squeegee is on meth. Someone said it, and it's general knowledge I thought.
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,788
@1,195,778 (D)
Does she do meth anymore? If not, no. I embody a lot of traits associated with "tweakers" and it's only minutly causes by my actual meth use, which was only a few months. It's mostly from my ADHD medication during my formative years.
Does she do meth anymore? If not, no. I embody a lot of traits associated with "tweakers" and it's only minutly causes by my actual meth use, which was only a few months. It's mostly from my ADHD medication during my formative years.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,789
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,790
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,791
@1,195,785 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> She could weigh in on if tweakers type like Squeegee does
TBF squeegees text although long winded is comprehensible she could just be overly verbose
I don’t remember pre Harlot squeegee that well but I don’t remember massive stream of conscious posts like she’s making now
> She could weigh in on if tweakers type like Squeegee does
TBF squeegees text although long winded is comprehensible she could just be overly verbose
I don’t remember pre Harlot squeegee that well but I don’t remember massive stream of conscious posts like she’s making now
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,792
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,793
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,794
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,795
@1,195,793 (LadyD !Pool..v42s)
> Why did you bring up being a tweaker or not in the first place then?
I didn’t it was Anon D I believe
> Why did you bring up being a tweaker or not in the first place then?
I didn’t it was Anon D I believe
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,796
@1,195,789 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I thought that's why meta had that whole concern trolling thing was because there was truth to the meth stuff.
I thought that's why meta had that whole concern trolling thing was because there was truth to the meth stuff.
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,798
@1,195,795 (H)
Sorry, I saw the post @1,195,787 (D)
Explaining where the tweaker possibility came from, I always confuse anons, and it's a problem.
Sorry, I saw the post @1,195,787 (D)
Explaining where the tweaker possibility came from, I always confuse anons, and it's a problem.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,799
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,801
@1,195,747 (❤ Harlot ❤)
> how am i not acting normal, dude? you're really worried i'm on drugs, but you don't know why or have any suspicions.
>
> specifics, meta. how am i not acting normal? stop with the fucking generalities that explain nothing but that you are concerned for no reason
you sound like a fucking psycho lmao
> how am i not acting normal, dude? you're really worried i'm on drugs, but you don't know why or have any suspicions.
>
> specifics, meta. how am i not acting normal? stop with the fucking generalities that explain nothing but that you are concerned for no reason
you sound like a fucking psycho lmao
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,803
@1,195,791 (H)
Endless kerbal space program posts no one cared about, that and world of Warcraft character backstories. And the elite dangerous game that is not out yet still.
I always figured he used voice to text cause, that'll get to crazy word counts. It seemed like sometimes he was just pointlessly writing. I don't remember anything particularly brief. Except first
Endless kerbal space program posts no one cared about, that and world of Warcraft character backstories. And the elite dangerous game that is not out yet still.
I always figured he used voice to text cause, that'll get to crazy word counts. It seemed like sometimes he was just pointlessly writing. I don't remember anything particularly brief. Except first
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,804
@1,195,799 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
My solution is to not read it. Then I have nothing to care about. Because I'm not helping him, so why worry
My solution is to not read it. Then I have nothing to care about. Because I'm not helping him, so why worry
Anonymous D triple-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,805
I guess it's funny that squeegee is fucked off and could use help and everyone just says, yea we know, and we're concerned about you. And good luck with that. Haha
Anonymous D quadruple-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,806
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,808
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,809
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,811
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,812
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,813
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,815
It is true that y'all are wealthy and could do whatever awesome things you wanted and you choose to sit on minichan and lie about and torment squeegee just to "see him lose it more and more.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,817
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,818
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,820
@1,195,813 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Oh no, you saw through my clever disguise foiled my plan to ask you questions and answers you intentionally lied about and happily tell any random nobody that's not your target.
Oh no, you saw through my clever disguise foiled my plan to ask you questions and answers you intentionally lied about and happily tell any random nobody that's not your target.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,821
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,822
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,823
That's right, you were "lying"
Anonymous D triple-posted this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,824
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,825
@1,195,822 (D)
My wife is trans and bi.
My good maybe best friend is trans and we've helped her immensely
Our very good online friend who we've helped immensely is trans
My wife is trans and bi.
My good maybe best friend is trans and we've helped her immensely
Our very good online friend who we've helped immensely is trans
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,826
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,828
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 24 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,829
As much as possible.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,830
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,831
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,833
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,835
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Offer me help. Of whatever kind. Whatever tou want to give me and help.
Offer me help. Of whatever kind. Whatever tou want to give me and help.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,836
Cmon, you're the rich millionaire philanthropist, u tell me how much you want to help me
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,837
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 13 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,838
Offer me reasonable help
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,839
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,841
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,842
you can't handle the truth
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 29 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,843
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 37 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,845
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,848
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No kook, I don't need anything from you
I wouldn't accept a gift from you. You have nothing I want or need.
No kook, I don't need anything from you
I wouldn't accept a gift from you. You have nothing I want or need.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,849
I wouldn't ask you for the time of day.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,850
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,851
bro over here seething that his opps got a Tesla 😩🤣😂🤡🤡🤡 wack ahh bih
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,853
@1,195,850 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you need me to tell you some more how I wouldn't accept a phone call from you? I would ask your for the cure for aids if you had free extra
Do you need me to tell you some more how I wouldn't accept a phone call from you? I would ask your for the cure for aids if you had free extra
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,854
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 24 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,855
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,857
I wouldn't accept payment from you in exchange for product ID sell to literally anyone with money.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,858
@1,195,854 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I will piss on your face if I ever had occasion to be within squatting distance. Is that a reasonable request for you kook?
