Topic: FAO: McWalter
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #103,864 re: KOK KOK KOK
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,170,433 lol
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 10 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,435 @previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw) WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 3 years ago , 21 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,437 @previous (A)
thee thy or EYE sea sea sea chicks re DICKS kok kok koks
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 9 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,438 @previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
thee thy or EYE re: sukky suk suk re: surfer boys re: KOK KOK KOK
Meta !7g5lh2tYDQ joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,456 Imagine claiming here,
http://minichan.net/topic/103857 , that you never stalk some old man in California, only to make a thread stalking some old man in California.
Project much?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 39 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,460 @1,170,438 (A)
what was syntax's deal with the whole kavanaugh hearing? was he just being a crude old man about it or what I don't remember
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 41 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,463 @1,170,456 (Meta !7g5lh2tYDQ)
Perhaps we should post some family pictures here.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 8 months later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,216,098 @OP
@1,170,435 (A)
@1,170,438 (A)
It’s actually sad that you are wasting your life away in this manner.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 32 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,216,103 @previous (H)
nice 8 month old obsession bump
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 6 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,216,104 @previous (I)
Stalkers are not exactly known for being intelligent and well-adjusted.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago , 5 hours later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,216,132 @previous (A)
> Stalkers are not exactly known for being intelligent and well-adjusted.
Some of them collect pictures of their victims for 25 years.
↕