I will piss on your face if I ever had occasion to be within squatting distance. Is that a reasonable request for you kook?
Anonymous D triple-posted this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,860
Cause that's a promise.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 7 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,861
Buni you've insulted me over and over again. You poke me for days and days and when I respond, you accuse me of transphobia
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 49 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,863
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,866
@1,195,861 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You have spent nearly 2 months and haven't said 1 thing to me or about me that was true. You are nothing but a Liar
You have spent nearly 2 months and haven't said 1 thing to me or about me that was true. You are nothing but a Liar
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,868
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,870
So don't start pretending g ti be the bigger person. You're just fatter.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,871
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 0 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,872
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,873
@1,195,866 (D)
Saying you act manic and type word salads aren't lies. Saying you act creepy and weirdly sexual aren't lies
Saying you act manic and type word salads aren't lies. Saying you act creepy and weirdly sexual aren't lies
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,880
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,882
Wait, this whole thread was created by you as a troll. And then svet said he jerked off to you, and you complimented him for being honest. And then kook pointed out that he's not honest, h jumped in and then seemed to get offended at being called an autist,and it really seemed to spiral off from there
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,883
@1,195,880 (D)
Kill yourself, whore. Now you can cry for another two months about your forum victimization
Kill yourself, whore. Now you can cry for another two months about your forum victimization
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,884
Oh and then circled back and 3rd personed a bit
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,886
Anonymous O replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,929
@1,195,842 (shelly)
> you can't handle the truth
No truth handler you. Bah I deride your truth handing abilities.
> you can't handle the truth
No truth handler you. Bah I deride your truth handing abilities.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,934
Hopefully some of you can see why I just ignore this attention-seeking shambles of a person, by now.Anonymous O replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,935
Is this seriously the guy who used to post as squeegee?
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,954
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,962
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,195,987
@1,195,934 (F)
You'd think so, but I'm sure you'd have no idea if you were or not since squeegee was just a handle.
You'd think so, but I'm sure you'd have no idea if you were or not since squeegee was just a handle.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,082
@1,195,962 (shelly)
Ur not funny but I don't take u serious. They're not mutually exclusive u know.
@1,195,954 (L)
Careful. If you libel me I'll make u pm Becky and pester her for free legal advice
Ur not funny but I don't take u serious. They're not mutually exclusive u know.
@1,195,954 (L)
Careful. If you libel me I'll make u pm Becky and pester her for free legal advice
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,084
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,100
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,109
@previous (D)
idk maybe you could figure it out if you didn't have your head so far up kooks ass weirdo
idk maybe you could figure it out if you didn't have your head so far up kooks ass weirdo
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,122
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,124
@1,196,082 (D)
> Ur not funny but I don't take u serious. They're not mutually exclusive u know.
>
>
> Careful. If you libel me I'll make u pm Becky and pester her for free legal advice
suggesting that your new internet shtick isn't serious is going to land me in trouble? oh no, i'd better cease and desist
> Ur not funny but I don't take u serious. They're not mutually exclusive u know.
>
>
> Careful. If you libel me I'll make u pm Becky and pester her for free legal advice
suggesting that your new internet shtick isn't serious is going to land me in trouble? oh no, i'd better cease and desist
Anonymous L double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,125
@1,196,082 (D)
you've already lost by flinging legal threats, by the way. real litigants just have their lawyer send the letter
you've already lost by flinging legal threats, by the way. real litigants just have their lawyer send the letter
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,134
@1,196,124 (L)
Lol. Missing the joke. Not getting sarcasm or understanding metaphors is a sign of autism. I see you learned how to use sarcasm, but you may want to work on subtlety. Using sarcasm literally is a bit like the whole leather and chains look. That scale covers both hell's angels and the gay leather scene.
...which you probably want to avoid that look too, just saying.
Lol. Missing the joke. Not getting sarcasm or understanding metaphors is a sign of autism. I see you learned how to use sarcasm, but you may want to work on subtlety. Using sarcasm literally is a bit like the whole leather and chains look. That scale covers both hell's angels and the gay leather scene.
...which you probably want to avoid that look too, just saying.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,135
shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,165
@1,196,122 (D)
i would have locked this thread yesterday if I didn't think it would send you into hysterics
i would have locked this thread yesterday if I didn't think it would send you into hysterics
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,169
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,176
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I know ur a liar, and you know you're a liar. But only u know what you used to do with peanut butter.
@1,196,165 (shelly)
Feel free. This was always just about kook being a liar, er, I mean a "liar."
Lock away if u want.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Listen, I've kept myself from saying a lot of things out of respect for other people. But i think you may be too stupid chill out. But you can stop any time.
@brie
I wish you the best.
I know ur a liar, and you know you're a liar. But only u know what you used to do with peanut butter.
@1,196,165 (shelly)
Feel free. This was always just about kook being a liar, er, I mean a "liar."
Lock away if u want.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Listen, I've kept myself from saying a lot of things out of respect for other people. But i think you may be too stupid chill out. But you can stop any time.
@brie
I wish you the best.